Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Core: QUnit.equiv inner refactors [Step 1] #1700

Closed
wants to merge 8 commits into from

Conversation

izelnakri
Copy link
Contributor

@izelnakri izelnakri commented Aug 16, 2022

This makes QUnit.equiv code more readable/maintainable and probably faster due to 2 changes:

  • inner private functions moved to ES Module cache instead of being registered on initial IIFE call.
  • removal of len variable allocation for array checks.

We can also utilize JS Set and remove/inline isContainer function altogether here to do faster checks, I left this out from this PR because linter gives a warning telling me compat/compat: Set is not supported in iOS Safari 7.0-7.1, IE 9:
https://github.com/qunitjs/qunit/blob/main/src/equiv.js#L63

Also JIT compiler might be able to do further optimizations based on other small changes but unlikely.

I suggest reviewing per commit ;)

src/equiv.js Outdated
@@ -103,13 +101,12 @@ const callbacks = {
},

array (a, b) {
const len = a.length;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe this was meant to account for cases where length is a (custom) getter rather than a plain property or (native) array accessor. Having said that, for custom objects we shouldn't be using this function so probably fine? Just leaving here as FYI, this is not a problem.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes I think this shouldnt be a problem due to a typeOf here: https://github.com/qunitjs/qunit/blob/main/src/equiv.js#L282

src/equiv.js Outdated
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ function innerEquiv (a, b) {
}

// ...across all consecutive argument pairs
return arguments.length === 2 || innerEquiv.apply(this, [].slice.call(arguments, 1));
return arguments.length === 2 || innerEquiv.apply(this, Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 1));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If this is in a hot path, we may want to cache it in core/utilities like toString and hasOwn, which would also avoid the lookup through various lexical scopes to global host object, and then three property chain lookups. This is not a blocker, improvement either way.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good idea implementing it now!

@Krinkle
Copy link
Member

Krinkle commented Aug 16, 2022

inner private functions moved to ES Module cache instead of being registered on initial IIFE call.

Can you elaborate what you mean by this? I understand ES Module cache as being about files executed via import statement. I'm not aware of a cache relating to local (not exported) functions declared in a JS file.

I do note as reminder that these are (currently) inlined and compiled to ES5, which may or may not affect the outcome. Perhaps you're measuring this at the distribution layer, e.g. importing the qunit.js artefact and noticing an improvement there by letting it compile these upfront instead of lazily. To my knowledge, JS engines nowadays defer compilation of declared functions until they first run, but that they have special awareness of the IIFE paradigm and eagerly compile those during the top-level file compilation e.g. not re-entering the compiler when the top-level executes the () part.

If I understand correctly, this is intended to improve startup time for the script, not runtime for diff operations, correct?

We can also utilize JS Set [but the] linter gives a warning

Ack. If the values are strings only, you can use a StringSet shim that uses native Set when available. I added a StringMap for this as well in src/globals.js. I have a 3-line StringSet implementation in MediaWiki that you're welcome to add here.

@izelnakri
Copy link
Contributor Author

izelnakri commented Aug 16, 2022

Can you elaborate what you mean by this? I understand ES Module cache as being about files executed via import statement. I'm not aware of a cache relating to local (not exported) functions declared in a JS file.

Node.js stores/caches module exports as an object to avoid extra filesystem calls. In node.js commonjs imports, this is under require.cache[$path].exports, in ES modules, node.js returns the Module object from its internal cache and that object has the exports inside the object: https://nodejs.org/api/esm.html#commonjs-namespaces . I suspect browsers do it the same way.

Here is how for example I circumvent the module cache by using a querystring on an imported file that has its contents changed, only way I could make node.js not use the cache of the import when the same file changes: https://github.com/izelnakri/qunitx/blob/main/lib/commands/run/tests-in-node.js#L20

There is probably no performance benefit compared to IIFE as the cost of calling additional function here is negligible but I think its still better to have the code/functions more flat, and always return the module object directly instead of doing the computation/mutation on an import.

Ack. If the values are strings only, you can use a StringSet shim that uses native Set when available. I added a StringMap for this as well in src/globals.js. I have a 3-line StringSet implementation in MediaWiki that you're welcome to add here.

👍 I'll add this to src/globals.js just like StringMap there in additional commit then!

@izelnakri izelnakri force-pushed the equiv-refactors branch 2 times, most recently from 757fdac to 4eef297 Compare August 16, 2022 23:29
Makes code more readable and removes variable mutations in compareConstructors().
@izelnakri izelnakri changed the title QUnit.equiv inner refactors Core: QUnit.equiv inner refactors Aug 17, 2022
@izelnakri izelnakri changed the title Core: QUnit.equiv inner refactors Core: QUnit.equiv inner refactors [Step 1] Aug 17, 2022
@@ -112,3 +112,25 @@ export const StringMap = typeof g.Map === 'function' &&
});
}
};

export const StringSet = g.Set || function (input) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When landing, I'll change this one to a typeof ternary to match g.Map. I tend to not bother adding a type checks for most polyfills (e.g. Array or String prototype methods) as I agree that presence is sufficient. If it's set to something else, that's asking for trouble!

But, global constructors in particular are prone to conflicting with unrelated values. E.g. <h2 id="Set">Set</h2> in an HTML fixture will result in g.Set coming through the window object via WindowProxy as HTMLElement reference. It's one of those legacy features on the web you are likely to run into sooner or later even if you're not (intentionally) looking for it.

https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#named-access-on-the-window-object

Krinkle pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2022
Small refactors (removals/adjustments) to make code more readable.
Makes code more readable and remove variable mutations.

* Remove IIFE closure, moving main function as direct export,
  and the rest as top-level local function.

* callbacks.object: Optimize compareConstructors().

* callbacks.object: Optimize object comparison prop call by skipping
  overhead and indirection of typeEquiv() for known array type.

* callbacks.array: Optimize isContainer() away, using a predefined Set.

* innerEquiv: Remove array allocation by re-using `slice` reference.

Closes #1700.
@Krinkle
Copy link
Member

Krinkle commented Sep 12, 2022

I kicked off a browserstack-full run in CI, and noticed that IE11 failed due to an infinite loop.

Screenshot 2022-09-12 at 01 53 37

I narrowed this down to the fact that native window.Set is available and used, but did not yet support the Set(iterable) constructor parameter. This is similar to Map where I left a comment about that. Basically, IE11 will return an empty set when given new Set(['foo'])) which means all values are seen as non-containers and thus go directly to recursion without checking pairs - hence infinite loop. One way is to use add() instead. Another is to limit use of the native version to only when it is new enough to support the iterable. I did the later in a follow-up to the draft squash branch. Will check again this week and then land if passing.

Krinkle added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2022
…rted

Avoid IE11 failure, where we otherwise fail to do proper recursion checks
against cyclical JSON.

Ref #1700 (comment)
@Krinkle Krinkle closed this in fec7c1a Sep 14, 2022
Krinkle added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2022
As part of #1700, there was an
inintended change to how we compare constructors. Instead of comparing
`obj.constructor` of the actual value, we started comparing the
constructor property as it exists on the prototype before the
constructor function runs, and thus also before any after-the-fact
mutation to an object property.

Undo that part of the change and add a regression test.

Fixes #1706.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants