Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Log Backup: decouple log backup resolve locks from GCWorker. #45904

Merged
merged 56 commits into from
Sep 12, 2023

Conversation

3pointer
Copy link
Contributor

@3pointer 3pointer commented Aug 8, 2023

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #40759
Problem Summary:
#35403 introduce 1 minute scan locks of the whole cluster in GCWorker. which will cost CPU when cluster has large number of regions. This PR try to decouple it.

What is changed and how it works?

  1. Record checkpoint and move resolve locks in advancer.
  2. Abstract GCWorkerLockResolver used for LogBackup/GCWorker/GCWorkerTest. move ResolveLocksForRange into gcutil.go to avoid cycle import.
 GCLockResolver is used for GCWorker and log backup advancer to resolve locks.
// #Note: Put it here to avoid cycle import
ype GCLockResolver interface {
 	// ResolveLocks tries to resolve expired locks.
 	// 1. For GCWorker it will scan locks for all regions before *safepoint*,
 	// and force remove locks. rollback the txn, no matter the lock is expired of not.
 	// 2. For log backup advancer, it will scan all locks for a small range.
 	// and it will check status of the txn. resolve the locks if txn is expired, Or do nothing.
 	ResolveLocks(*tikv.Backoffer, []*txnlock.Lock, tikv.RegionVerID) (bool, error)

 	// ScanLocks only used for mock test.
 	ScanLocks([]byte, uint64) []*txnlock.Lock
 	// We need to get tikvStore to build rangerunner.
 	// TODO: the most code is in client.go and the store is only used to locate end keys of a region.
 	// maybe we can move GCLockResolver into client.go.
 	GetStore() tikv.Storage
 }
  1. Remove logbackup logic in GCWorker.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    before this PR, resolve lock every minutes
image

with this PR. resolve lock every 10 minutes. which will save CPU usage.
image

and check lock resolved.
image

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

Decouple log backup resolve locks from GCWorker to save TiKV CPU usage.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Aug 8, 2023

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. needs-cherry-pick-release-6.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-6.5 branch. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. needs-cherry-pick-release-7.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-7.1 branch. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 8, 2023
@tiprow
Copy link

tiprow bot commented Aug 8, 2023

Hi @3pointer. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@3pointer
Copy link
Contributor Author

3pointer commented Aug 9, 2023

/ok-to-test

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the ok-to-test Indicates a PR is ready to be tested. label Aug 9, 2023
@3pointer
Copy link
Contributor Author

/ok-to-test

Copy link
Contributor

@MyonKeminta MyonKeminta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The GCWorker part LGTM.

Copy link
Contributor

@YuJuncen YuJuncen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

rest lgtm

@@ -503,7 +505,8 @@ func (c *CheckpointAdvancer) optionalTick(cx context.Context) error {
// lastCheckpoint is not increased too long enough.
// assume the cluster has expired locks for whatever reasons.
var targets []spans.Valued
if c.lastCheckpoint != nil && c.lastCheckpoint.needResolveLocks() {
if c.lastCheckpoint != nil && c.lastCheckpoint.needResolveLocks() && !c.inResolvingLock.Load() {
c.inResolvingLock.Store(true)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Better to CompareAndSwap here.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added approved needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. labels Sep 11, 2023
@tiprow
Copy link

tiprow bot commented Sep 11, 2023

@3pointer: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
tiprow_fast_test be0c535 link true /test tiprow_fast_test

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

br/pkg/streamhelper/advancer.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
br/pkg/streamhelper/advancer.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the lgtm label Sep 12, 2023
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Sep 12, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Leavrth, YuJuncen

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot removed the needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. label Sep 12, 2023
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Sep 12, 2023

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2023-09-11 06:55:56.54715264 +0000 UTC m=+252338.471709030: ☑️ agreed by YuJuncen.
  • 2023-09-12 06:45:13.323690821 +0000 UTC m=+338095.248247215: ☑️ agreed by Leavrth.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-6.5: #46893.

ti-chi-bot pushed a commit to ti-chi-bot/tidb that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2023
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-7.1: #46894.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved lgtm needs-cherry-pick-release-6.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-6.5 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-7.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-7.1 branch. ok-to-test Indicates a PR is ready to be tested. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

txn: unexpected high frequency gc
6 participants