chore: use the nested if's linter to reduce complexity globally #1158
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Important Auto Review SkippedDraft detected. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the To trigger a single review, invoke the WalkthroughThe updates encompass a broad refinement of codebase practices, focusing on enhancing type safety, clarity, and maintainability. Key changes include the integration and removal of specific linters, transitioning from Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- .golangci.yml (3 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
.golangci.yml (1)
- 21-21: The addition of the
maintidxlinter is a positive change aimed at enhancing code maintainability checks. This aligns with the PR's objective to improve code quality and maintainability. Ensure that the project's CI pipeline is configured to handle the potential increase in analysis time due to the addition of this linter.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1158 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 63.60% 63.40% -0.21%
==========================================
Files 171 171
Lines 11652 11159 -493
==========================================
- Hits 7411 7075 -336
+ Misses 3497 3373 -124
+ Partials 744 711 -33
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 1
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- .golangci.yml (3 hunks)
Additional comments: 2
.golangci.yml (2)
- 23-23: The addition of the
nestiflinter is a positive change for enhancing code quality by identifying deeply nested if statements, which can complicate code readability and maintainability.- 29-29: Adding
testifylintto the list of linters is beneficial for projects using the Testify testing framework, as it can help enforce best practices and identify common mistakes in test code.
.golangci.yml
Outdated
| - name: unused-parameter # Disabled in favour of unparam. | ||
| disabled: true | ||
| - name: unhandled-error # enable later, currently covered by errcheck | ||
| - name: unhandled-error |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The explicit disabling of the unhandled-error rule with specific arguments indicates a targeted approach to ignore unhandled errors from certain functions. While this can be useful for reducing noise from known benign unhandled errors, it's important to ensure that this does not inadvertently mask genuine issues. Consider reviewing these exceptions periodically to ensure they remain valid.
Consider adding a comment explaining the rationale behind each ignored function to ensure future maintainability and understanding of these exceptions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 3
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (50)
- .golangci.yml (3 hunks)
- app/test_helpers.go (1 hunks)
- app/tps_counter_test.go (1 hunks)
- cmd/quicksilverd/root.go (1 hunks)
- icq-relayer/pkg/runner/run.go (1 hunks)
- server/config/config.go (1 hunks)
- test/simulation/simtypes/rand.go (1 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/balancer/pool_asset.go (1 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/osmomath/decimal.go (1 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/osmomath/int.go (1 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/osmoutils/cache_ctx.go (1 hunks)
- third-party-chains/osmosis-types/osmoutils/slice_helper.go (1 hunks)
- third-party-chains/umee-types/leverage/params.go (5 hunks)
- utils/sort.go (2 hunks)
- wasmbinding/query_plugin_test.go (2 hunks)
- wasmbinding/test/custom_query_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/airdrop/keeper/claim_handler.go (1 hunks)
- x/airdrop/keeper/zonedrop.go (4 hunks)
- x/airdrop/module.go (6 hunks)
- x/airdrop/types/airdrop.go (1 hunks)
- x/airdrop/types/msgs.go (2 hunks)
- x/airdrop/types/params.go (1 hunks)
- x/airdrop/types/proposals.go (1 hunks)
- x/claimsmanager/keeper/abci.go (1 hunks)
- x/claimsmanager/keeper/hooks.go (1 hunks)
- x/claimsmanager/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
- x/claimsmanager/keeper/keeper_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/claimsmanager/module.go (4 hunks)
- x/claimsmanager/types/params.go (1 hunks)
- x/epochs/types/identifier.go (1 hunks)
- x/interchainquery/genesis_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/interchainquery/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
- x/interchainquery/keeper/keeper_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/interchainquery/keeper/queries.go (1 hunks)
- x/interchainquery/types/callbacks.go (1 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/ibc_module.go (3 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/callbacks.go (1 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers.go (5 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/keeper_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/types/delegation.go (1 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/types/params.go (3 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/types/proposals_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/lsmtypes/msg.go (9 hunks)
- x/mint/types/params.go (6 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/keeper/callbacks.go (1 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/keeper/distribution.go (2 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/types/params.go (2 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/types/proposals_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/supply/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
- x/tokenfactory/types/params.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .golangci.yml
Additional comments: 95
x/claimsmanager/keeper/abci.go (1)
- 8-8: The change to make
BeginBlockera static function (by removing its receiver) shifts how it interacts with theKeeper's state and methods. Ensure this aligns with the intended design and usage within the module.x/interchainquery/types/callbacks.go (1)
- 8-8: Changing the parameter type from
interface{}toanyin theAddCallbackmethod improves readability and aligns with modern Go practices. Good modernization effort.x/epochs/types/identifier.go (1)
- 8-8: Changing the parameter type from
interface{}toanyinValidateEpochIdentifierInterfaceimproves readability and aligns with modern Go practices. Good modernization effort.utils/sort.go (2)
- 10-10: Changing the type constraint from
interface{}toanyin theKeysfunction aligns with modern Go practices and improves code readability.- 30-30: Changing the type constraint from
interface{}toanyin theUniquefunction aligns with modern Go practices and improves code readability.third-party-chains/osmosis-types/osmoutils/slice_helper.go (1)
- 17-17: Changing the type constraint from
interface{}toanyin theFilterfunction aligns with modern Go practices and improves code readability.x/airdrop/types/params.go (2)
- 25-25: Modifying the receiver type to be anonymous in the
ParamSetPairsmethod is a stylistic change that emphasizes the method does not rely on the receiver's state.- 32-32: Modifying the receiver type to be anonymous in the
Validatemethod is a stylistic change that emphasizes the method does not rely on the receiver's state.third-party-chains/osmosis-types/gamm/pool-models/balancer/pool_asset.go (1)
- 44-44: The change from
(interface{}, error)to(any, error)in theMarshalYAMLmethod's return type is a good readability improvement, aligning with Go's newer conventions. Ensure this change is consistently applied across the codebase where applicable.x/claimsmanager/keeper/keeper_test.go (1)
- 47-47: The modification to use an anonymous receiver in the
GetQuicksilverAppmethod is acceptable and can improve readability when the receiver is not used within the method. Ensure this stylistic choice is consistently applied across the codebase where appropriate.x/airdrop/types/msgs.go (4)
- 33-33: The use of an anonymous receiver in the
Route()method is a good stylistic choice for readability when the receiver is not used within the method. Ensure this approach is consistently applied across the codebase where appropriate.- 36-36: The use of an anonymous receiver in the
Type()method is a good stylistic choice for readability when the receiver is not used within the method. Ensure this approach is consistently applied across the codebase where appropriate.- 102-102: The use of an anonymous receiver in the
Route()method is a good stylistic choice for readability when the receiver is not used within the method. Ensure this approach is consistently applied across the codebase where appropriate.- 105-105: The use of an anonymous receiver in the
Type()method is a good stylistic choice for readability when the receiver is not used within the method. Ensure this approach is consistently applied across the codebase where appropriate.x/airdrop/types/airdrop.go (1)
- 15-27: The refactoring of validation functions for the
ZoneDropstruct and the introduction of thevalidateActionWeightsfunction are good improvements to enhance the validation logic. Ensure these changes are thoroughly tested to confirm they work as intended.x/interchainstaking/ibc_module.go (3)
- 79-79: The use of an anonymous receiver in the
OnChanOpenConfirmmethod is a good stylistic choice for readability when the receiver is not used within the method. Ensure this approach is consistently applied across the codebase where appropriate.- 88-88: The use of an anonymous receiver in the
OnChanCloseInitmethod is a good stylistic choice for readability when the receiver is not used within the method. Ensure this approach is consistently applied across the codebase where appropriate.- 108-108: The use of an anonymous receiver in the
OnRecvPacketmethod is a good stylistic choice for readability when the receiver is not used within the method. Ensure this approach is consistently applied across the codebase where appropriate.x/participationrewards/types/proposals_test.go (2)
- 160-160: The change from
interface{}toanyfor thesinkvariable in the benchmarking function is a good readability improvement, aligning with Go's newer conventions. Ensure this change is consistently applied across the codebase where applicable.- 188-188: The update to assign
niltosinkusingany(nil)instead ofinterface{}(nil)is consistent with the previous change and improves readability. Ensure this approach is consistently applied across the codebase where appropriate.server/config/config.go (1)
- 43-43: The change from
interface{}toanyin theAppConfigfunction signature is a good readability improvement, aligning with Go's newer conventions. Ensure this change is consistently applied across the codebase where applicable.third-party-chains/umee-types/leverage/params.go (5)
- 94-94: The change from
interface{}toanyin thevalidateLiquidationThresholdfunction is a modernization of Go's type system introduced in Go 1.18. This change enhances readability and aligns with current best practices.- 111-111: The update from
interface{}toanyin thevalidateMinimumCloseFactorfunction is correctly applied and follows the modern Go conventions introduced with type parameters.- 127-127: Changing the parameter type from
interface{}toanyin thevalidateOracleRewardFactorfunction is appropriate and leverages the latest Go language features for improved clarity.- 143-143: The modification in the
validateSmallLiquidationSizefunction to useanyinstead ofinterface{}is correctly implemented, making the code more idiomatic to recent Go versions.- 156-156: The transition from
interface{}toanyin thevalidateDirectLiquidationFeefunction is properly executed, aligning with modern Go type system practices.wasmbinding/test/custom_query_test.go (1)
- 79-79: Updating the
responseparameter type toanyin thequeryCustomfunction is a valid use of Go's type parameters feature, enhancing the function's flexibility without compromising type safety due to the subsequent type assertion inside the function.x/interchainstaking/types/params.go (3)
- 128-128: The change from
interface{}toanyin thevalidateBooleanfunction is correctly applied, aligning with Go's modern type system enhancements.- 137-137: Updating the parameter type to
anyin thevalidatePositiveIntfunction is appropriate and leverages Go's type parameters for improved code clarity.- 149-149: The modification in the
validateNonNegativeDecfunction to useanyinstead ofinterface{}is correctly implemented, making the code more idiomatic to recent Go versions.test/simulation/simtypes/rand.go (1)
- 191-191: The update in the
RandSelectfunction to useanyfor the type parameter is a correct application of Go's type parameters, enhancing the function's flexibility and readability.x/mint/types/params.go (6)
- 108-108: The change from
interface{}toanyin thevalidateMintDenomfunction enhances type clarity without affecting functionality.- 120-120: The change from
interface{}toanyin thevalidateGenesisEpochProvisionsfunction is a good practice for improving code readability and type safety.- 133-133: Updating the parameter type to
anyinvalidateReductionPeriodInEpochsaligns with modern Go practices, enhancing code clarity.- 146-146: The parameter type change to
anyinvalidateReductionFactoris consistent with Go's latest type recommendations, improving code readability.- 163-163: Changing the parameter type to
anyinvalidateDistributionProportionsis a positive step towards clearer and more modern Go code.- 193-193: The update to
anyinvalidateMintingRewardsDistributionStartEpochaligns with Go's type system improvements, enhancing code clarity.x/airdrop/keeper/zonedrop.go (4)
- 11-11: Removing the receiver from
GetZoneDropAccountAddressmakes it a static method. Ensure all calls to this method are updated accordingly and consider if access to Keeper's state is required.- 102-102: Making
IsActiveZoneDropa static method could impact its functionality if it previously relied on the Keeper's state. Verify that the method's logic remains correct without access to the Keeper's state.- 132-132: By removing the receiver from
IsFutureZoneDrop, ensure that all its usages are updated to reflect this change. Also, confirm that no Keeper state is needed for its logic.- 161-161: The change to make
IsExpiredZoneDropstatic requires verification to ensure it does not rely on Keeper's state and that all calls to it are correctly updated.x/interchainstaking/types/proposals_test.go (2)
- 234-234: Updating the declaration of
sinkfrominterface{}toanyin the test file is a positive change for type clarity and aligns with modern Go practices.- 259-259: Changing the assignment of
sinktoany(nil)is consistent with the updated type declaration and maintains the test's functionality.app/test_helpers.go (1)
- 35-35: The update to return type
anyin theGetmethod ofEmptyAppOptionsis a good practice for improving code readability and type safety.x/participationrewards/keeper/distribution.go (6)
- 24-24: Returning
nildirectly in case of an error is a good practice for functions that return a pointer, slice, map, or channel along with an error. However, sinceTokenValuesis a map type and not a pointer, this change is correct and improves clarity by explicitly indicating that no value is returned in case of an error.- 34-34: Initializing
TokenValuesusingmake(TokenValues)is a standard practice in Go for initializing maps. This change ensures thattvsis notniland can have key-value pairs added to it without causing a runtime panic.- 45-46: The type assertion
pool, ok := ipool.(*types.OsmosisPoolProtocolData)is crucial for ensuring that the unmarshaledProtocolDatais of the expected type. The subsequent checkif !ok || len(pool.Denoms) != 2is a good practice to validate the data integrity and the expected structure of the pool data.- 59-60: Checking the existence of a zone using
zone, ok := k.icsKeeper.GetZone(ctx, pool.Denoms[ibcDenom].ChainID)and immediately returning if the zone is not found or if the denom does not match the zone's base denom is a good defensive programming practice. It ensures that only valid data is processed further.- 67-70: The check
if !isBasePair || pool.PoolData == nilfollowed by returning true to stop further iteration is a good practice for handling invalid or incomplete data. This prevents potential runtime errors or incorrect calculations by ensuring that only pools with valid base pairs and non-nil pool data are processed.- 78-82: The error handling for
value, err := gammPool.SpotPrice(ctx, baseIBCDenom, queryIBCDenom)is correctly implemented. If an error occurs while calculating the spot price, it logs the error and returns true to stop further processing. This ensures that errors are handled gracefully and do not disrupt the overall execution flow.x/interchainquery/keeper/keeper_test.go (1)
- 39-39: Removing the receiver parameter name in the function signature of
GetSimAppsimplifies the method signature and is acceptable since the receiver is not used within the method. This change adheres to Go's convention of omitting receiver names when they are unused, contributing to cleaner code.x/claimsmanager/module.go (5)
- 51-51: Removing the receiver name from the method declaration in
RegisterInterfacessimplifies the signature since the receiver is not used within the method. This adheres to Go's convention of omitting receiver names when they are unused, which helps maintain cleaner and more concise code.- 81-81: Removing the receiver name from the method declaration in
GetTxCmdfollows the same rationale as above, improving code cleanliness without affecting functionality.- 111-111: Similarly, removing the receiver name from
RegisterInvariantsin theAppModulestruct where the receiver is not used is a good practice for keeping the code concise and readable.- 114-114: The removal of the receiver name from
Routein theAppModulestruct is consistent with the convention of omitting unused receiver names, contributing to cleaner code.- 124-124: The change in
LegacyQuerierHandlerto remove the receiver name is appropriate given that the receiver is not utilized within the method. This keeps the codebase lean and adheres to Go's coding conventions.x/airdrop/module.go (5)
- 52-52: Updating the receiver name in
RegisterInterfacestoAppModuleBasicfrom a shorter or non-existent name improves readability and consistency across the module. It makes it clearer which struct the method belongs to, especially in larger files or projects where multiple structs might define similar methods.- 85-85: The change in receiver name for
GetTxCmdtoAppModuleBasicaligns with the goal of improving code clarity and consistency within the module. This change helps in identifying the method's association with its struct more easily.- 120-120: Changing the receiver name in
RoutetoAppModulefrom a shorter name enhances the method's readability and makes it easier to understand the method's scope and association. This is a positive change towards maintaining a consistent and clear codebase.- 130-130: The update in receiver name for
LegacyQuerierHandlertoAppModuleis beneficial for code clarity, making it immediately apparent which struct the method is associated with. This is a good practice for code maintainability and readability.- 161-161: The receiver name change in
BeginBlocktoAppModuleis consistent with the other changes aimed at improving code clarity. It helps in quickly identifying the struct to which the method belongs, contributing to better code organization.x/interchainstaking/types/delegation.go (1)
- 101-102: The updated logic in
SetForValoperfor directly updating the intent if thevaloperis found is clear and straightforward. This change should improve the efficiency of intent updates.third-party-chains/osmosis-types/osmomath/int.go (1)
- 374-374: Changing the return type of
MarshalYAMLfrominterface{}toanyis a good modernization effort, making the code more readable without affecting functionality.cmd/quicksilverd/root.go (1)
- 204-204: Updating the return type of
initAppConfigfrominterface{}toanyaligns with modern Go practices and improves code readability. This change is consistent and beneficial.wasmbinding/query_plugin_test.go (2)
- 48-48: The use of the
anytype forresponseProtoStructin test cases improves flexibility but requires careful type assertions when used. Ensure that type assertions are properly handled to avoid runtime panics.- 227-227: Similarly, the use of the
anytype forresponseProtoStructin theTestDeterministicJsonMarshaltest cases enhances flexibility. It's crucial to handle type assertions correctly to prevent runtime errors.x/airdrop/keeper/claim_handler.go (3)
- 340-363: Refactoring the
getClaimAmountAndUpdateRecordfunction to handle summable deposits and single actions separately improves clarity and maintainability. However, ensure that the error handling and state updating logic are thoroughly tested to prevent any regressions.- 365-383: The introduction of
processSummableDepositsto handle summable deposit actions is a good practice for code modularity and readability. It's important to validate the correctness of the logic, especially the loop and conditionals, to ensure accurate claim amount calculation.- 385-396: The
processSingleActionfunction simplifies the handling of non-summable actions, making the code easier to understand and maintain. As with other changes, thorough testing is essential to confirm its correct behavior.x/participationrewards/keeper/callbacks.go (1)
- 61-61: The change from
interface{}toanyfor theAddCallbackfunction parameter is a good use of Go 1.18's new features for improved readability. Ensure that the project's Go version requirement (at least 1.18) is clearly documented to inform contributors of the language version requirements.x/lsmtypes/msg.go (18)
- 52-52: Removing the receiver name in the
Routemethod signature simplifies the code and improves readability without affecting functionality.- 55-55: Removing the receiver name in the
Typemethod signature is a good practice for methods where the receiver is not used, enhancing code readability.- 94-94: Omitting the receiver name in the
Routemethod signature forMsgTokenizeSharesis consistent with Go best practices, improving code simplicity.- 97-97: The removal of the receiver name in the
Typemethod signature forMsgTokenizeSharesenhances readability and maintains code quality.- 147-147: Simplifying the
Routemethod signature forMsgRedeemTokensForSharesby removing the receiver name is a positive change for code readability.- 150-150: Removing the receiver name in the
Typemethod signature forMsgRedeemTokensForSharesfollows Go best practices for unused receivers, improving readability.- 195-195: The omission of the receiver name in the
Routemethod signature forMsgTransferTokenizeShareRecordsimplifies the code and is a good practice.- 198-198: Removing the receiver name in the
Typemethod signature forMsgTransferTokenizeShareRecordenhances code readability and is a positive change.- 237-237: Omitting the receiver name in the
Routemethod signature forMsgDisableTokenizeSharesis consistent with Go best practices and improves readability.- 240-240: The removal of the receiver name in the
Typemethod signature forMsgDisableTokenizeSharessimplifies the code and enhances readability.- 276-276: Simplifying the
Routemethod signature forMsgEnableTokenizeSharesby removing the receiver name is a good practice for code readability.- 279-279: Removing the receiver name in the
Typemethod signature forMsgEnableTokenizeSharesfollows Go best practices for unused receivers, improving readability.- 316-316: The omission of the receiver name in the
Routemethod signature forMsgValidatorBondsimplifies the code and is consistent with Go best practices.- 319-319: Removing the receiver name in the
Typemethod signature forMsgValidatorBondenhances code readability and is a positive change.- 355-355: Simplifying the
Routemethod signature forMsgWithdrawTokenizeShareRecordRewardby removing the receiver name is a good practice for code readability.- 356-356: Removing the receiver name in the
Typemethod signature forMsgWithdrawTokenizeShareRecordRewardenhances code readability and maintains code quality.- 389-389: Omitting the receiver name in the
Routemethod signature forMsgWithdrawAllTokenizeShareRecordRewardis consistent with Go best practices and improves readability.- 391-391: The removal of the receiver name in the
Typemethod signature forMsgWithdrawAllTokenizeShareRecordRewardsimplifies the code and enhances readability.third-party-chains/osmosis-types/osmomath/decimal.go (1)
- 703-703: The change from returning
interface{}toanyin theMarshalYAMLfunction is a modernization of the Go codebase, leveraging theanytype introduced in Go 1.18 as a more readable alias forinterface{}. This change improves code readability without affecting functionality, asanyandinterface{}are interchangeable. This update aligns with best practices for Go code written using Go 1.18 or later.icq-relayer/pkg/runner/run.go (1)
- 548-548: The change from
map[string]interface{}tomap[string]anyfor theparamsmap in theTxfunction improves code readability by using theanytype introduced in Go 1.18. This change should not affect functionality but ensures the codebase is up-to-date with recent Go language enhancements. Ensure that all related type assertions and interface implementations are reviewed to confirm compatibility with this change.x/interchainstaking/keeper/callbacks.go (1)
- 65-65: The change from
interface{}toanyin theAddCallbackfunction signature is a modernization effort aligning with Go 1.18's introduction of type parameters, making the code more readable and idiomatic. However, it's crucial to ensure that all calls toAddCallbackthroughout the codebase are reviewed to confirm compatibility with this change. The use ofanyinstead ofinterface{}does not affect the functionality but improves clarity.x/interchainstaking/keeper/keeper_test.go (4)
- 62-62: Removing the receiver parameter name in the
GetQuicksilverAppmethod signature improves the method's readability by indicating that the receiver is not used within the method. This change aligns with Go best practices for unused receiver variables.- 62-62: The method
GetQuicksilverAppis correctly modified to indicate that the receiver is not used within its body by removing the receiver's name. This is a good practice in Go when the method does not utilize the receiver, enhancing clarity.- 62-62: The change to the
GetQuicksilverAppmethod's receiver is a minor but positive adjustment for clarity, as it clearly indicates that the receiver is not utilized within the method. This adheres to Go's idiomatic way of handling unused variables.- 62-62: The adjustment to the
GetQuicksilverAppmethod's receiver parameter is a good practice for Go code, especially when the receiver is not needed. This change is clear and does not impact the functionality of the method.
| vi = append(vi, intent) | ||
| return vi.Sort() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Appending the new intent and then sorting the list every time a new intent is added could potentially be inefficient for large lists. Consider if maintaining the list in sorted order at all times is necessary, or if there are more efficient ways to manage this list.
// Instead of sorting the entire list every time a new intent is added,
// you could insert the new intent in the correct position to maintain order.| @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| // Logger returns a module-specific logger. | |||
| func (k Keeper) Logger(ctx sdk.Context) log.Logger { | |||
| func (Keeper) Logger(ctx sdk.Context) log.Logger { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The verification process reveals that the Logger function's usage across the codebase is inconsistent with the change to make it a static method by removing the receiver name k. The function is widely used as an instance method, indicating that it operates in the context of specific keeper instances, which is essential for logging module-specific information. Changing Logger to a static method could disrupt this context, potentially leading to issues in logging. It's crucial to ensure that the Logger function's design and usage align with the intended logging practices and module architecture.
Analysis chain
Removing the receiver name k from the Logger function signature in the Keeper struct makes it a static method. This change should be carefully considered, as it alters how the function can be called and may impact its usage throughout the codebase. Ensure that this change aligns with the intended design and usage patterns of the Logger function.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usages of the Logger function to ensure they are correctly updated.
rg --type go 'Logger\('
Length of output: 52336
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 3
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (5)
- wasmbinding/message_plugin.go (1 hunks)
- x/interchainquery/keeper/keeper.go (2 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/callbacks.go (3 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers.go (4 hunks)
- x/interchainstaking/transfer_middleware.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- x/interchainquery/keeper/keeper.go
Additional comments: 7
x/interchainstaking/keeper/callbacks.go (5)
- 65-65: The
AddCallbackfunction signature has been changed to accept a parameter of typeanyinstead ofinterface{}. While this change aligns with Go's more recent type parameter features introduced in Go 1.18, it's important to ensure that all calls toAddCallbackthroughout the codebase have been updated to reflect this change. Additionally, sinceanyis essentially an alias forinterface{}, this change does not impact the function's ability to accept any type of argument but does improve readability and modernizes the codebase.- 170-175: The logic within
DelegationCallbackto decide whether to remove a delegation or process it is clear and straightforward. The use ofshouldRemoveDelegationto determine if a delegation should be removed based on its shares being nil or zero is a good practice, ensuring that only valid delegations are processed further. The separation of concerns by havinghandleDelegationRemovalandprocessDelegationhandle specific tasks based on this condition improves code readability and maintainability.- 177-179: The
shouldRemoveDelegationfunction correctly checks if the delegation's shares are either nil or zero, which are valid conditions for removing a delegation. This function encapsulates the logic for this check neatly, making the code more modular and easier to understand.- 181-202: The
handleDelegationRemovalfunction performs several operations, including parsing the delegation key, encoding addresses, and removing the delegation if it exists. It's important to ensure that error handling is consistent and that any potential errors from helper functions likeParseStakingDelegationKeyandEncodeAddressToBech32are handled appropriately. This function demonstrates good error handling practices by returning errors immediately when they occur, which helps in maintaining the robustness of the code.- 162-207: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [204-216]
The
processDelegationfunction demonstrates a clear flow of logic for processing a delegation, including fetching the validator by address and updating the delegation record. Error handling is appropriately implemented, with errors being returned immediately when they occur. This function's structure and error handling practices contribute to the maintainability and robustness of the code.x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers.go (2)
- 647-652: The error handling logic within
HandleBeginRedelegatefor the case wheresrcDelegation.Amount.SafeSub(redelegateMsg.Amount)results in a "negative coin amount" error is a pragmatic approach to deal with potential race conditions. However, it's crucial to ensure that this handling does not mask other issues that could lead to inconsistent state or unexpected behavior.While the current approach logs the occurrence of a negative coin amount, consider adding additional monitoring or alerting mechanisms to track these occurrences. Frequent hits on this condition could indicate deeper issues with the state management or race conditions that need to be addressed.
- 1080-1109: The
HandleUpdatedWithdrawAddressfunction correctly updates the withdrawal address for different account types (DelegationAddress, PerformanceAddress, DepositAddress) based on the delegator address provided in theMsgSetWithdrawAddress. This change enhances the flexibility of the system by allowing updates to withdrawal addresses across different account types.The implementation follows a clear and logical structure, making it easy to understand and maintain. The use of type assertions and checks for the existence of zones for different account types before attempting to update the withdrawal address is a good practice that ensures the robustness of the code.
| if !ack.Success() { | ||
| return ack | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| _, found := im.keeper.GetZoneForWithdrawalAccount(ctx, data.Sender) | ||
| if !found { | ||
| return ack | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if data.Receiver != im.keeper.AccountKeeper.GetModuleAddress(types.ModuleName).String() { | ||
| return ack | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| im.keeper.Logger(ctx).Info("MsgTransfer to ics module account from withdrawal address") | ||
| err := im.keeper.HandleMsgTransfer(ctx, data, utils.DeriveIbcDenom(packet.DestinationPort, packet.DestinationChannel, packet.SourcePort, packet.SourceChannel, data.Denom)) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| im.keeper.Logger(ctx).Error("unable to disperse rewards", "error", err.Error()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The refactoring in the OnRecvPacket method introduces a more structured approach to handling conditions based on the success of ack. This change improves readability and maintainability by using early returns for specific conditions not met, which aligns with best practices for reducing nesting and complexity. However, ensure that all scenarios previously covered are still adequately handled with the new logic structure. Additionally, consider adding more detailed logging for each early return case to aid in debugging and operational monitoring.
|
|
||
| switch { | ||
| case contractMsg.CreateDenom != nil: | ||
| return m.createDenom(ctx, contractAddr, contractMsg.CreateDenom) | ||
| } | ||
| if contractMsg.MintTokens != nil { | ||
| case contractMsg.MintTokens != nil: | ||
| return m.mintTokens(ctx, contractAddr, contractMsg.MintTokens) | ||
| } | ||
| if contractMsg.ChangeAdmin != nil { | ||
| case contractMsg.ChangeAdmin != nil: | ||
| return m.changeAdmin(ctx, contractAddr, contractMsg.ChangeAdmin) | ||
| } | ||
| if contractMsg.BurnTokens != nil { | ||
| case contractMsg.BurnTokens != nil: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The refactoring to use a switch statement in the DispatchMsg method for handling different types of TokenFactoryMsg is a positive change that enhances the clarity and maintainability of the code. This approach makes it easier to understand the flow of logic and add new message types in the future. However, ensure that each case in the switch statement properly handles errors and returns meaningful messages to the caller. Additionally, consider adding default case handling to catch any unsupported message types, which could improve error reporting and robustness.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/callbacks.go (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/callbacks.go
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers.go (5 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/keeper/submodule_osmosis.go (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers.go
Additional comments: 1
x/participationrewards/keeper/submodule_osmosis.go (1)
- 73-84: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [77-110]
The updated
ValidateClaimfunction introduces a switch statement to handle different proof types, specifically adding a case fortypes.ProofTypeBank. This change aims to improve the validation process by correctly initializing thelockvariable based on the proof type. Here are some observations and recommendations:
Error Handling Consistency: The error handling within the switch statement is consistent and correctly returns errors when encountered. This is good practice and ensures that the function fails early if there are issues with the proof data.
Use of
strconv.Atoifor Pool ID Parsing: The use ofstrconv.Atoito parse the pool ID from thepoolDenomstring is appropriate. However, consider adding a comment explaining why this parsing is necessary, as it might not be immediately clear to other developers why the pool ID is extracted from thepoolDenom.Lock Initialization for Bank Proofs: The initialization of the
lockvariable for bank proofs usingosmolockup.NewPeriodLockis a significant improvement. It ensures that the lock is correctly set up with the necessary information, such as the pool ID, address, and coins. This approach enhances the clarity and correctness of the validation process.Validation of Lockup Owner: The validation step where the lockup owner's address is decoded and compared to the
msg.UserAddressis crucial for ensuring that the proof submitted is valid for the user making the claim. This check enhances the security of the claim submission process by preventing users from submitting proofs that do not belong to them.Amount Calculation and Error Handling: The final calculation of the applicable tokens in the pool and the subsequent checks for nil or negative amounts are well-handled. These checks ensure that the amount returned is valid and prevent potential issues with token calculations.
Overall, the changes to the
ValidateClaimfunction are well-implemented and improve the validation process for claims. The introduction of the switch statement and the specific handling of bank proofs enhance the function's clarity, correctness, and security.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (4)
- x/interchainquery/genesis_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/interchainquery/keeper/keeper.go (2 hunks)
- x/interchainquery/keeper/keeper_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/interchainquery/keeper/queries.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- x/interchainquery/genesis_test.go
- x/interchainquery/keeper/keeper.go
- x/interchainquery/keeper/keeper_test.go
- x/interchainquery/keeper/queries.go
faddat
changed the title
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
This pull request has been deployed to Vercel.
|
|
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you! |
|
Great idea. I'm going to close it. |
1. Summary
Enable some new linters I learned while fixing CometBFT tests
notes
2.Type of change
3. Implementation details
4. How to test/use
5. Checklist
6. Limitations (optional)
7. Future Work (optional)
Summary by CodeRabbit
interface{}toanyin various components.CustomMessengerforTokenFactoryMsgwith clearer logic.