Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

nil attestation tests added #5457

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 16, 2020
Merged

Conversation

farazdagi
Copy link
Contributor

Resolves #5427

The issue itself (checking for nil) was resolved in #5127 by Terence, this PR just adds necessary regression tests + minor refactoring to check for nil values a bit earlier in the function.

@farazdagi farazdagi requested a review from a team as a code owner April 16, 2020 15:22
@farazdagi farazdagi self-assigned this Apr 16, 2020
Copy link
Member

@terencechain terencechain left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 16, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #5457 into master will decrease coverage by 15.32%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5457       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   54.66%   39.34%   -15.33%     
===========================================
  Files         308      235       -73     
  Lines       24662    19834     -4828     
===========================================
- Hits        13481     7803     -5678     
- Misses       9246    10575     +1329     
+ Partials     1935     1456      -479     

@prylabs-bulldozer prylabs-bulldozer bot merged commit 075d29f into master Apr 16, 2020
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the nil-attestation-fields branch April 16, 2020 15:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

SIGSEGV in onAttestation() method
2 participants