-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gh-98703: Fix asyncio proactor_events calling _call_connection_lost multiple times #98704
gh-98703: Fix asyncio proactor_events calling _call_connection_lost multiple times #98704
Conversation
Fidget-Spinner
commented
Oct 26, 2022
•
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading
edited by bedevere-bot
- Issue: Consistent test failures in test test_asyncio.test_streams.test_drain_raises on Windows #98703
@kumaraditya303 I don't know why but this started showing on our tests after #98572. I can't tell if that PR introduced a bug or it just exposed something wrong with our implementation. IMO, it seems it's something wrong with our implementation. |
Seriously though this has uncovered another race in our implementation. The code does not guard against concurrent closing of the stream which leads to this failure. The Here's a better fix: diff --git a/Lib/asyncio/proactor_events.py b/Lib/asyncio/proactor_events.py
index 2685a3376c..c6aab408fc 100644
--- a/Lib/asyncio/proactor_events.py
+++ b/Lib/asyncio/proactor_events.py
@@ -152,6 +152,8 @@ def _force_close(self, exc):
self._loop.call_soon(self._call_connection_lost, exc)
def _call_connection_lost(self, exc):
+ if self._called_connection_lost:
+ return
try:
self._protocol.connection_lost(exc)
finally:
Feel free to update this PR with the patch above, I have verified this. |
Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2022-10-26-07-51-55.gh-issue-98703.0hW773.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-Authored-By: Kumar Aditya <59607654+kumaraditya303@users.noreply.github.com>
Awesome! Thank you for the fix. I was trying to find something more elegant but I'm a noob at asyncio internals :). Your fix is way nicer. |
Co-Authored-By: Kumar Aditya <59607654+kumaraditya303@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM thanks for the PR!
I created #98730 to add tests for this. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ironic.
Thanks @Fidget-Spinner for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.10, 3.11. |
Sorry @Fidget-Spinner, I had trouble checking out the |
GH-98753 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.10 branch. |
…lost multiple times (pythonGH-98704) Co-authored-by: Kumar Aditya <59607654+kumaraditya303@users.noreply.github.com> (cherry picked from commit 8a75542) Co-authored-by: Ken Jin <kenjin@python.org>
Thanks @Fidget-Spinner for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11. |
GH-98754 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.11 branch. |
…lost multiple times (pythonGH-98704) Co-authored-by: Kumar Aditya <59607654+kumaraditya303@users.noreply.github.com> (cherry picked from commit 8a75542) Co-authored-by: Ken Jin <kenjin@python.org>
…lost multiple times (pythonGH-98704) Co-authored-by: Kumar Aditya <59607654+kumaraditya303@users.noreply.github.com>