Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[3.2] Backports and Quarkus bump to 3.2.9 #1537

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Nov 21, 2023

Conversation

michalvavrik
Copy link
Member

@michalvavrik michalvavrik commented Nov 21, 2023

Summary

Contains:

Please select the relevant options.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Dependency update
  • Refactoring
  • Backport
  • New scenario (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • This change requires a documentation update
  • This change requires execution against OCP (use run tests phrase in comment)

Checklist:

  • Methods and classes used in PR scenarios are meaningful
  • Commits are well encapsulated and follow the best practices

@michalvavrik michalvavrik changed the title [3.2] Backports and Quarkus bump [3.2] Backports and Quarkus bump to 3.2.9 Nov 21, 2023
@michalvavrik
Copy link
Member Author

run tests

@michalvavrik michalvavrik requested a review from mocenas November 21, 2023 15:51
@michalvavrik
Copy link
Member Author

michalvavrik commented Nov 21, 2023

OCP JVM failures are flaky. I've meant to fix these 4 for ten times now, we really need to create task for it :-)

io.quarkus.ts.messaging.strimzi.kafka.reactive.OpenShiftAmqStreamsKafkaAvroIT.testAlertMonitorEventStream
io.quarkus.ts.messaging.strimzi.kafka.reactive.OpenShiftAmqStreamsKafkaAvroIT.batchMustBeGreaterThanSingleEvent
io.quarkus.ts.messaging.strimzi.kafka.reactive.OpenShiftStrimziKafkaAvroIT.testAlertMonitorEventStream
io.quarkus.ts.messaging.strimzi.kafka.reactive.OpenShiftStrimziKafkaAvroIT.batchMustBeGreaterThanSingleEvent

@michalvavrik
Copy link
Member Author

I think it would be great to run general trigger over night, I think I'll take responsibility on me. @mocenas could you still review tomorrow please? If you find something, I'll make tweaks tomorrow, thank you.

@michalvavrik michalvavrik merged commit 21ab26a into quarkus-qe:3.2 Nov 21, 2023
6 of 8 checks passed
@michalvavrik michalvavrik deleted the backports/3.2.9 branch November 21, 2023 17:55
Copy link
Contributor

@mocenas mocenas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've reviewed it, although it is already merged. Found no issues.

@michalvavrik
Copy link
Member Author

I've reviewed it, although it is already merged. Found no issues.

Thanks, appreciated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants