-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: what is PoP, what it can be #12
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
Btw, we are assuming here that the credential for which a Status Attestation is requested has a cryptographic holder-binding. Is this a right assumption? Should we generalize to cases where we have other holder binding mechanisms or even none?
@fmarino-ipzs This pull request addresses a limitation of the current specification. It currently only works with digital credentials that contain holder key binding. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
minor word changes, ideally we don't need to distinguish "owner" and "subject", and "ownership" and "possession".
Co-authored-by: Orie Steele <orie@or13.io>
this PR closes #11