New Ad4Game adapter for Prebid.js 1.0

[adilets]

Type of change

• Bugfix
• Feature
• [ x] New bidder adapter https://github.com/prebid/prebid.github.io/pull/333/files
• Code style update (formatting, local variables)
• Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
• Build related changes
• CI related changes
• Other

Description of change

Adding new bidder adapter for A4G

• test parameters for validating bids

{
  bidder: 'a4g',
  params: {
    zoneId: 59304,
    deliveryUrl: 'http://dev01.ad4game.com/v1/bid'
}

Be sure to test the integration with your adserver using the Hello World sample page.

• contact email of the adapter’s maintainer: adilet@ad4game.com, jaafar@ad4game.com, tech@ad4game.com
• official adapter submission

Other information

[adilets]

Hi @matthewlane. I created new PR from (#1650).

About response, you should use real domain instead of localhost when you testing. In my case I use xmmorpg.com domain. I rewrite localhost to this domain.

Thank you

[dbemiller]

About response, you should use real domain instead of localhost when you testing. In my case I use xmmorpg.com domain. I rewrite localhost to this domain.

hey @adilets, could you add a note about this in your .md file? It's nice to have more permanent documentation about caveats like this when we re-test 6 months from now.

[matthewlane]

I'm able to receive bid responses from your endpoint after rewriting localhost to the test domain. This uncovered a problem with bid id matching but I've noted a fix for this below

[matthewlane]

request is whatever was returned from the buildRequests function, which currently isn't returning a bidId. This causes the bids for your adapter to not get matched up, making it appear there was no bid response even though your endpoint is successfully returning bids. Make sure to make bidId available so that this will work, see other comment for possible approaches

[matthewlane]

One way to do it is to add bidId to this object, and set it's value to the bid id of validBidRequests (bidId: validBidRequests[0] && validBidRequests[0].bidId in that case). Then bidId will be available on the request parameter in interpretResponse and line 61 will work without modification. You can do it however you'd prefer though

[matthewlane]

Please add a note about rewriting localhost to the test domain in order to receive bids

[adilets]

@matthewlane Thanks for your review and comments. I updated PR.