-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
expression: use the correct type when eval decimal and float session var #51395
Conversation
Signed-off-by: hi-rustin <rustin.liu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: hi-rustin <rustin.liu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: hi-rustin <rustin.liu@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/retest |
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #51395 +/- ##
================================================
+ Coverage 70.6663% 73.0898% +2.4235%
================================================
Files 1461 1462 +1
Lines 434876 442198 +7322
================================================
+ Hits 307311 323202 +15891
+ Misses 108307 99059 -9248
- Partials 19258 19937 +679
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
/retest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@@ -1052,7 +1052,11 @@ func (b *builtinGetRealVarSig) evalReal(ctx EvalContext, row chunk.Row) (float64 | |||
} | |||
varName = strings.ToLower(varName) | |||
if v, ok := sessionVars.GetUserVarVal(varName); ok { | |||
return v.GetFloat64(), false, nil |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What about the implementation of (b *builtinGetRealVarSig) vecEvalReal
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Because this PR: #8412
There is no way to vectorized eval real. But I guess it makes sense to update it as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, please. Much appreciated.
Let's talk about enabling vectorization for get/set var function in the future.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there any case we can add into this UT:
tidb/pkg/expression/builtin_other_test.go
Line 118 in 27ce02a
func TestGetVar(t *testing.T) { |
As well as https://github.com/pingcap/tidb/blob/27ce02afd2e3d312b2bb92e20489cefce000e320/pkg/expression/builtin_other_vec_test.go , assuming you are going to add vectorized version of
builtinGetRealVarSig
.
@@ -1052,7 +1052,11 @@ func (b *builtinGetRealVarSig) evalReal(ctx EvalContext, row chunk.Row) (float64 | |||
} | |||
varName = strings.ToLower(varName) | |||
if v, ok := sessionVars.GetUserVarVal(varName); ok { | |||
return v.GetFloat64(), false, nil |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1
Signed-off-by: hi-rustin <rustin.liu@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🔢 Self-check
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: AilinKid, elsa0520, zanmato1984 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
[LGTM Timeline notifier]Timeline:
|
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #43527
Problem Summary:
What changed and how does it work?
In the SQL,
@total
type is int64, but when we do eval decimal we will directly convert it as decimal then we will get a panic because there is nox
for int value.GetMysqlDecimal:
ToDecimal:
So we have to try to convert it explicitly.
Same for the float value eval process. We also need to convert it.
Because #8412 disabled the vectorized execution of get or set variable, so we don't really execute that code right now. But I also updated it.
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.