Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug with annotated with matcher #219

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 3, 2024
Merged

Conversation

koriym
Copy link
Member

@koriym koriym commented Sep 3, 2024

Moved from #218

Add red test in 5e88adb

Close #218

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced class binding and reflection functionality for improved aspect-oriented programming support.
  • Tests

    • Added a new test to validate aspect binding using annotation-based matchers, improving test coverage for AOP features.

denise-kao and others added 2 commits September 2, 2024 13:25
fix instance type error when use AnnotatedWithMatcher
See #218

This commit introduces a new test method `testAnnotateMatcher` to ensure that classes marked with the `FakeClassMarker` annotation are correctly intercepted by the aspect. The method verifies the instance creation and binding of interceptors to annotated classes.
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 3, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifying the createBind method in src/Aspect.php to use \Ray\Aop\ReflectionClass instead of the default ReflectionClass. Additionally, a new test method, testAnnotateMatcher, has been added to tests/Aspect/AspectTest.php to validate aspect binding functionality using an annotation-based matcher with a specific interceptor.

Changes

Files Change Summary
src/Aspect.php Modified createBind method to use \Ray\Aop\ReflectionClass for class reflection.
tests/Aspect/AspectTest.php Added testAnnotateMatcher method to test aspect binding with an annotation-based matcher and interceptor.

Poem

In the meadow where reflections gleam,
A rabbit hops, chasing a dream.
With aspects bound and tests in play,
Our code now dances, hip-hip-hooray!
A sprinkle of magic, a dash of delight,
Let's celebrate changes, oh what a sight! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
Early access features: disabled

We are currently testing the following features in early access:

  • Anthropic claude-3-5-sonnet for code reviews: Anthropic claims that the new Claude model has stronger code understanding and code generation capabilities than their previous models. Note: Our default code review model was also updated late last week. Please compare the quality of the reviews between the two models by toggling the early access feature.

Note:

  • You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.
  • Please join our Discord Community to provide feedback and report issues on the discussion post.

@koriym koriym merged commit e7df832 into 2.x Sep 3, 2024
48 checks passed
@koriym koriym deleted the bug-with-AnnotatedWithMatcher branch September 3, 2024 02:52
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1b2d410 and 5e88adb.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/Aspect.php (1 hunks)
  • tests/Aspect/AspectTest.php (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
tests/Aspect/AspectTest.php (1)

68-79: LGTM!

The new test method testAnnotateMatcher is correctly implemented and enhances the test coverage by ensuring that the aspect-oriented programming features related to annotations are functioning correctly.

Verify the usage of FakeClassMarker and FakeMyInterceptor in the codebase by running the following script:

Verification successful

Verification Successful: FakeClassMarker and FakeMyInterceptor are correctly implemented and used.

The FakeClassMarker is defined and used in multiple test files, and the FakeMyInterceptor is defined and used within the tests/Aspect/AspectTest.php file. The test method testAnnotateMatcher is correctly implemented and utilizes these components as expected. No issues found.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of `FakeClassMarker` and `FakeMyInterceptor` in the codebase.

# Test 1: Search for the usage of `FakeClassMarker`. Expect: At least one occurrence.
rg --type php -A 5 $'FakeClassMarker'

# Test 2: Search for the usage of `FakeMyInterceptor`. Expect: At least one occurrence.
rg --type php -A 5 $'FakeMyInterceptor'

Length of output: 3785

src/Aspect.php (1)

201-201: LGTM! The change enhances the class binding and reflection functionality.

The modification to use \Ray\Aop\ReflectionClass instead of the default ReflectionClass aligns the implementation more closely with the intended usage within the Ray AOP framework.

This change may affect how class reflection is handled and potentially alter the behavior of matchers that depend on the reflection process. It suggests an enhancement in functionality related to class binding and reflection.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants