[pallet-revive] Update delegate_call to accept address and weight #6111

ermalkaleci · 2024-10-17T15:32:50Z

Enhance the delegate_call function to accept an address target parameter instead of a code_hash. This allows direct identification of the target contract using the provided address.
Additionally, introduce parameters for specifying a customizable ref_time limit and proof_size limit, thereby improving flexibility and control during contract interactions.

…t/update-delegate-call

ermalkaleci · 2024-10-24T17:02:40Z

@xermicus @athei Can someone review this please?

substrate/frame/revive/src/exec.rs

prdoc/pr_6111.prdoc

…t/update-delegate-call

athei

This implementation will use the wrong immutable data. Reason is that the contract info of the caller is used in the Frame. You probably need to add the callees address in the DelegatedCall structure and use that in the immutable_data() function.

substrate/frame/revive/src/wasm/runtime.rs

ermalkaleci · 2024-10-30T13:36:09Z

This implementation will use the wrong immutable data. Reason is that the contract info of the caller is used in the Frame. You probably need to add the callees address in the DelegatedCall structure and use that in the immutable_data() function.

Do you mean my implementation is wrong or currently access to immutable is incorrect?

athei · 2024-10-30T14:13:52Z

The bug existed before. Introduced with immutable variable support. But passing the address makes it possible to resolve this bug. Hence it should be fixed here.

ermalkaleci · 2024-10-30T20:30:39Z

The bug existed before. Introduced with immutable variable support. But passing the address makes it possible to resolve this bug. Hence it should be fixed here.

Did a quick check at it seems the immutable is read for account of top frame which will be the callee.

polkadot-sdk/substrate/frame/revive/src/exec.rs

Line 1600 in 01936b3

let address = T::AddressMapper::to_address(self.account_id());

Also there's a test for it

polkadot-sdk/substrate/frame/revive/src/exec.rs

Line 4597 in 01936b3

fn correct_immutable_data_in_delegate_call() {

Am I missing something?

athei · 2024-10-30T20:39:11Z

seems the immutable is read for account of top frame which will be the callee

This is wrong. delegate_call has the callers contract info on top of the frame. That is the whole point of delegate call: Executing a different code in the context of the caller.

Passed here:
https://github.com/ermalkaleci/polkadot-sdk/blob/a5f2f1c8444859b1f69a0e4a050ac5a116f31cb4/substrate/frame/revive/src/exec.rs#L1423

You shadow the callees contract info with the callers one herre:
https://github.com/ermalkaleci/polkadot-sdk/blob/a5f2f1c8444859b1f69a0e4a050ac5a116f31cb4/substrate/frame/revive/src/exec.rs#L1417

ermalkaleci · 2024-10-31T09:20:01Z

@athei Because of the way immutable is implemented, I thought the logic is correct but it's not. Immutable ends on EVM bytecode but we keep it as storage. Delegate call should not access immutable of caller but callee. All clear now

athei · 2024-10-31T09:40:19Z

Exactly. The current logic is wrong.

…t/update-delegate-call

athei

I think it is still wrong. I would expect changes to fn immutable_storage(). You added a new field but don't read it anywhere? This clearly demonstrates that the correct_immutable_data_in_delegate_call test is doing the wrong thing. Needs some fixing or additional tests.

substrate/frame/revive/src/exec.rs

athei · 2024-10-31T15:29:23Z

Okay I found the place where you modified immutable_data. It looks fine. But I am confused that the correct_immutable_data_in_delegate_call test didn't need any modification. Can you look into this? Because we didn't seem to properly test that the immutable data of the callee's are used. Or am I getting something wrong?

This reverts commit 46af335.

ermalkaleci · 2024-10-31T18:49:00Z

Would be nice if you could address the two nits that are still open.

Can you help me understand which one you're referring?

athei · 2024-10-31T20:35:55Z

I can easily revert it, but I don't see it as redundant; instead, I find it straightforward and easy to understand.

How is having a field account_id and address on the same structure not confusing.

athei · 2024-10-31T20:38:44Z

Would be nice if you could address the two nits that are still open.

Can you help me understand which one you're referring?

Just the two open remarks. Scroll up.

athei

By reading your changes to the delegate dependency locking I just realized that this whole system will be broken by this: We are locking code hashes so that they cannot disappear. But now we are requiring contracts to not disappear since we need to read their immutable data.

So the locking system is essentially useless. Need to think how to proceed. The immutables really make our lifes hard.

substrate/frame/revive/uapi/src/host.rs

substrate/frame/revive/src/wasm/runtime.rs

substrate/frame/revive/src/exec.rs

substrate/frame/revive/src/tests.rs

ermalkaleci · 2024-11-06T16:11:17Z

So the locking system is essentially useless. Need to think how to proceed. The immutables really make our lifes hard.

Indeed. Maybe we can address it on another PR

ermalkaleci · 2024-11-06T16:43:40Z

So the locking system is essentially useless. Need to think how to proceed. The immutables really make our lifes hard.

Indeed. Maybe we can address it on another PR

@athei Actually I don't think we have an issue here. If the contract is terminated then you can't delegate calls to that address.

athei · 2024-11-06T18:27:44Z

substrate/frame/revive/src/tests.rs

+				.data((callee_addr, 33u64).encode())
+				.build()
+				.result,
+			Error::<Test>::StorageDepositLimitExhausted,


I would expect ContractTrapped here: The api::delegate_call will return an error because the sub call uses too much storage. The caller then calls unwrap which should result in ContractTrapped.

I might be missing something. But it would be nice if you could get to the bottom of this.

polkadot-sdk/substrate/frame/revive/src/tests.rs

Line 3364 in c1238b6

<Error<Test>>::StorageDepositLimitExhausted,

Regarding to this test, a sub-call will return StorageDepositLimitExhausted instead of ContractTrapped

In your quoted example we fail in the caller. So this is expected. In your test you are supposed to fail in the callee.

I didn't mean to point to specific assertions but the test case itself which I think is about subcalls

Hmm I think we trap the caller in case the storage deposit is exhausted in the sub call. I think this is an oversight but it explains your test. I might need to revisit this.

athei · 2024-11-06T18:29:42Z

So the locking system is essentially useless. Need to think how to proceed. The immutables really make our lifes hard.

Indeed. Maybe we can address it on another PR

@athei Actually I don't think we have an issue here. If the contract is terminated then you can't delegate calls to that address.

But this is exactly the issue. The locking system exists to make sure that you can always delegate. Otherwise somebody could delete the contract and the delegate will fail. The locking system allows you to lock the code hash for a deposit to make sure it can't be deleted.

On Ethereum this is not a problem. They changed the SELFDESTRUCT to not actually remove the contract.

Our options are basically:

Change the locking system to lock contracts and not code hashes. This will work but it is still not 100% compatible: On EVM all contracts are locked by default and we would require them to call a custom API. It is also a lot of work to implement probably.
Just remove the ability to remove contracts and code. The most compatible solution but provides no incentive to remove code blobs.
Remove the locking system and call it a day. Probably the worst of both worlds.

But we should not block your PR for that. Let's get this merged and think about this later. Looks good. Just this one confusion regarding the test.

ermalkaleci · 2024-11-07T06:51:34Z

I believe removing the locking mechanism is the best course of action here. It's important to be mindful of where and how we delegate function calls. This aligns with the standard EVM design, although SELFDESTRUCT is changed recently.

If we decide to make a contract immortal, we should also reconsider the need for a deposit limit, as it would no longer serve a purpose in such a scenario.

athei

I believe removing the locking mechanism is the best course of action here. It's important to be mindful of where and how we delegate function calls. This aligns with the standard EVM design, although SELFDESTRUCT is changed recently.

It doesn't align with EVM because, as you pointed out, contracts are immortal on EVM. Will need some more consideration to make a decision.

pgherveou · 2024-11-18T16:38:51Z

/tip medium

substrate-tip-bot · 2024-11-18T16:38:56Z

@ermalkaleci Contributor did not properly post their account address.

Make sure the pull request description (or user bio) has: "{network} address: {address}".

@EclesioMeloJunior

* Migrate pallet-transaction-storage and pallet-indices to benchmark v2 (paritytech#6290) Part of: paritytech#6202 --------- Co-authored-by: Giuseppe Re <giuseppe.re@parity.io> Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com> * fix prospective-parachains best backable chain reversion bug (paritytech#6417) Kudos to @EclesioMeloJunior for noticing it Also added a regression test for it. The existing unit test was exercising only the case where the full chain is reverted --------- Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de> * Remove network starter that is no longer needed (paritytech#6400) # Description This seems to be an old artifact of the long closed paritytech/substrate#6827 that I noticed when working on related code earlier. ## Integration `NetworkStarter` was removed, simply remove its usage: ```diff -let (network, system_rpc_tx, tx_handler_controller, start_network, sync_service) = +let (network, system_rpc_tx, tx_handler_controller, sync_service) = build_network(BuildNetworkParams { ... -start_network.start_network(); ``` ## Review Notes Changes are trivial, the only reason for this to not be accepted is if it is desired to not start network automatically for whatever reason, in which case the description of network starter needs to change. # Checklist * [x] My PR includes a detailed description as outlined in the "Description" and its two subsections above. * [ ] My PR follows the [labeling requirements]( https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/docs/contributor/CONTRIBUTING.md#Process ) of this project (at minimum one label for `T` required) * External contributors: ask maintainers to put the right label on your PR. --------- Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de> * `fatxpool`: size limits implemented (paritytech#6262) This PR adds size-limits to the fork-aware transaction pool. **Review Notes** - Existing [`TrackedMap`](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/58fd5ae4ce883f42c360e3ad4a5df7d2258b42fe/substrate/client/transaction-pool/src/graph/tracked_map.rs#L33-L41) is used in internal mempool to track the size of extrinsics: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/58fd5ae4ce883f42c360e3ad4a5df7d2258b42fe/substrate/client/transaction-pool/src/graph/tracked_map.rs#L33-L41 - In this PR, I also removed the logic that kept transactions in the `tx_mem_pool` if they were immediately dropped by the views. Initially, I implemented this as an improvement: if there was available space in the _mempool_ and all views dropped the transaction upon submission, the transaction would still be retained in the _mempool_. However, upon further consideration, I decided to remove this functionality to reduce unnecessary complexity. Now, when all views drop a transaction during submission, it is automatically rejected, with the `submit/submit_and_watch` call returning `ImmediatelyDropped`. Closes: paritytech#5476 --------- Co-authored-by: Sebastian Kunert <skunert49@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de> * pallet-membership: Do not verify the `MembershipChanged` in bechmarks (paritytech#6439) There is no need to verify in the `pallet-membership` benchmark that the `MemembershipChanged` implementation works as the pallet thinks it should work. If you for example set it to `()`, `get_prime()` will always return `None`. TLDR: Remove the checks of `MembershipChanged` in the benchmarks to support any kind of implementation. --------- Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io> * add FeeManager to pallet xcm (paritytech#5363) Closes paritytech#2082 change send xcm to use `xcm::executor::FeeManager` to determine if the sender should be charged. I had to change the `FeeManager` of the penpal config to ensure the same test behaviour as before. For the other tests, I'm using the `FeeManager` from the `xcm::executor::FeeManager` as this one is used to check if the fee can be waived on the charge fees method. --------- Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io> Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com> * Use relay chain block number in the broker pallet instead of block number (paritytech#5656) Based on paritytech#3331 Related to paritytech#3268 Implements migrations with customizable block number to relay height number translation function. Adds block to relay height migration code for rococo and westend. --------- Co-authored-by: DavidK <davidk@parity.io> Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <5588131+kianenigma@users.noreply.github.com> * migrate pallet-nft-fractionalization to benchmarking v2 syntax (paritytech#6301) Migrates pallet-nft-fractionalization to benchmarking v2 syntax. Part of: * paritytech#6202 --------- Co-authored-by: Giuseppe Re <giuseppe.re@parity.io> Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de> * [pallet-revive] adjust fee dry-run calculation (paritytech#6393) - Fix bare_eth_transact so that it estimate more precisely the transaction fee - Add some context to the build.rs to make it easier to troubleshoot errors - Add TransactionBuilder for the RPC tests. - Improve error message, proxy rpc error from the node and handle reverted error message - Add logs in ReceiptInfo --------- Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com> * NoOp Impl Polling Trait (paritytech#5311) Adds NoOp implementation for the `Polling` trait and updates benchmarks in `pallet-ranked-collective`. --------- Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io> * Migrate pallet-child-bounties benchmark to v2 (paritytech#6310) Part of: - paritytech#6202. --------- Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by: Giuseppe Re <giuseppe.re@parity.io> * Introduce `ConstUint` to make dependent types in `DefaultConfig` more adaptable (paritytech#6425) # Description Resolves paritytech#6193 This PR introduces `ConstUint` as a replacement for existing constant getter types like `ConstU8`, `ConstU16`, etc., providing a more flexible and unified approach. ## Integration This update is backward compatible, so developers can choose to adopt `ConstUint` in new implementations or continue using the existing types as needed. ## Review Notes `ConstUint` is a convenient alternative to `ConstU8`, `ConstU16`, and similar types, particularly useful for configuring `DefaultConfig` in pallets. It enables configuring the underlying integer for a specific type without the need to update all dependent types, offering enhanced flexibility in type management. # Checklist * [x] My PR includes a detailed description as outlined in the "Description" and its two subsections above. * [ ] My PR follows the [labeling requirements]( https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/docs/contributor/CONTRIBUTING.md#Process ) of this project (at minimum one label for `T` required) * External contributors: ask maintainers to put the right label on your PR. * [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (if applicable) * [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if applicable) * Use type alias for transactions (paritytech#6431) Very tiny change that helps with debugging of transactions propagation by referring to the same type alias not only at receiving side, but also on the sending size for symmetry * [Release|CI/CD] Fix audiences changelog template (paritytech#6444) This PR addresses an issue mentioned [here](paritytech#6424 (comment)). The problem was that when the prdoc file has two audiences, but only one description like in [prdoc_5660](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/prdoc/1.16.0/pr_5660.prdoc) it was ignored by the template. * XCMv5: add ExecuteWithOrigin instruction (paritytech#6304) Added `ExecuteWithOrigin` instruction according to the old XCM RFC 38: polkadot-fellows/xcm-format#38. This instruction allows you to descend or clear while going back again. ## TODO - [x] Implementation - [x] Unit tests - [x] Integration tests - [x] Benchmarks - [x] PRDoc ## Future work Modify `WithComputedOrigin` barrier to allow, for example, fees to be paid with a descendant origin using this instruction. --------- Signed-off-by: Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io> Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io> Co-authored-by: Andrii <ndk@parity.io> Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Joseph Zhao <65984904+programskillforverification@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Nazar Mokrynskyi <nazar@mokrynskyi.com> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de> Co-authored-by: Shawn Tabrizi <shawntabrizi@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: command-bot <> * rpc server: fix host filter for localhost on ipv6 (paritytech#6454) This PR fixes an issue that I discovered using connecting to the RPC via localhost using cURL, where cURL tries to connect to via ipv6 before ipv4 when querying `localhost` which messed up the http host filter whereas it would connect to the address `[::1]::9944 host_header: localhost:9944` but the ipv6 interface only whitelisted `[::1]:9944` which this fixes. So let's whitelist all localhost interfaces to avoid such weird edge-cases. ### Behavior before this PR ```bash $ polkadot --chain westend-dev & $ curl -v \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":"id","method":"system_name"}' \ http://localhost:9944 * Host localhost:9944 was resolved. * IPv6: ::1 * IPv4: 127.0.0.1 * Trying [::1]:9944... * Connected to localhost (::1) port 9944 > POST / HTTP/1.1 > Host: localhost:9944 > User-Agent: curl/8.5.0 > Accept: */* > Content-Type: application/json > Content-Length: 50 > < HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden < content-type: text/plain < content-length: 41 < date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 13:03:49 GMT < Provided Host header is not whitelisted. * Connection #0 to host localhost left intact ``` ### Behavior after this PR ```bash $ polkadot --chain westend-dev & ➜ wasm-tests (update-artifacts-1731284930) ✗ curl -v \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":"id","method":"system_name"}' \ http://localhost:9944 * Host localhost:9944 was resolved. * IPv6: ::1 * IPv4: 127.0.0.1 * Trying [::1]:9944... * Connected to localhost (::1) port 9944 > POST / HTTP/1.1 > Host: localhost:9944 > User-Agent: curl/8.5.0 > Accept: */* > Content-Type: application/json > Content-Length: 50 > < HTTP/1.1 200 OK < content-type: application/json; charset=utf-8 < vary: origin, access-control-request-method, access-control-request-headers < content-length: 54 < date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 13:02:57 GMT < * Connection #0 to host localhost left intact {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":"id","result":"Parity Polkadot"}% ``` --------- Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by: command-bot <> * [pallet-revive] eth-rpc fixes (paritytech#6453) - Breaking down the integration-test into multiple tests - Fix tx hash to use expected keccak-256 - Add option to ethers.js example to connect to westend and use a private key --------- Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com> * Remove debug message about pruning active leaves (paritytech#6440) # Description The debug message was added to identify a potential memory leak. However, recent observations show that pruning works as expected. Therefore, it is best to remove this line, as it generates quite annoying logs. ## Integration Doesn't affect downstream projects. --------- Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com> * [Tx ext stage 2: 1/4] Add `TransactionSource` as argument in `TransactionExtension::validate` (paritytech#6323) ## Meta This PR is part of 4 PR: * paritytech#6323 * paritytech#6324 * paritytech#6325 * paritytech#6326 ## Description One goal of transaction extension is to get rid or unsigned transactions. But unsigned transaction validation has access to the `TransactionSource`. The source is used for unsigned transactions that the node trust and don't want to pay upfront. Instead of using transaction source we could do: the transaction is valid if it is signed by the block author, conceptually it should work, but it doesn't look so easy. This PR add `TransactionSource` to the validate function for transaction extensions * remove pallet::getter from pallet-staking (paritytech#6184) # Description Part of paritytech#3326 Removes all pallet::getter occurrences from pallet-staking and replaces them with explicit implementations. Adds tests to verify that retrieval of affected entities works as expected so via storage::getter. ## Review Notes 1. Traits added to the `derive` attribute are used in tests (either directly or indirectly). 2. The getters had to be placed in a separate impl block since the other one is annotated with `#[pallet::call]` and that requires `#[pallet::call_index(0)]` annotation on each function in that block. So I thought it's better to separate them. --------- Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <donal.murray@parity.io> Co-authored-by: Guillaume Thiolliere <gui.thiolliere@gmail.com> * Refactor pallet `society` (paritytech#6367) - [x] Removing `without_storage_info` and adding bounds on the stored types for pallet `society` - issue paritytech#6289 - [x] Migrating to benchmarking V2 - paritytech#6202 --------- Co-authored-by: Guillaume Thiolliere <gui.thiolliere@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Muharem <ismailov.m.h@gmail.com> * frame-benchmarking: Use correct components for pallet instances (paritytech#6435) When using multiple instances of the same pallet, each instance was executed with the components of all instances. While actually each instance should only be executed with the components generated for the particular instance. The problem here was that in the runtime only the pallet-name was used to determine if a certain pallet should be benchmarked. When using instances, the pallet name is the same for both of these instances. The solution is to also take the instance name into account. The fix requires to change the `Benchmark` runtime api to also take the `instance`. The node side is written in a backwards compatible way to also support runtimes which do not yet support the `instance` parameter. --------- Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by: clangenb <37865735+clangenb@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io> * Get rid of `libp2p` dependency in `sc-authority-discovery` (paritytech#5842) ## Issue paritytech#4859 ## Description This PR removes `libp2p` types in authority-discovery, and replace them with network backend agnostic types from `sc-network-types`. The `sc-network` interface is therefore updated accordingly. --------- Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de> Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Dmitry Markin <dmitry@markin.tech> Co-authored-by: Alexandru Vasile <60601340+lexnv@users.noreply.github.com> * backing: improve session buffering for runtime information (paritytech#6284) ## Issue [[paritytech#3421] backing: improve session buffering for runtime information](paritytech#3421) ## Description In the current implementation of the backing module, certain pieces of information, which remain unchanged throughout a session, are fetched multiple times via runtime API calls. The goal of this task was to introduce a local cache to store such session-stable information and perform the runtime API call only once per session. This PR implements caching specifically for the validators list, node features, executor parameters, minimum backing votes threshold, and validator-to-group mapping, which were previously fetched from the runtime or computed each time `PerRelayParentState` was built. Now, this information is cached and reused within the session. ## TODO * [X] Create a separate struct for per-session caches; * [X] Cache validators list; * [X] Cache node features; * [X] Cache executor parameters; * [X] Cache minimum backing votes threshold; * [X] Cache validator-to-group mapping; * [X] Update tests to reflect these changes; * [X] Add prdoc. ## For the next PR Cache validator groups and any other session-stable data (if present). * Add litep2p network protocol benches (paritytech#6455) # Description Add support to run networking protocol benchmarks with litep2p backend. Now we can compare the work of both libp2p and litep2p backends for notifications and request-response protocols. Next step: extract worker initialization from the benchmark loop. ### Example run on local machine <img width="916" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6bb9f90a-76a4-417e-b9d3-db27aa8a356f"> ## Integration Does not affect downstream projects. ## Review Notes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/d4d9502538e8a940b809ecc77843af3cea101e19/substrate/client/network/src/litep2p/service.rs#L510-L520 This method should be implemented to run request benchmarks. --------- Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com> * Fixed bridges zombienet tests because of removed NetworkId::Rococo/Westend from xcm::v5 (paritytech#6465) Closes: paritytech#6449 * Fix staking benchmark (paritytech#6463) Found by @ggwpez Fix staking benchmark, error was introduced when migrating to v2: paritytech#6025 --------- Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com> * add pipeline to build runtimes * Follow up work on `TransactionExtension` - fix weights and clean up `UncheckedExtrinsic` (paritytech#6418) Follow up to paritytech#3685 Partially fixes paritytech#6403 The main PR introduced bare support for the new extension version byte as well as extension weights and benchmarking. This PR: - Removes the redundant extension version byte from the signed v4 extrinsic, previously unused and defaulted to 0. - Adds the extension version byte to the inherited implication passed to `General` transactions. - Whitelists the `pallet_authorship::Author`, `frame_system::Digest` and `pallet_transaction_payment::NextFeeMultiplier` storage items as they are read multiple times by extensions for each transaction, but are hot in memory and currently overestimate the weight. - Whitelists the benchmark caller for `CheckEra` and `CheckGenesis` as the reads are performed for every transaction and overestimate the weight. - Updates the umbrella frame weight template to work with the system extension changes. - Plans on re-running the benchmarks at least for the `frame_system` extensions. --------- Signed-off-by: georgepisaltu <george.pisaltu@parity.io> Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: gui <gui.thiolliere@gmail.com> * feat: add workflow to test readme generation (paritytech#6359) # Description Created a workflow to search for README.docify.md in the repo, and run cargo build --features generate-readme in the dir of the file (assuming it is related to a crate). If the git diff shows some output for the README.md, then the file update wasn't pushed on the branch, and the workflow fails. Closes paritytech#6331 ## Integration Downstream projects that want to adopt this README checking workflow should: 1. Copy the `.github/workflows/readme-check.yml` file to their repository 2. Ensure any `README.docify.md` files in their project follow the expected format 3. Implement the `generate-readme` feature flag in their Cargo.toml if not already present ## Review Notes This PR adds a GitHub Actions workflow that automatically verifies README.md files are up-to-date with their corresponding README.docify.md sources. Key implementation details: - The workflow runs on both PRs and pushes to main - It finds all `README.docify.md` files recursively in the repository - For each file found: - Builds the project with `--features generate-readme` in that directory - Checks if the README.md has any uncommitted changes - Fails if any README.md is out of sync --------- Co-authored-by: Alexander Samusev <41779041+alvicsam@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Iulian Barbu <14218860+iulianbarbu@users.noreply.github.com> * [pallet-revive] set logs_bloom (paritytech#6460) Set the logs_bloom in the transaction receipt --------- Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by: Cyrill Leutwiler <cyrill@parity.io> * Support more types in TypeWithDefault (paritytech#6411) # Description When using `TypeWithDefault<u32, ..>` as the default nonce provider to overcome the [replay attack](https://wiki.polkadot.network/docs/transaction-attacks#replay-attack) issue, it fails to compile due to `TypeWithDefault<u32, ..>: TryFrom<u64>` is not satisfied (which is required by trait `BaseArithmetic`). This is because the blanket implementation `TryFrom<U> for T where U: Into<T>` only impl `TryFrom<u16>` and `TryFrom<u8>` for `u32` since `u32` only impl `Into` for `u16` and `u8` but not `u64`. This PR fixes the issue by adding `TryFrom<u16/u32/u64/u128>` and `From<u8/u16/u32/u64/u128>` impl (using macro) for `TypeWithDefault<u8/u16/u32/u64/u128, ..>` and removing the blanket impl (otherwise the compiler will complain about conflicting impl), such that `TypeWithDefault<u8/u16/u32/u64/u128, ..>: AtLeast8/16/32Bit` is satisfied. ## Integration This PR adds support to more types to be used with `TypeWithDefault`, existing code that used `u64` with `TypeWithDefault` should not be affected, an unit test is added to ensure that. ## Review Notes This PR simply makes `TypeWithDefault<u8/u16/u32/u64/u128, ..>: AtLeast8/16/32Bit` satisfied --------- Signed-off-by: linning <linningde25@gmail.com> * [pallet-revive] use evm decimals in call host fn (paritytech#6466) This PR update the pallet to use the EVM 18 decimal balance in contracts call and host functions instead of the native balance. It also updates the js example to add the piggy-bank solidity contract that expose the problem --------- Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com> * network/litep2p: Update litep2p network backend to version 0.8.1 (paritytech#6484) This PR updates the litep2p backend to version 0.8.1 from 0.8.0. - Check the [litep2p updates forum post](https://forum.polkadot.network/t/litep2p-network-backend-updates/9973/3) for performance dashboards. - Check [litep2p release notes](paritytech/litep2p#288) The v0.8.1 release includes key fixes that enhance the stability and performance of the litep2p library. The focus is on long-running stability and improvements to polling mechanisms. ### Long Running Stability Improvements This issue caused long-running nodes to reject all incoming connections, impacting overall stability. Addressed a bug in the connection limits functionality that incorrectly tracked connections due for rejection. This issue caused an artificial increase in inbound peers, which were not being properly removed from the connection limit count. This fix ensures more accurate tracking and management of peer connections [paritytech#286](paritytech/litep2p#286). ### Polling implementation fixes This release provides multiple fixes to the polling mechanism, improving how connections and events are processed: - Resolved an overflow issue in TransportContext’s polling index for streams, preventing potential crashes ([paritytech#283](paritytech/litep2p#283)). - Fixed a delay in the manager’s poll_next function that prevented immediate polling of newly added futures ([paritytech#287](paritytech/litep2p#287)). - Corrected an issue where the listener did not return Poll::Ready(None) when it was closed, ensuring proper signal handling ([paritytech#285](paritytech/litep2p#285)). ### Fixed - manager: Fix connection limits tracking of rejected connections ([paritytech#286](paritytech/litep2p#286)) - transport: Fix waking up on filtered events from `poll_next` ([paritytech#287](paritytech/litep2p#287)) - transports: Fix missing Poll::Ready(None) event from listener ([paritytech#285](paritytech/litep2p#285)) - manager: Avoid overflow on stream implementation for `TransportContext` ([paritytech#283](paritytech/litep2p#283)) - manager: Log when polling returns Ready(None) ([paritytech#284](paritytech/litep2p#284)) ### Testing Done Started kusama nodes running side by side with a higher number of inbound and outbound connections (500). We previously tested with peers bounded at 50. This testing filtered out the fixes included in the latest release. With this high connection testing setup, litep2p outperforms libp2p in almost every domain, from performance to the warnings / errors encountered while operating the nodes. TLDR: this is the version we need to test on kusama validators next - Litep2p Repo | Count | Level | Triage report -|-|-|- polkadot-sdk | 409 | warn | Report .*: .* to .*. Reason: .*. Banned, disconnecting. ( Peer disconnected with inflight after backoffs. Banned, disconnecting. ) litep2p | 128 | warn | Refusing to add known address that corresponds to a different peer ID litep2p | 54 | warn | inbound identify substream opened for peer who doesn't exist polkadot-sdk | 7 | error | 💔 Called `on_validated_block_announce` with a bad peer ID .* polkadot-sdk | 1 | warn | ❌ Error while dialing .*: .* polkadot-sdk | 1 | warn | Report .*: .* to .*. Reason: .*. Banned, disconnecting. ( Invalid justification. Banned, disconnecting. ) - Libp2p Repo | Count | Level | Triage report -|-|-|- polkadot-sdk | 1023 | warn | 💔 Ignored block $#.* -- .*$ announcement from .* because all validation slots are occupied. polkadot-sdk | 472 | warn | Report .*: .* to .*. Reason: .*. Banned, disconnecting. ( Unsupported protocol. Banned, disconnecting. ) polkadot-sdk | 379 | error | 💔 Called `on_validated_block_announce` with a bad peer ID .* polkadot-sdk | 163 | warn | Report .*: .* to .*. Reason: .*. Banned, disconnecting. ( Invalid justification. Banned, disconnecting. ) polkadot-sdk | 116 | warn | Report .*: .* to .*. Reason: .*. Banned, disconnecting. ( Peer disconnected with inflight after backoffs. Banned, disconnecting. ) polkadot-sdk | 83 | warn | Report .*: .* to .*. Reason: .*. Banned, disconnecting. ( Same block request multiple times. Banned, disconnecting. ) polkadot-sdk | 4 | warn | Re-finalized block #.* $.*$ in the canonical chain, current best finalized is #.* polkadot-sdk | 2 | warn | Report .*: .* to .*. Reason: .*. Banned, disconnecting. ( Genesis mismatch. Banned, disconnecting. ) polkadot-sdk | 2 | warn | Report .*: .* to .*. Reason: .*. Banned, disconnecting. ( Not requested block data. Banned, disconnecting. ) polkadot-sdk | 2 | warn | Can't listen on .* because: .* polkadot-sdk | 1 | warn | ❌ Error while dialing .*: .* --------- Signed-off-by: Alexandru Vasile <alexandru.vasile@parity.io> * sp-trie: minor fix to avoid possible panic during node decoding (paritytech#6486) # Description This PR is a simple fix consisting of adding a check to the process of decoding nodes of a storage proof to avoid panicking when receiving badly-constructed proofs, returning an error instead. This would close paritytech#6485 ## Integration No changes have to be done downstream, and as such the version bump should be minor. --------- Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de> * migrate pallet-nomination-pool-benchmarking to benchmarking syntax v2 (paritytech#6302) Migrates pallet-nomination-pool-benchmarking to benchmarking syntax v2. Part of: * paritytech#6202 --------- Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by: Guillaume Thiolliere <guillaume.thiolliere@parity.io> Co-authored-by: Giuseppe Re <giuseppe.re@parity.io> * Migrate some pallets to benchmark v2 (paritytech#6311) Part of paritytech#6202 --------- Co-authored-by: Guillaume Thiolliere <guillaume.thiolliere@parity.io> Co-authored-by: Giuseppe Re <giuseppe.re@parity.io> * Mention that account might still be required in doc for feeless if. (paritytech#6490) Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de> * Pure state sync refactoring (part-1) (paritytech#6249) This pure refactoring of state sync is preparing for paritytech#4. As the rough plan in paritytech#4 (comment), there will be two PRs for the state sync refactoring. This first PR focuses on isolating the function `process_state_key_values()` as the central point for storing received state data in memory. This function will later be adapted to forward the state data directly to the DB layer for persistent sync. A follow-up PR will handle the encapsulation of `StateSyncMetadata` to support this persistent storage. Although there are many commits in this PR, each commit is small and intentionally incremental to facilitate a smoother review, please review them commit by commit. Each commit should represent an equivalent rewrite of the existing logic, with one exception paritytech@bb447b2, which has a slight deviation from the original but is correct IMHO. Please give this commit special attention during the review. * [WIP][ci] Add worfklow stopper (paritytech#4551) PR to implements workflow stopper - a custom solution to stop all workflows if one of a required jobs failed. Previously we had the same solution in GitLab and it saved a lot of compute. Because GitHub doesn't have one united pipeline and instead it has multiple workflows something like this has to be implemented. cc paritytech/ci_cd#939 * Remove `ProspectiveParachainsMode` usage in backing subsystem (paritytech#6215) Since async backing parameters runtime api is released on all networks the code in backing subsystem can be simplified by removing the usages of `ProspectiveParachainsMode` and keeping only the branches of the code under `ProspectiveParachainsMode::Enabled`. The PR does that and reworks the tests in mod.rs to use async backing. It's a preparation for paritytech#5079 --------- Co-authored-by: Alin Dima <alin@parity.io> Co-authored-by: command-bot <> * sp-runtime: Be a little bit more functional :D (paritytech#6526) Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com> * `TransactionPool` API uses `async_trait` (paritytech#6528) This PR refactors `TransactionPool` API to use `async_trait`, replacing the` Pin<Box<...>>` pattern. This should improve readability and maintainability. The change is not altering any functionality. --------- Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com> * sp-trie: correctly avoid panicking when decoding bad compact proofs (paritytech#6502) # Description Opening another PR because I added a test to check for my fix pushed in paritytech#6486 and realized that for some reason I completely forgot how to code and did not fix the underlying issue, since out-of-bounds indexing could still happen even with the check I added. This one should fix that and, as an added bonus, has a simple test used as an integrity check to make sure future changes don't accidently revert this fix. Now `sp-trie` should definitely not panic when faced with bad `CompactProof`s. Sorry about that 😅 This, like paritytech#6486, is related to issue paritytech#6485 ## Integration No changes have to be done downstream, and as such the version bump should be minor. --------- Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de> * [pallet-revive] Update delegate_call to accept address and weight (paritytech#6111) Enhance the `delegate_call` function to accept an `address` target parameter instead of a `code_hash`. This allows direct identification of the target contract using the provided address. Additionally, introduce parameters for specifying a customizable `ref_time` limit and `proof_size` limit, thereby improving flexibility and control during contract interactions. --------- Co-authored-by: Alexander Theißen <alex.theissen@me.com> * Fix metrics not shutting down if there are open connections (paritytech#6220) Fix prometheus metrics not shutting down if there are open connections. I fixed the same issue in the past but it broke again after a dependecy upgrade. See also: paritytech#1637 * Validator Re-Enabling (paritytech#5724) Aims to implement Stage 3 of Validator Disbling as outlined here: paritytech#4359 Features: - [x] New Disabling Strategy (Staking level) - [x] Re-enabling logic (Session level) - [x] More generic disabling decision output - [x] New Disabling Events Testing & Security: - [x] Unit tests - [x] Mock tests - [x] Try-runtime checks - [x] Try-runtime tested on westend snap - [x] Try-runtime CI tests - [ ] Re-enabling Zombienet Test (?) - [ ] SRLabs Audit Closes paritytech#4745 Closes paritytech#2418 --------- Co-authored-by: ordian <write@reusable.software> Co-authored-by: Ankan <10196091+Ank4n@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Tsvetomir Dimitrov <tsvetomir@parity.io> * Migrate pallet-democracy benchmarks to benchmark v2 syntax (paritytech#6509) # Description Migrates pallet-democracy benchmarks to benchmark v2 syntax This is Part of paritytech#6202 --------- Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de> Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Dmitry Markin <dmitry@markin.tech> Co-authored-by: Alexandru Vasile <60601340+lexnv@users.noreply.github.com> * Forward logging directives to Polkadot workers (paritytech#6534) This pull request forward all the logging directives given to the node via `RUST_LOG` or `-l` to the workers, instead of only forwarding `RUST_LOG`. --------- Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com> * Support block gap created by fast sync (paritytech#5703) This is part 2 of paritytech#5406 (comment), properly handling the block gap generated during fast sync. Although paritytech#5406 remains unresolved due to the known issues in paritytech#5663, I decided to open up this PR earlier than later to speed up the overall progress. I've tested the fast sync locally with this PR, and it appears to be functioning well. (I was doing a fast sync from a discontinued archive node locally, thus the issue highlighted in paritytech#5663 (comment) was bypassed exactly.) Once the edge cases in paritytech#5663 are addressed, we can move forward by removing the body attribute from the LightState block request and complete the work on paritytech#5406. The changes in this PR are incremental, so reviewing commit by commit should provide the best clarity. cc @dmitry-markin --------- Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de> * Pure state sync refactoring (part-2) (paritytech#6521) This PR is the second part of the pure state sync refactoring, encapsulating `StateSyncMetadata` as a separate entity. Now it's pretty straightforward what changes are needed for the persistent state sync as observed in the struct `StateSync`: - `state`: redirect directly to the DB layer instead of being accumulated in the memory. - `metadata`: handle the state sync metadata on disk whenever the state is forwarded to the DB, resume an ongoing state sync on a restart, etc. --------- Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de> Co-authored-by: Alexandru Vasile <60601340+lexnv@users.noreply.github.com> * Add and test events in `pallet-conviction-voting` (paritytech#6544) # Description paritytech#4613 introduced events for `pallet_conviction_voting::{vote, remove_vote, remove_other_vote}`. However: 1. it did not include `unlock` 2. the pallet's unit tests were missing an update ## Integration N/A ## Review Notes This is as paritytech#6261 was, so it is a trivial change. * Increase default trie cache size to 1GiB (paritytech#6546) The default trie cache size before was set to `64MiB`, which is quite low to achieve real speed ups. `1GiB` should be a reasonable number as the requirements for validators/collators/full nodes are much higher when it comes to minimum memory requirements. Also the cache will not use `1GiB` from the start and fills over time. The setting can be changed by setting `--trie-cache-size BYTE_SIZE`. --------- Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com> * Bridges testing improvements (paritytech#6536) This PR includes: - Refactored integrity tests to support standalone deployment of `pallet-bridge-messages`. - Refactored the `open_and_close_bridge_works` test case to support multiple scenarios, such as: 1. A local chain opening a bridge. 2. Sibling parachains opening a bridge. 3. The relay chain opening a bridge. - Previously, we added instance support for `pallet-bridge-relayer` but overlooked updating the `DeliveryConfirmationPaymentsAdapter`. --------- Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com> * Migrate pallet-scheduler benchmark to v2 (paritytech#6292) Part of: - paritytech#6202. --------- Signed-off-by: Xavier Lau <x@acg.box> Co-authored-by: Giuseppe Re <giuseppe.re@parity.io> Co-authored-by: Guillaume Thiolliere <guillaume.thiolliere@parity.io> * Removes constraint in `BlockNumberProvider` from treasury (paritytech#6522) paritytech#3970 updated the treasury pallet to support relay chain block number provider. However, it added a constraint to the BlockNumberProvider to have the same block number type as frame_system: ```rust type BlockNumberProvider: BlockNumberProvider<BlockNumber = BlockNumberFor<Self>>; ``` This PR removes that constraint as suggested by @gui1117 * add profile * exclude trigger on push --------- Signed-off-by: Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io> Signed-off-by: georgepisaltu <george.pisaltu@parity.io> Signed-off-by: linning <linningde25@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Vasile <alexandru.vasile@parity.io> Signed-off-by: Xavier Lau <x@acg.box> Co-authored-by: Joseph Zhao <65984904+programskillforverification@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Giuseppe Re <giuseppe.re@parity.io> Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by: Alin Dima <alin@parity.io> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de> Co-authored-by: Nazar Mokrynskyi <nazar@mokrynskyi.com> Co-authored-by: Michal Kucharczyk <1728078+michalkucharczyk@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sebastian Kunert <skunert49@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io> Co-authored-by: jpserrat <35823283+jpserrat@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: davidk-pt <david.kazlauskas@parity.io> Co-authored-by: DavidK <davidk@parity.io> Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <5588131+kianenigma@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: clangenb <37865735+clangenb@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: PG Herveou <pgherveou@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Doordashcon <jesse.chejieh@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io> Co-authored-by: Xavier Lau <x@acg.box> Co-authored-by: Jeeyong Um <conr2d@proton.me> Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <franciscoaguirreperez@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Andrii <ndk@parity.io> Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Shawn Tabrizi <shawntabrizi@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Niklas Adolfsson <niklasadolfsson1@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Andrei Eres <eresav@me.com> Co-authored-by: Guillaume Thiolliere <gui.thiolliere@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Michał Gil <michal.gil@parity.io> Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <donal.murray@parity.io> Co-authored-by: Muharem <ismailov.m.h@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Kazunobu Ndong <33208377+ndkazu@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Dmitry Markin <dmitry@markin.tech> Co-authored-by: Alexandru Vasile <60601340+lexnv@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Stephane Gurgenidze <59443568+sw10pa@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: georgepisaltu <52418509+georgepisaltu@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Viraj Bhartiya <vlbhartiya@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alexander Samusev <41779041+alvicsam@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Iulian Barbu <14218860+iulianbarbu@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Cyrill Leutwiler <cyrill@parity.io> Co-authored-by: NingLin-P <ning@subspace.network> Co-authored-by: Tobi Demeco <50408393+TDemeco@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Guillaume Thiolliere <guillaume.thiolliere@parity.io> Co-authored-by: Liu-Cheng Xu <xuliuchengxlc@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Tsvetomir Dimitrov <tsvetomir@parity.io> Co-authored-by: Ermal Kaleci <ermalkaleci@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alexander Theißen <alex.theissen@me.com> Co-authored-by: tmpolaczyk <44604217+tmpolaczyk@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Maciej <maciej.zyszkiewicz@parity.io> Co-authored-by: ordian <write@reusable.software> Co-authored-by: Ankan <10196091+Ank4n@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Alexandre R. Baldé <alexandre.balde@parity.io> Co-authored-by: Xavier Lau <xavier@inv.cafe> Co-authored-by: gupnik <mail.guptanikhil@gmail.com>

ermalkaleci added 5 commits October 17, 2024 17:29

update delegate_call to take address and weight

acde6b4

fix fixtures

02dace6

Merge branch 'master' of github.com:ermalkaleci/polkadot-sdk into fea…

23b9319

…t/update-delegate-call

fix test

697422b

add prdoc

7f374c0

ermalkaleci changed the title ~~[pallet-revive] Update delegate_call to take address and weight~~ [pallet-revive] Update delegate_call to accept address and weight Oct 23, 2024

ermalkaleci added 2 commits October 23, 2024 20:04

fmt

4a29f0a

fmt

78d39c2

ermalkaleci marked this pull request as ready for review October 23, 2024 18:40

xermicus reviewed Oct 25, 2024

View reviewed changes

substrate/frame/revive/src/exec.rs Show resolved Hide resolved

prdoc/pr_6111.prdoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

ermalkaleci added 4 commits October 28, 2024 12:18

update prdoc

171167a

Merge branch 'master' of github.com:ermalkaleci/polkadot-sdk into fea…

67174f0

…t/update-delegate-call

add option to limit storage deposit

f899e9e

clippy

a5f2f1c

xermicus added R0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes T7-smart_contracts This PR/Issue is related to smart contracts. labels Oct 30, 2024

athei requested changes Oct 30, 2024

View reviewed changes

substrate/frame/revive/src/wasm/runtime.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

ermalkaleci added 2 commits October 31, 2024 13:31

fix immutable read on delegate call

c05bd51

Merge branch 'master' of github.com:ermalkaleci/polkadot-sdk into fea…

ea118a0

…t/update-delegate-call

ermalkaleci requested review from athei and xermicus October 31, 2024 13:00

athei reviewed Oct 31, 2024

View reviewed changes

substrate/frame/revive/src/exec.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

Revert "refactor"

bb79cda

This reverts commit 46af335.

merge caller and callee into delegate info

fc6a762

athei reviewed Nov 6, 2024

View reviewed changes

ermalkaleci added 2 commits November 6, 2024 13:53

apply suggestion

7073ee3

add deposit_limit test

9f06a03

ermalkaleci requested a review from athei November 6, 2024 16:09

fmt

95d1ffd

athei reviewed Nov 6, 2024

View reviewed changes

athei approved these changes Nov 12, 2024

View reviewed changes

athei requested a review from pgherveou November 12, 2024 11:22

pgherveou approved these changes Nov 18, 2024

View reviewed changes

Merge branch 'master' into feat/update-delegate-call

aee61a6

athei enabled auto-merge November 18, 2024 17:58

athei and others added 2 commits November 18, 2024 19:42

Merge branch 'master' into feat/update-delegate-call

20767b6

fix test

5c1f1ed

auto-merge was automatically disabled November 19, 2024 07:40
Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access

athei added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 19, 2024

Merged via the queue into paritytech:master with commit 293d4a5 Nov 19, 2024
193 of 198 checks passed

ermalkaleci deleted the feat/update-delegate-call branch November 19, 2024 12:11

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[pallet-revive] Update delegate_call to accept address and weight #6111

[pallet-revive] Update delegate_call to accept address and weight #6111

ermalkaleci commented Oct 17, 2024 •

edited

Loading

ermalkaleci commented Oct 24, 2024

athei left a comment

ermalkaleci commented Oct 30, 2024

athei commented Oct 30, 2024

ermalkaleci commented Oct 30, 2024

athei commented Oct 30, 2024

ermalkaleci commented Oct 31, 2024

athei commented Oct 31, 2024

athei left a comment

athei commented Oct 31, 2024

ermalkaleci commented Oct 31, 2024 •

edited

Loading

athei commented Oct 31, 2024

athei commented Oct 31, 2024

athei left a comment

ermalkaleci commented Nov 6, 2024

ermalkaleci commented Nov 6, 2024

athei Nov 6, 2024

ermalkaleci Nov 6, 2024

athei Nov 11, 2024

ermalkaleci Nov 11, 2024

athei Nov 12, 2024

athei commented Nov 6, 2024 •

edited

Loading

ermalkaleci commented Nov 7, 2024

athei left a comment

pgherveou commented Nov 18, 2024

substrate-tip-bot bot commented Nov 18, 2024

[pallet-revive] Update delegate_call to accept address and weight #6111

[pallet-revive] Update delegate_call to accept address and weight #6111

Conversation

ermalkaleci commented Oct 17, 2024 • edited Loading

ermalkaleci commented Oct 24, 2024

athei left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

ermalkaleci commented Oct 30, 2024

athei commented Oct 30, 2024

ermalkaleci commented Oct 30, 2024

athei commented Oct 30, 2024

ermalkaleci commented Oct 31, 2024

athei commented Oct 31, 2024

athei left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

athei commented Oct 31, 2024

ermalkaleci commented Oct 31, 2024 • edited Loading

athei commented Oct 31, 2024

athei commented Oct 31, 2024

athei left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

ermalkaleci commented Nov 6, 2024

ermalkaleci commented Nov 6, 2024

athei Nov 6, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

ermalkaleci Nov 6, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

athei Nov 11, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

ermalkaleci Nov 11, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

athei Nov 12, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

athei commented Nov 6, 2024 • edited Loading

ermalkaleci commented Nov 7, 2024

athei left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

pgherveou commented Nov 18, 2024

substrate-tip-bot bot commented Nov 18, 2024

ermalkaleci commented Oct 17, 2024 •

edited

Loading

ermalkaleci commented Oct 31, 2024 •

edited

Loading

athei commented Nov 6, 2024 •

edited

Loading