Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

util: avoid column allocator reuse the column hold huge memory (#32554) #32577

Closed

Conversation

ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

@ti-srebot ti-srebot commented Feb 23, 2022

cherry-pick #32554 to release-5.3
You can switch your code base to this Pull Request by using git-extras:

# In tidb repo:
git pr https://github.com/pingcap/tidb/pull/32577

After apply modifications, you can push your change to this PR via:

git push git@github.com:ti-srebot/tidb.git pr/32577:release-5.3-cce1ebdebb16

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #31981
close #30880

Problem Summary:
Chunk-rpc will use rpc message to construct chunk directly, which will hold the whole memory.
We should release them after the sql finished.

What is changed and how it works?

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Fix the problem of tidb oom when exporting data using chunk rpc

Signed-off-by: ti-srebot <ti-srebot@pingcap.com>
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has not been approved.

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels Feb 23, 2022
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. and removed do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels Feb 23, 2022
@ti-srebot ti-srebot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. type/5.3-cherry-pick labels Feb 23, 2022
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor Author

@wshwsh12 you're already a collaborator in bot's repo.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 23, 2022
@tiancaiamao
Copy link
Contributor

5.3 is not affected

@tiancaiamao tiancaiamao deleted the release-5.3-cce1ebdebb16 branch April 24, 2022 07:36
@VelocityLight VelocityLight added cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. and removed do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved labels Jun 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. type/5.3-cherry-pick
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants