-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
Conversation
Ideally, |
fair I will close the other PR and rebase this one on master |
4b3c5c4
to
164b885
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How's this tested or do we have a wat fixture for this in master already?
@xermicus what kind of .wat do we write to proof that we support signed_extension? |
Probably something very similar to what wasmi uses to test it should work
|
Co-authored-by: Sasha Gryaznov <hi@agryaznov.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM I don't give it the green check mark cause of @agryaznov's comment
bot merge |
* Contracts enable signed extension * Add test * fix * xx * Update frame/contracts/fixtures/sign_extension.wat Co-authored-by: Sasha Gryaznov <hi@agryaznov.com> * move tests --------- Co-authored-by: Sasha Gryaznov <hi@agryaznov.com>
* Contracts enable signed extension * Add test * fix * xx * Update frame/contracts/fixtures/sign_extension.wat Co-authored-by: Sasha Gryaznov <hi@agryaznov.com> * move tests --------- Co-authored-by: Sasha Gryaznov <hi@agryaznov.com>
Ideally we fix my other PR #14563 so we can have a test that verify that an Ink contract compiled with 1.70 works properly