executor,sessionctx: refine output format for tidb-specific variables of boolean type

[spongedu]

What problem does this PR solve?

Currently, the result of selecting tidb-specific variables of boolean type is not well formatted. I think we'd better make it same style with MySQL. For example:

tidb> set @@tidb_batch_delete='On';
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)

tidb> select @@tidb_batch_delete;
+---------------------+
| @@tidb_batch_delete |
+---------------------+
| On                  |
+---------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

tidb> set @@tidb_enable_streaming='OfF'
    -> ;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)

tidb> select @@tidb_enable_streaming;
+-------------------------+
| @@tidb_enable_streaming |
+-------------------------+
| OfF                     |
+-------------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

tidb> set @@tidb_disable_txn_auto_retry=on;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)

tidb> select @@tidb_disable_txn_auto_retry;
+-------------------------------+
| @@tidb_disable_txn_auto_retry |
+-------------------------------+
| ON                            |
+-------------------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

tidb> set @@tidb_batch_insert=0;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)

tidb> select @@tidb_batch_insert;
+---------------------+
| @@tidb_batch_insert |
+---------------------+
| 0                   |
+---------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

What is changed and how it works?

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)

Code changes

N / A

Side effects

N / A

Related changes

N / A

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@9b82445). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             master     #11239   +/-   ##
===========================================
  Coverage          ?   81.5579%           
===========================================
  Files             ?        423           
  Lines             ?      90993           
  Branches          ?          0           
===========================================
  Hits              ?      74212           
  Misses            ?      11493           
  Partials          ?       5288

[spongedu]

/run-all-tests

[wshwsh12]

LGTM

[XuHuaiyu]

LGTM

[jackysp]

LGTM

[jackysp]

Thanks @spongedu !

[sre-bot]

It seems that, not for sure, we failed to cherry-pick this commit to release-2.1 release-3.0. Please comment '/run-cherry-picker' to try to trigger the cherry-picker if we did fail to cherry-pick this commit before. @wshwsh12 PTAL.

[wshwsh12]

/run-cherry-picker

[sre-bot]

cherry pick to release-2.1 in PR #16131

[sre-bot]

cherry pick to release-3.0 in PR #16132

[sre-bot]

cherry pick to release-3.1 in PR #16133