(PE-35600) Provide response object to handler when :include-response? #250
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is just one way we might solve the problem, and the *pdb-response* binding is just there to support the original investigation, without having to rework pdb's query handlers to accept the additional argument. Presumably we'll remove that if we decide to pursue these changes.
|
|
rbrw
added a commit
to rbrw/puppetdb
that referenced
this pull request
May 17, 2023
Depends on puppetlabs/trapperkeeper-webserver-jetty9#250 and if pursued, reworking the handler to accept the :include-response? argument.
|
Continued as #251 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is just one way we might solve the problem, and the pdb-response binding is just there to support the original investigation, without having to rework pdb's query handlers to accept the additional argument. Presumably we'll remove that if we decide to pursue these changes.