Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Binding multiple interceptors with multiple bindings in PECL AOP #225

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 6, 2024

Conversation

koriym
Copy link
Member

@koriym koriym commented Nov 6, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Enhanced clarity and context in the README.md for using the Ray.Aop package, including improved examples and instructions for interceptors and aspect configuration.
  • Refactor

    • Improved naming consistency in the AspectPecl class by renaming parameters and methods for better clarity.
    • Enhanced control flow in the weave method to skip processing when no interceptors are bound, improving efficiency.
    • Updated handling of bound interceptors to allow accumulation rather than overwriting.

Ensure the apply method is not called with an empty list of interceptors by adding a conditional check. This prevents unnecessary execution and potential errors when no interceptors are bound.
Previously, method interceptors were overwritten if already set. This change ensures interceptors are merged instead, preserving existing ones and thus providing accumulated functionality when multiple matchers apply to the same method.
Corrected spacing inconsistencies before function calls and fixed typos in variable names from "mathcers" to "matchers". These changes enhance code readability and ensure accurate parameter usage within the weave method and related logic.
Renamed method 'apply' to 'interceptMethods' for better clarity. Updated associated comments to reflect changes accurately, emphasizing the use of the PECL Ray.Aop extension for method interception.
Revised the documentation to differentiate between weaving aspects into the source directory and a specific target directory. This change enhances clarity by providing explicit example paths for both use cases.
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 6, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request includes modifications to the README.md and the src/AspectPecl.php file. The README.md has been enhanced for clarity, particularly in the examples related to interceptors and aspect configuration. Changes include added comments and refined explanations. In AspectPecl.php, parameter names have been corrected, and the logic for handling interceptors has been improved, including renaming methods for better clarity and updating documentation to reflect these changes.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md Enhanced clarity with additional comments and context in examples, especially regarding interceptors and aspect configuration. Updated paths for weaving aspects.
src/AspectPecl.php Renamed parameter $mathcers to $matchers in weave method. Added conditional check for empty $boundInterceptors. Modified getBoundInterceptors to merge existing interceptors. Renamed apply method to interceptMethods and updated its docblock.

Possibly related PRs

  • PECL extension support and introduce newly refined main class "Aspect" #214: The changes in the AspectPecl.php file regarding the handling of interceptors and method weaving are directly related to the modifications in the README.md, which clarifies the use of interceptors in examples.
  • Update Aspect.php #218: The update to the Aspect.php file, particularly in the context of method weaving and interceptor binding, aligns with the enhancements made in the README.md to improve clarity on these topics.
  • Update Demo using Aspect class #222: The demo updates that involve the Aspect class and its methods, including binding interceptors, are relevant to the changes in the README.md that aim to clarify the usage of interceptors and aspects.
  • Organizing comments and unnecessary files, etc #224: The organizational changes and comments in this PR may indirectly relate to the overall clarity and structure improvements in the README.md, although they do not directly modify the same code elements.

🐇 In the meadow, changes bloom,
Clarity shines, dispelling gloom.
Interceptors dance, paths now clear,
With each new line, we cheer and cheer!
A hop, a skip, in code we play,
Enhancements made, hip-hip-hooray! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@koriym koriym changed the title Binding multiple interceptors with multiple bindings Binding multiple interceptors with multiple bindings in PECL AOP Nov 6, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 6, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (2.x@24f3cb8). Learn more about missing BASE report.
Report is 6 commits behind head on 2.x.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             2.x      #225   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage       ?   100.00%           
  Complexity     ?       225           
=======================================
  Files          ?        28           
  Lines          ?       583           
  Branches       ?         0           
=======================================
  Hits           ?       583           
  Misses         ?         0           
  Partials       ?         0           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
src/AspectPecl.php (2)

81-87: Good implementation of multiple interceptor binding!

The logic for handling multiple interceptors is well implemented. However, we could optimize the array merging slightly.

Consider using the spread operator for a more concise array merge:

-                $bound[$className][$methodName] = array_merge($bound[$className][$methodName], $matcher['interceptors']);
+                $bound[$className][$methodName] = [...$bound[$className][$methodName], ...$matcher['interceptors']];

95-99: Good method rename and documentation update!

The new method name 'interceptMethods' is more descriptive than 'apply'. The documentation is clear, but could be even more specific.

Consider enhancing the PHPDoc to be more specific about what the method does:

-     * Intercept methods with bounded interceptors using PECL extension
+     * Registers method interceptors for each bound method using the PECL extension.
+     * This allows intercepting method calls at runtime through the Ray.Aop extension.
README.md (3)

106-110: Consider enhancing path examples with more context.

While the added examples clarify the difference between source and target directory weaving, consider:

  1. Adding a note about path requirements (absolute vs. relative)
  2. Explaining when to use source vs. target directory weaving

Line range hint 271-271: Remove trailing characters.

The "z1" at the end of the file appears to be unintentional and should be removed.


Line range hint 1-271: Add example for multiple interceptor bindings.

Given that this PR focuses on "Binding multiple interceptors with multiple bindings", consider adding an example that demonstrates:

  1. How to bind multiple interceptors to a single method
  2. How to configure different interceptors for different methods
  3. The execution order of multiple interceptors

This would better align the documentation with the PR's objective.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 24f3cb8 and 2d5f44f.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
  • src/AspectPecl.php (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/AspectPecl.php (2)

12-12: LGTM!

The added import statement for array_merge is correctly placed and necessary for the new interceptor merging functionality.


39-51: Excellent improvements to the weave method!

The changes enhance the code in several ways:

  1. Fixed the parameter name typo ($matchers)
  2. Added optimization to skip processing when no interceptors are bound
  3. Renamed the method call to a more descriptive name (interceptMethods)
README.md (1)

82-82: LGTM! Helpful clarification comment.

The added comment clearly indicates where interceptors are applied in the execution flow.

@koriym koriym merged commit 4536d0e into ray-di:2.x Nov 6, 2024
27 checks passed
@koriym koriym deleted the refactor-bindings branch November 6, 2024 04:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant