-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add ctrlf-mode-map #64
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, this is exactly the check that I was suggesting. Thanks for taking it on! Just a few small changes:
- I think we now need to rename the reference to
ctrlf--keymap
below toctrlf-mode-map
. - I think we probably want to keep the
(setcdr ctrlf-mode-map nil)
call (only in the case where yourwhen
clause passes, of course). It makes it so if you remove a binding fromctrlf-mode-map
, it actually gets deactivated. - We should update the docstring of
ctrlf-mode-bindings
to say it's deprecated, and probably mark the variable as such (I think this is done withmake-obsolete-variable
, or perhapsdefcustom
has an option specially for this). - There should be an accompanying README update, and changelog entry.
Oh yes, also the CI is currently failing (due to the reference to |
Thanks for the review. I think I addressed all your comments. |
I can make an analogous change for |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, that looks good to me. Yes, doing the same for ctrlf-minibuffer-bindings
and naming it ctrlf-minibuffer-map
sounds perfect.
31701d2
to
ee78242
Compare
@raxod502 sorry for the delay. should be ready now |
1d62310
to
354f896
Compare
Signed-off-by: Rudi Grinberg <me@rgrinberg.com>
Signed-off-by: Rudi Grinberg <me@rgrinberg.com>
Signed-off-by: Rudi Grinberg <me@rgrinberg.com>
354f896
to
ad34a04
Compare
Would you mind fixing the CI failures? This also may need a bit of additional consideration with the change ddfbc35 from February. |
This thread is being closed automatically by Tidier because it is labeled with "waiting on response" and has not seen any activity for 90 days. But don't worry—if you have any information that might advance the discussion, leave a comment and I will be happy to reopen the thread :) |
Attempt to fix #62.
I'm not sure I fully understand your
comment(my
elisp is weak), but I figure it's easier to continue the discussion
with some concrete code.