Move static content site commands to tags

[Numerlor]

Creates the resources, faq and tools tags from the corresponding site commands and the site tag from the home/about command. The rules command was moved to the Information cog, and site help was removed along with the cog.

closes: #1473

[Numerlor]

I've only moved the content to the bodies of the tags so far, do we also want to have a "title" in the tags?

[ToxicKidz]

do we also want to have a "title" in the tags?

How would this work? Currently we don't have embed titles for tags, unless you mean we should make the start of the files **title**, which I think would be a good idea.

[jb3]

We could use a similar approach to the branding repo and put the tag metadata in the YAML frontmatter of the markdown documents.

For example:

---
title: How to get rich, fast.
---
1. Buy stonks
2. Watch stonks
3. ????
4. Profit

[Numerlor]

We could use a similar approach to the branding repo and put the tag metadata in the YAML frontmatter of the markdown documents.

For example:

---
title: How to get rich, fast.
---
1. Buy stonks
2. Watch stonks
3. ????
4. Profit

I was only planning to do it with a bold text at the start like in ToxicKidz' comment, but implementing this shouldn't be too hard and will give more flexibility around tags in general so I'll do that.
Should the URLs also be moved to the title? I think it is a bit clearer inline but it may be worth it to have them in both places

[jb3]

I was only planning to do it with a bold text at the start like in ToxicKidz' comment, but implementing this shouldn't be too hard and will give more flexibility around tags in general so I'll do that.

Thinking about it, that is likely out of scope for this specific PR. Maybe we group that in with #1545 so we can have richer tag data.

Should the URLs also be moved to the title?

Up to you, I know that the URL embeds don't look too great, and I think that the inline hyperlinks looks fine.

[Numerlor]

I'll wait for the feature to go through then

[Akarys42]

LGTM

[Akarys42]

I don't think we should wait for tag grouping before moving along with this. It wouldn't change anything about the current functionality, we can group them later on when we merge the other PR.

[Numerlor]

I don't think we should wait for tag grouping before moving along with this. It wouldn't change anything about the current functionality, we can group them later on when we merge the other PR.

The PR is stalled because the group PR should also introduce the ability to pass in embed arguments through the tag file to be used as titles, after the issue is approved. I suppose it could also be done in a PR separate from the grouping functionality but I don't think it'd be worth complicating it just to merge this PR

[onerandomusername]

Looks good, one detail.

Testing the current behavior with the soon-to-be-removed site command, and noticing, with buttons, being able to link tags and get a nice view like this but with tags would be awesome.

[mbaruh]

@Numerlor since the tags PR is merged I removed the stalled label.

[Numerlor]

@Numerlor since the tags PR is merged I removed the stalled label.

should be good to go now

[ChrisLovering]

Tested and all works good, bar my one comment.