Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update ixBidAdapter.md #2598

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 29, 2018
Merged

Update ixBidAdapter.md #2598

merged 1 commit into from
May 29, 2018

Conversation

ptim
Copy link
Contributor

@ptim ptim commented May 23, 2018

Type of change

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • New bidder adapter
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Does this change affect user-facing APIs or examples documented on http://prebid.org?
  • Other: adapter documentation

Description of change

Clarify use of siteId and fix mismatch of siteId for 'flex position' units based on documentation emailed out:
https://gallery.mailchimp.com/41ac5884406c48bd6f31af7a1/files/09ffb712-5455-4c0c-8453-592c5a3bcb67/Prebid_1.0_Upgrade_Doc_052118_v2.pdf

Further clarification is recommended, given the comment in the FAQ:

An IX site ID maps to a single size, whereas an ad unit can have multiple sizes. To ensure that the right site ID is mapped to the correct size in the ad unit we require the size to be explicitly stated.

...which contradicts the statement in the upgrade documentation linked above, which states:

Please note that you can re-use the existing siteId within the same flex position.

Contact email of the adapter’s maintainer: prebid.support@indexexchange.com

For any changes that affect user-facing APIs or example code documented on http://prebid.org, please provide:

Other information

@indexexchange

Clarify use of `siteId` and fix mismatch of `siteId` for 'flex position' units based on documentation emailed out:
https://gallery.mailchimp.com/41ac5884406c48bd6f31af7a1/files/09ffb712-5455-4c0c-8453-592c5a3bcb67/Prebid_1.0_Upgrade_Doc_052118_v2.pdf

Further clarification is recommended, given the comment in the FAQ:

> An IX site ID maps to a single size, whereas an ad unit can have multiple sizes. To ensure that the right site ID is mapped to the correct size in the ad unit we require the size to be explicitly stated.

...which contradicts the statement in the upgrade documentation linked above, which states:

> Please note that you can re-use the existing `siteId` within the same flex position.
@ptim
Copy link
Contributor Author

ptim commented May 24, 2018

CC @ix-prebid-support

@jsnellbaker jsnellbaker self-requested a review May 24, 2018 14:31
Copy link
Collaborator

@jsnellbaker jsnellbaker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@snapwich snapwich merged commit d3cfafa into prebid:master May 29, 2018
Pupis pushed a commit to adform/Prebid.js that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2018
dluxemburg pushed a commit to Genius/Prebid.js that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2018
ghost pushed a commit to devunrulymedia/Prebid.js that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants