-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Check that the headers are equal while ignoring the signature for proposer slashings #7252
Merged
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
fcd0dff
Check that the headers are equal while ignoring the signature for pro…
prestonvanloon 4c430d3
Merge refs/heads/master into fix-proposer-slashing-issue
prylabs-bulldozer[bot] 3158250
fix test
prestonvanloon 23a175c
Merge branch 'fix-proposer-slashing-issue' of github.com:prysmaticlab…
prestonvanloon de22345
Merge refs/heads/master into fix-proposer-slashing-issue
prylabs-bulldozer[bot] 39d6ecd
Merge refs/heads/master into fix-proposer-slashing-issue
prylabs-bulldozer[bot] b50da6c
Merge refs/heads/master into fix-proposer-slashing-issue
prylabs-bulldozer[bot] eb63e0a
Merge refs/heads/master into fix-proposer-slashing-issue
prylabs-bulldozer[bot] cc05b93
Merge refs/heads/master into fix-proposer-slashing-issue
prylabs-bulldozer[bot] c2cca03
Merge refs/heads/master into fix-proposer-slashing-issue
prylabs-bulldozer[bot] 54b9246
Merge refs/heads/master into fix-proposer-slashing-issue
prylabs-bulldozer[bot] 13e6798
Merge refs/heads/master into fix-proposer-slashing-issue
prylabs-bulldozer[bot] b93e8b9
Merge refs/heads/master into fix-proposer-slashing-issue
prylabs-bulldozer[bot] c0a3f85
Merge refs/heads/master into fix-proposer-slashing-issue
prylabs-bulldozer[bot] 7f7b1bf
Merge refs/heads/master into fix-proposer-slashing-issue
prylabs-bulldozer[bot] a2518ba
Merge refs/heads/master into fix-proposer-slashing-issue
prylabs-bulldozer[bot] File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we should use our assertion library over here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does the assertion library support this behavior?
I want: "if the test expects an error, assert the error is as expected"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not yet, it does have
assert.ErrorContains
which would be the closest to it. But yeah maybe not worth it to change now.