executor: fix negative consumedbyte for hashRowcontainer

[wshwsh12]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #50841

Problem Summary:

What changed and how does it work?

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
• No need to test

  • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

• Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
• Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
• Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

• Affects user behaviors
• Contains syntax changes
• Contains variable changes
• Contains experimental features
• Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

Fix the issue that goroutine leak when hashJoin triggered spill and sql failed

[tiprow]

Hi @wshwsh12. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #50843 (5d55642) into master (4e41699) will increase coverage by 0.4699%.
Report is 11 commits behind head on master.
The diff coverage is 50.0000%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #50843        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   72.2282%   72.6981%   +0.4699%     
================================================
  Files          1465       1466         +1     
  Lines        360597     435473     +74876     
================================================
+ Hits         260453     316581     +56128     
- Misses        80883      99011     +18128     
- Partials      19261      19881       +620     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	49.2368% <50.0000%> (?)
unit	70.3535% <50.0000%> (-1.7553%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
dumpling	54.2940% <ø> (-2.1832%)	⬇️
parser	∅ <ø> (∅)
br	51.3913% <ø> (+5.1434%)	⬆️

[ti-chi-bot]

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

• 2024-01-31 07:48:53.060011797 +0000 UTC m=+1551774.624309503: ☑️ agreed by XuHuaiyu.
• 2024-01-31 09:14:42.978148252 +0000 UTC m=+1556924.542445942: ☑️ agreed by guo-shaoge.

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: AilinKid, guo-shaoge, XuHuaiyu

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [AilinKid,XuHuaiyu,guo-shaoge]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[ti-chi-bot]

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-7.5: #50934.

[ti-chi-bot]

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-7.1: #51189.

[ti-chi-bot]

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-6.5: #51190.

[wshwsh12]

/cherry-pick release-6.5-20231229-v6.5.6

[ti-chi-bot]

@wshwsh12: new pull request created to branch release-6.5-20231229-v6.5.6: #53344.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-6.5-20231229-v6.5.6

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.