Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

statistics: avoid stats meta full load after table analysis #57756

Merged

Conversation

Rustin170506
Copy link
Member

@Rustin170506 Rustin170506 commented Nov 27, 2024

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #57631

Problem Summary:

See more at #57631 (comment)

We need to support updating the stats of only a few tables within the update function. This will help reduce the function's duration after the table analysis is completed.

The analysis duration is stable:

mysql> analyze table sbtest111.sbtest2;
Query OK, 0 rows affected, 10 warnings (6.22 sec)

mysql> analyze table sbtest111.sbtest2;
Query OK, 0 rows affected, 10 warnings (6.74 sec)

mysql> analyze table sbtest111.sbtest2;
Query OK, 0 rows affected, 10 warnings (6.12 sec)

What changed and how does it work?

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No need to test
    • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added do-not-merge/needs-triage-completed release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/planner SIG: Planner size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed do-not-merge/needs-triage-completed labels Nov 27, 2024
@Rustin170506
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 27, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 95.65217% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 73.8288%. Comparing base (8fe0618) to head (3808148).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #57756        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   73.1430%   73.8288%   +0.6858%     
================================================
  Files          1671       1701        +30     
  Lines        460633     468749      +8116     
================================================
+ Hits         336921     346072      +9151     
+ Misses       103006     101245      -1761     
- Partials      20706      21432       +726     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 46.1426% <72.4637%> (?)
unit 72.2917% <95.6521%> (+0.0113%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
dumpling 52.7673% <ø> (ø)
parser ∅ <ø> (∅)
br 46.0253% <ø> (+0.0331%) ⬆️

Copy link
Member Author

@Rustin170506 Rustin170506 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔢 Self-check (PR reviewed by myself and ready for feedback.)

@@ -99,6 +99,14 @@ func (e *AnalyzeExec) Next(ctx context.Context, _ *chunk.Chunk) error {
if len(tasks) == 0 {
return nil
}
tableAndPartitionIDs := make([]int64, 0, len(tasks))
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe we can get this information from the previous function, but I’d prefer not to introduce extra refactoring in this PR since we need to cherry-pick it to 8.5.

Signed-off-by: Rustin170506 <tech@rustin.me>
Signed-off-by: Rustin170506 <tech@rustin.me>
Signed-off-by: Rustin170506 <tech@rustin.me>
Signed-off-by: Rustin170506 <tech@rustin.me>
@Rustin170506 Rustin170506 force-pushed the rustin-patch-analysis-full-load branch from 675167d to 519a0d6 Compare November 28, 2024 03:37
Signed-off-by: Rustin170506 <tech@rustin.me>
Signed-off-by: Rustin170506 <tech@rustin.me>
@Rustin170506 Rustin170506 force-pushed the rustin-patch-analysis-full-load branch from fa1f501 to 8576b1e Compare November 28, 2024 11:30
Signed-off-by: Rustin170506 <tech@rustin.me>
Signed-off-by: Rustin170506 <tech@rustin.me>
@Rustin170506
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

Copy link
Member Author

@Rustin170506 Rustin170506 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔢 Self-check (PR reviewed by myself and ready for feedback.)

@Rustin170506
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added approved needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. labels Dec 2, 2024
Copy link
Member

@time-and-fate time-and-fate left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Others LGTM.

pkg/statistics/handle/storage/read.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Rustin170506 <tech@rustin.me>
Copy link
Member

@time-and-fate time-and-fate left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/hold

pkg/statistics/handle/types/interfaces.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/statistics/handle/storage/update.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 2, 2024
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Dec 2, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: time-and-fate, winoros

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added lgtm and removed needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. labels Dec 2, 2024
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Dec 2, 2024

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2024-12-02 06:53:40.061517703 +0000 UTC m=+1051407.681172220: ☑️ agreed by winoros.
  • 2024-12-02 14:03:54.941472793 +0000 UTC m=+1077222.561127308: ☑️ agreed by time-and-fate.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the needs-cherry-pick-release-8.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-8.5 branch. label Dec 3, 2024
Signed-off-by: Rustin170506 <tech@rustin.me>
Copy link
Member Author

@Rustin170506 Rustin170506 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔢 Self-check (PR reviewed by myself and ready for feedback.)

@Rustin170506
Copy link
Member Author

/unhold

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 3, 2024
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit f585f5d into pingcap:master Dec 3, 2024
25 checks passed
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-8.5: #57911.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved lgtm needs-cherry-pick-release-8.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-8.5 branch. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/planner SIG: Planner size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Analyze is too slow when run dml in million tables scenario
4 participants