-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(worker): add dockerfile and update Rust version to 1.79 #353
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@miseyu has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 21 minutes and 49 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThis update introduces key modifications to enhance a Rust project, including the addition of a Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Application
participant Docker
participant RustCompiler
User->>Application: Start application
Application->>RustCompiler: Build with new version (1.79)
RustCompiler->>Docker: Create Docker image
Docker->>Application: Run application
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for reearth-flow canceled.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
worker/dockerfile (2)
1-1
: Specify a more stable base image tag.Using a more specific tag for the base image can prevent unexpected issues due to upstream changes.
- FROM rust:1.79-slim-bookworm as builder + FROM rust:1.79.0-slim-bookworm as builder
3-4
: Use consistent environment variable naming.Ensure consistency in naming environment variables for better readability and maintainability.
- ARG NAME=reearth-flow + ARG PROJECT_NAME=reearth-flow - WORKDIR /usr/src/${NAME} + WORKDIR /usr/src/${PROJECT_NAME}
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (7)
- worker/.dockerignore (1 hunks)
- worker/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- worker/clippy.toml (1 hunks)
- worker/crates/geometry/src/algorithm/map_coords.rs (20 hunks)
- worker/crates/geometry/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
- worker/dockerfile (1 hunks)
- worker/examples/plateau/testdata/graphs/attribute_reader.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- worker/.dockerignore
- worker/Cargo.toml
- worker/crates/geometry/src/lib.rs
Additional comments not posted (15)
worker/clippy.toml (1)
1-1
: LGTM! But verify compatibility with the updated Rust version.The MSRV update to "1.79" is straightforward and approved.
However, ensure that the rest of the project is compatible with Rust 1.79.
worker/examples/plateau/testdata/graphs/attribute_reader.yml (1)
32-32
: LGTM! But verify the new data structure usage.The change to
env.get("__value").featureTypesWithPrefix
is approved.However, ensure that the new data structure is correctly used throughout the project.
Verification successful
The new data structure usage is consistent and correct.
The instances of
featureTypesWithPrefix
in both the YAML and Rust files indicate that it is being used appropriately as an attribute key and value. No issues were found with its usage.
worker/examples/plateau/testdata/graphs/attribute_reader.yml
worker/crates/action-processor/src/plateau/dictionaries_initiator.rs
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new data structure. # Test: Search for the usage of `env.get("__value").featureTypesWithPrefix`. Expect: Consistent usage throughout the project. rg --type yaml 'env.get("__value").featureTypesWithPrefix'Length of output: 60
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new data structure across all file types. # Test: Search for the usage of `featureTypesWithPrefix` throughout the project. Expect: Consistent usage. rg 'featureTypesWithPrefix'Length of output: 261
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the relevant lines around the usage of `featureTypesWithPrefix` in the Rust file. # Extract lines around the usage of `featureTypesWithPrefix` in `dictionaries_initiator.rs`. rg 'featureTypesWithPrefix' -A 5 -B 5 worker/crates/action-processor/src/plateau/dictionaries_initiator.rsLength of output: 442
worker/crates/geometry/src/algorithm/map_coords.rs (13)
Line range hint
7-11
:
Impact of removing error handling inMapCoords
.The removal of
try_map_coords
simplifies the interface but eliminates error handling, which might reduce robustness.Ensure that the calling code is updated to handle potential errors that were previously managed by
try_map_coords
.
Line range hint
13-15
:
Impact of removing error handling inMapCoordsInPlace
.The removal of
try_map_coords_in_place
simplifies the interface but eliminates error handling, which might reduce robustness.Ensure that the calling code is updated to handle potential errors that were previously managed by
try_map_coords_in_place
.
Line range hint
17-22
:
Ensure robustness inPoint
implementation.The removal of error handling in
Point
implementations formap_coords
andmap_coords_in_place
requires careful handling in the calling code.Ensure that any potential errors are managed appropriately in the calling code.
Line range hint
24-31
:
Ensure robustness inLine
implementation.The removal of error handling in
Line
implementations formap_coords
andmap_coords_in_place
requires careful handling in the calling code.Ensure that any potential errors are managed appropriately in the calling code.
Line range hint
33-42
:
Ensure robustness inLineString
implementation.The removal of error handling in
LineString
implementations formap_coords
andmap_coords_in_place
requires careful handling in the calling code.Ensure that any potential errors are managed appropriately in the calling code.
Line range hint
44-57
:
Ensure robustness inPolygon
implementation.The removal of error handling in
Polygon
implementations formap_coords
andmap_coords_in_place
requires careful handling in the calling code.Ensure that any potential errors are managed appropriately in the calling code.
59-67
: Ensure robustness inMultiPoint
implementation.The removal of error handling in
MultiPoint
implementations formap_coords
andmap_coords_in_place
requires careful handling in the calling code.Ensure that any potential errors are managed appropriately in the calling code.
Line range hint
69-77
:
Ensure robustness inMultiLineString
implementation.The removal of error handling in
MultiLineString
implementations formap_coords
andmap_coords_in_place
requires careful handling in the calling code.Ensure that any potential errors are managed appropriately in the calling code.
Line range hint
79-87
:
Ensure robustness inMultiPolygon
implementation.The removal of error handling in
MultiPolygon
implementations formap_coords
andmap_coords_in_place
requires careful handling in the calling code.Ensure that any potential errors are managed appropriately in the calling code.
Line range hint
89-113
:
Ensure robustness inGeometry
implementation.The removal of error handling in
Geometry
implementations formap_coords
andmap_coords_in_place
requires careful handling in the calling code.Ensure that any potential errors are managed appropriately in the calling code.
Line range hint
118-125
:
Ensure robustness inGeometryCollection
implementation.The removal of error handling in
GeometryCollection
implementations formap_coords
andmap_coords_in_place
requires careful handling in the calling code.Ensure that any potential errors are managed appropriately in the calling code.
Line range hint
127-134
:
Ensure robustness inRect
implementation.The removal of error handling in
Rect
implementations formap_coords
andmap_coords_in_place
requires careful handling in the calling code.Ensure that any potential errors are managed appropriately in the calling code.
Line range hint
136-145
:
Ensure robustness inTriangle
implementation.The removal of error handling in
Triangle
implementations formap_coords
andmap_coords_in_place
requires careful handling in the calling code.Ensure that any potential errors are managed appropriately in the calling code.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Overview
What I've done
What I haven't done
How I tested
Screenshot
Which point I want you to review particularly
Memo
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
.dockerignore
file to optimize Docker build context by excluding unnecessary files.Updates
Changes
Configuration Adjustments
attribute_reader.yml
configuration file.