Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: loadData not keep fresh #599

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 21, 2024
Merged

fix: loadData not keep fresh #599

merged 5 commits into from
Nov 21, 2024

Conversation

zombieJ
Copy link
Member

@zombieJ zombieJ commented Nov 21, 2024

fix ant-design/ant-design#51724

ref: #576

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • 新功能

    • 更新了 OptionList 组件的数据加载逻辑,提升了组件对外部事件的响应能力。
    • 允许外部组件控制滚动行为。
  • 测试

    • 引入了针对 TreeSelect 组件的新测试套件,验证树数据的动态加载。

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 21, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

该拉取请求对 src/OptionList.tsx 组件进行了多项修改,包括引入 syncLoadData 变量并更新 loadDataFun 的逻辑,以确保加载函数仅在适当时机被调用。此外,更新了 hasLoadDataFn 的记忆逻辑,以提高组件渲染效率。测试文件 tests/Select.loadData.spec.tsx 中新增了一个测试套件,用于验证 TreeSelect 组件的动态加载行为。

Changes

文件 变更摘要
src/OptionList.tsx 添加 syncLoadData 变量,更新 loadDataFun 逻辑,增强 hasLoadDataFn 的记忆逻辑。
tests/Select.loadData.spec.tsx 新增 TreeSelect 组件的测试套件,验证动态加载树数据的功能。

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
修复 TreeSelect 异步加载子节点数据错误 (#51724)

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐇 在树下跳跃,数据如潮,
加载新节点,欢声笑叫。
选项列表更新,功能更妙,
兔子庆祝,春天的到来,
让我们一起,享受这欢快的节拍! 🌼

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@zombieJ has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 7 minutes and 46 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b767b1 and 70361d4.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 21, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
tree-select ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 21, 2024 2:09pm

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
tests/Select.loadData.spec.tsx (3)

1-1: 建议优化 ESLint 禁用规则的范围

当前的 ESLint 禁用指令范围过大。建议仅针对特定行或代码块禁用必要的规则,以保持代码质量。

建议修改为:

-/* eslint-disable no-undef, react/no-multi-comp, no-console */
+/* eslint-disable-next-line react/no-multi-comp */

8-8: 建议优化测试用例名称

当前测试名称 "keep sync" 不够具体。建议使用更描述性的名称来反映测试的具体目的和预期行为。

建议修改为:

-  it('keep sync', async () => {
+  it('should maintain data consistency when loading nodes incrementally', async () => {

18-29: 建议增加更多测试场景

当前的 loadData 实现过于简单,没有覆盖足够的边界情况。建议添加以下测试场景:

  • 加载失败的情况
  • 叶子节点的处理
  • 异步加载超时

建议添加如下测试数据变体:

const loadData = async () => {
  const nextId = treeData.length;
  
  // 模拟随机延迟
  await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, Math.random() * 100));
  
  setTreeData([
    ...treeData,
    {
      title: `${nextId}`,
      value: nextId,
      isLeaf: nextId > 3, // 第三层后设置为叶子节点
    },
  ]);
};
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 48076ee and 6b767b1.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/OptionList.tsx (2 hunks)
  • tests/Select.loadData.spec.tsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
tests/Select.loadData.spec.tsx (1)

1-46: 验证测试用例是否充分覆盖 PR 目标

该测试用例验证了 TreeSelect 组件的数据加载同步性,这与 PR 的主要目标(修复 loadData 不保持新鲜度的问题)相关。但是,建议增加以下测试场景以更全面地验证修复:

  1. 验证第三层节点数据是否正确加载(对应 issue #51724)
  2. 验证数据在异步加载过程中的状态保持
  3. 测试快速展开/折叠节点时的数据一致性

运行以下脚本以检查是否有其他相关测试:

✅ Verification successful

测试覆盖度已经足够充分

经过验证,现有测试用例已经全面覆盖了 loadData 相关功能:

  • Select.loadData.spec.tsx 验证了数据加载的同步性和状态保持
  • Select.SearchInput.spec.js 测试了搜索场景下的数据加载行为
  • Select.props.spec.js 验证了 loadData 属性的基本功能和 treeLoadedKeys 的交互

现有测试组合已经充分覆盖了 PR 的修复目标,无需添加额外的测试场景。

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# 搜索其他可能相关的测试用例
rg -l "loadData" tests/

Length of output: 114


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# 检查其他测试文件中的 loadData 相关测试用例
rg "loadData" -B 2 -A 5 tests/Select.props.spec.js tests/Select.SearchInput.spec.js

Length of output: 4728

src/OptionList.tsx (3)

13-13: 导入语句正确添加!

引入 useEvent hook 是一个好的做法,它可以帮助保持函数引用的稳定性,避免不必要的重渲染。


245-246: 使用 useEvent 包装 loadData 是个很好的优化!

通过 useEvent 包装 loadData,可以确保:

  1. 函数引用在重渲染之间保持稳定
  2. 始终能获取到最新的 props/state
  3. 减少不必要的重渲染

这个改动直接解决了 PR 中提到的 "loadData not keep fresh" 的问题。


Line range hint 247-252: 建议验证优化逻辑的正确性

loadDataFun 的更新逻辑变得更加复杂:

  1. 使用 syncLoadData 替代了直接的 loadData 引用
  2. 依赖数组中添加了 treeExpandedKeys
  3. 比较函数的逻辑需要仔细验证

请运行以下脚本验证相关测试用例:

建议:

  1. 确保在搜索值变化时正确处理异步加载
  2. 验证 treeExpandedKeys 变化时的展开/加载行为

可以考虑添加注释说明比较函数的具体作用:

  loadDataFun = useMemo(
    () => (searchValue ? null : (syncLoadData as any)),
    [searchValue, treeExpandedKeys || expandedKeys],
+   // 仅在搜索值变化或展开键变化时更新
+   // nextExcludeSearchExpandedKeys 表示非搜索状态下的展开键
    ([preSearchValue], [nextSearchValue, nextExcludeSearchExpandedKeys]) =>
      preSearchValue !== nextSearchValue && !!(nextSearchValue || nextExcludeSearchExpandedKeys),
  );
✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the test cases and implementation to verify the optimization logic.


Based on the test implementation and source code analysis, I can now provide the final response:

优化逻辑验证完成,实现符合预期

经过验证,loadDataFun 的优化逻辑是合理的:

  1. 测试用例 Select.loadData.spec.tsx 验证了异步加载的正确性和同步性
  2. syncLoadData 的使用确保了事件处理函数的稳定性
  3. 比较函数的逻辑正确处理了搜索状态和展开状态的变化

建议保留当前实现,无需额外修改。

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# 描述:检查与 loadData 相关的测试用例

# 搜索与 loadData 相关的测试
rg -l "loadData" "tests/"

# 检查 TreeSelect 组件中的异步加载相关代码
ast-grep --pattern 'loadData'

Length of output: 768


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check loadData test implementation
cat tests/Select.loadData.spec.tsx

# Check TreeSelect implementation around loadData
rg -C 5 "loadData.*=" src/

Length of output: 3416

tests/Select.loadData.spec.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 21, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (48076ee) to head (70361d4).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #599   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           16        16           
  Lines          545       546    +1     
  Branches       151       164   +13     
=========================================
+ Hits           545       546    +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

@zombieJ zombieJ merged commit 35d98f5 into master Nov 21, 2024
11 of 12 checks passed
@zombieJ zombieJ deleted the fix-cache branch November 21, 2024 14:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

TreeSelect 异步加载子节点数据错误
1 participant