fix(image): [image] Fix bug regarding image links #2192
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to CSS variables and properties within the image viewer and image components. Specifically, a CSS variable for the mask background color in the image viewer is removed, and its usage is replaced with a fixed RGBA color. Additionally, the error background image variable for the image component is updated to use a base64-encoded JPEG image instead of a non-existent value. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/theme/src/image/vars.less (1)
25-25: LGTM! This change fixes the image error background.The update to
--ti-image-error-bg-image-urlcorrectly sets a base64-encoded JPEG image as the background for the error state. This change aligns with the PR objective to fix a bug related to image links.Consider adding a comment above this line to explain the purpose of this base64-encoded image, e.g.:
// Base64-encoded JPEG for image error backgroundThis would improve code readability and maintainability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- packages/theme/src/image-viewer/index.less (1 hunks)
- packages/theme/src/image-viewer/vars.less (0 hunks)
- packages/theme/src/image/vars.less (1 hunks)
💤 Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (1)
- packages/theme/src/image-viewer/vars.less
🔇 Additional comments not posted (1)
packages/theme/src/image-viewer/index.less (1)
143-143: Approved, but clarification needed on bug fix and theming impact.The change from a CSS variable to a fixed RGBA value for the mask background appears to address the reported bug. However, I have a few points to consider:
Could you clarify how this change relates to fixing image links? The connection isn't immediately apparent from the code change alone.
Removing the CSS variable
--ti-image-viewer-mask-bg-colormight impact theming capabilities. Can you verify if this change affects any existing themes or customization options?It would be helpful to document the reason for this change, perhaps in a code comment, to explain why the CSS variable was replaced with a fixed value.
To check for any other usages of the removed CSS variable, please run the following command:
This will help ensure that the variable isn't used elsewhere in the project, potentially causing inconsistencies.
✅ Verification successful
Verified:
ti-image-viewer-mask-bg-coloris no longer used in the codebase.The removal of the CSS variable does not affect any other parts of the project, ensuring that theming capabilities remain intact.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining usage of the removed CSS variable rg --type less --type css --type vue "ti-image-viewer-mask-bg-color"Length of output: 96
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining usage of the removed CSS variable in .less, .css, and .vue files rg "ti-image-viewer-mask-bg-color" --type-add 'vue:*.vue' --type less --type cssLength of output: 80
|
Duplicate #2188 |
Duplicate #2188 |
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes