Generate filesystem based SBOM for pip dependency #250
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
sophiewigmore
approved these changes
Apr 26, 2022
|
Hey @paketo-buildpacks/python-maintainers! I'm reviewing this PR because its similar to others I've recently reviewed and seems like a time-saver since I have context. Feel free to also review it if you see fit! I'm not a maintainer, but I am a contributor. I have also worked on a number of similar PRs to implement filesystem SBOM in other buildpacks (example), as well as reviewed a number of related PRs (example). |
thitch97
approved these changes
Apr 26, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Add support for filesystem-based SBOM, in addition to the existing metadata-label-based BOM, in order to conform with: Paketo RFC0038.
Closes #213
Checklist