simplify babe genesis slot #1700
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: turuslan <turuslan.devbox@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: turuslan <turuslan.devbox@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: turuslan <turuslan.devbox@gmail.com> # Conflicts: # core/blockchain/block_tree.hpp # core/consensus/babe/impl/babe_config_repository_impl.cpp # core/consensus/babe/impl/babe_config_repository_impl.hpp # core/consensus/babe/impl/babe_impl.cpp # core/network/impl/synchronizer_impl.cpp # core/storage/predefined_keys.hpp
Signed-off-by: turuslan <turuslan.devbox@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: turuslan <turuslan.devbox@gmail.com> # Conflicts: # core/storage/trie_pruner/impl/recover_pruner_state.cpp # test/core/storage/trie_pruner/trie_pruner_test.cpp
Signed-off-by: turuslan <turuslan.devbox@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: turuslan <turuslan.devbox@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: turuslan <turuslan.devbox@gmail.com> # Conflicts: # core/consensus/babe/babe_util.hpp # core/consensus/babe/impl/babe_config_repository_impl.cpp # core/consensus/babe/impl/babe_config_repository_impl.hpp # core/consensus/babe/impl/babe_impl.cpp # core/consensus/babe/impl/block_appender_base.cpp # test/core/consensus/babe/babe_test.cpp # test/core/consensus/babe/block_executor_test.cpp # test/mock/core/consensus/babe/babe_util_mock.hpp
Signed-off-by: turuslan <turuslan.devbox@gmail.com> # Conflicts: # core/primitives/babe_configuration.hpp # core/runtime/runtime_api/impl/babe_api.cpp # core/runtime/runtime_api/impl/babe_api.hpp
Signed-off-by: turuslan <turuslan.devbox@gmail.com>
kamilsa
approved these changes
Aug 11, 2023
| outcome::result<EpochNumber> slotToEpoch( | ||
| const primitives::BlockInfo &parent_info, | ||
| BabeSlotNumber slot_number) const { | ||
| OUTCOME_TRY(epoch, slotToEpochDescriptor(parent_info, slot_number)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe for consistency and in case we want to mock this method, it makes sense to move implementation to babe_config_repository_impl?
kamilsa
requested review from
igor-egorov
and removed request for
Harrm and
xDimon
Signed-off-by: turuslan <turuslan.devbox@gmail.com> # Conflicts: # core/consensus/babe/impl/babe_impl.cpp # core/network/impl/synchronizer_impl.cpp
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Referenced issues
Description of the Change
BabeApi_next_epochresult inBabeIndexedValueafter warp sync (no babe digest after warp sync)Benefits
Possible Drawbacks