-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pygettext: false positives when extracting messages #126807
Comments
serhiy-storchaka
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 14, 2024
…n definitions. (GH-126808) Fixes a bug where pygettext would attempt to extract a message from a code like this: def _(x): pass This is because pygettext only looks at one token at a time and '_(x)' looks like a function call. However, since 'x' is not a string literal, it would erroneously issue a warning.
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this issue
Nov 14, 2024
…unction definitions. (pythonGH-126808) Fixes a bug where pygettext would attempt to extract a message from a code like this: def _(x): pass This is because pygettext only looks at one token at a time and '_(x)' looks like a function call. However, since 'x' is not a string literal, it would erroneously issue a warning. (cherry picked from commit 9a45638) Co-authored-by: Tomas R. <tomas.roun8@gmail.com>
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this issue
Nov 14, 2024
…unction definitions. (pythonGH-126808) Fixes a bug where pygettext would attempt to extract a message from a code like this: def _(x): pass This is because pygettext only looks at one token at a time and '_(x)' looks like a function call. However, since 'x' is not a string literal, it would erroneously issue a warning. (cherry picked from commit 9a45638) Co-authored-by: Tomas R. <tomas.roun8@gmail.com>
serhiy-storchaka
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 14, 2024
…function definitions. (GH-126808) (GH-126847) Fixes a bug where pygettext would attempt to extract a message from a code like this: def _(x): pass This is because pygettext only looks at one token at a time and '_(x)' looks like a function call. However, since 'x' is not a string literal, it would erroneously issue a warning. (cherry picked from commit 9a45638) Co-authored-by: Tomas R <tomas.roun8@gmail.com>
serhiy-storchaka
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 14, 2024
…function definitions. (GH-126808) (GH-126846) Fixes a bug where pygettext would attempt to extract a message from a code like this: def _(x): pass This is because pygettext only looks at one token at a time and '_(x)' looks like a function call. However, since 'x' is not a string literal, it would erroneously issue a warning. (cherry picked from commit 9a45638) Co-authored-by: Tomas R <tomas.roun8@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Bug report
Bug description:
Originally came up here: #126755 (comment)
To summarize, pygettext produces a warning for this code:
The reason is that it confuses the function definition with a function call. I have a PR ready.
CPython versions tested on:
CPython main branch
Operating systems tested on:
Linux
Linked PRs
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: