esl is now providing erlang rpms.

[Kuckkuck]

esl repository is now providing erlang rpms, which work out of the box without this name fix.

Regards,

Olaf

[Kuckkuck]

Ticket: https://tickets.opscode.com/browse/COOK-3036 can be closed, when this pull request is accepted.

[jjasghar]

Is this still relevant? If so, i can merge this with another 👍

[jjasghar]

paging @zeroXten

[stevecstian]

@jjasghar
Should we still support old esl version that needs esl-erlang-compat?

[stevecstian]

@michaelklishin
We might need an update on https://www.rabbitmq.com/install-rpm.html as well ...

[jjasghar]

@stevecstian i'm betting we shouldnt support the esl-erlang-compat, i'm selfish though, i'm moving with the "newer distros" because of openstack. I'd love to hear what the community thinks and/or make it a flag to flip if needed.

[stevecstian]

👍 I'm selfish as well...

[stevecstian]

For rhel, looks like we will always include recipe yum-erlang_solutions for both esl and package install methods, which means we will Install Erlang from the Erlang Solutions repository. We don't need to install esl-erlang-compat in that case. esl-erlang-compat is needed when we download and install esl-erlang RPM from Erlang Solutions. So https://www.rabbitmq.com/install-rpm.html is still correct. My bad...
However, I am not sure about fedora ...

Could anyone double check on this?

[stevecstian]

extra indent/space here

[stevecstian]

@Kuckkuck Could you help rebase this off of master?

[cmluciano]

Should this be closed?

[cmluciano]

This seems like a potentially backwards incompatible fix, and I'm wondering if we should just go with #220. What say you @jjasghar

[jjasghar]

Merged #220