feat(workflow): update directory structure #520
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for reearth-flow canceled.
|
WalkthroughThe changes involve a comprehensive reorganization of the project's workflow structure, transitioning from a "worker" label to a "workflow" label across various configuration files. This includes renaming job definitions, updating file paths, and modifying caching configurations. Several files related to the previous "worker" setup have been removed, and new Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
Tip Early access (new models): enabledWe are currently testing new code review model(s) that may lead to higher noise levels in the review comments. Please disable the early access features if the noise level causes any inconvenience. Note:
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
.github/workflows/release_quality_checker.yaml (1)
Line range hint
1-138: Summary: Consistent update of working directory pathsThe changes in this file consistently update the working directory path from
./worker/tools/plateau-gis-quality-checkerto./workflow/plateau-gis-quality-checkeracross multiple steps in the workflow. This change appears to be part of a larger project restructuring effort.While the individual changes have been approved, it's important to ensure that this restructuring is consistent across the entire project.
Consider running a global check to verify that all references to the old directory structure have been updated throughout the project. This could include checking other workflow files, documentation, and any scripts that might reference these paths.
You can use the following script to search for any remaining references to the old path:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any remaining references to the old directory structure # Test: Search for references to the old directory structure if rg -i "worker/tools/plateau-gis-quality-checker" --type yaml --type markdown --type rust --type javascript; then echo "Warning: Found references to the old directory structure. Please review these occurrences." else echo "No references to the old directory structure found." fiAdditionally, ensure that the new directory structure is documented appropriately in the project's README or relevant documentation.
.github/workflows/ci.yml (2)
12-12: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The addition of the
workflowoutput aligns with the project's shift from "worker" to "workflow". This change correctly updates the CI process to track changes in workflow-related files.Consider adding a brief comment above this line to explain the purpose of this output, for example:
# Track changes in workflow-related files workflow: ${{ steps.workflow.outputs.any_changed }}
53-61: LGTM! Consider standardizing the step name format.The addition of this step to check for changes in workflow-related files is appropriate and aligns with the project's shift from "worker" to "workflow". The use of
tj-actions/changed-files@v41is a good choice for this task.For consistency with other similar steps in this file, consider updating the step name to follow the same format:
- name: changed files for workflow id: workflow uses: tj-actions/changed-files@v41 with: files: | workflow/** .github/workflows/ci.yml .github/workflows/ci_workflow.yml CHANGELOG.mdworkflow/Cargo.toml (2)
3-6: LGTM! Consider updating documentation.The workspace structure changes look good. The shift from "crates/" to "runtime/" and the inclusion of specific components as separate members reflect a more organized project structure. This aligns well with the PR objective of updating the directory structure.
Consider updating the project's documentation (e.g., README.md) to reflect this new structure and explain the rationale behind the changes. This will help onboard new contributors and maintain clarity about the project organization.
Also applies to: 9-9
Line range hint
64-165: Consider reviewing external dependency versions.While the focus of this PR was on updating the directory structure, which has been done correctly, it's worth noting that no changes were made to external dependencies.
Consider reviewing the versions of external dependencies to ensure they are up-to-date. This could potentially bring in performance improvements, bug fixes, or new features that might benefit the project. You can use tools like
cargo outdatedto identify dependencies that have newer versions available.
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (17)
workflow/Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock,!**/*.lockworkflow/README.mdis excluded by!**/*.mdworkflow/docs/images/xml_validator.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngworkflow/docs/mdbook/src/SUMMARY.mdis excluded by!**/*.mdworkflow/docs/mdbook/src/action.mdis excluded by!**/*.mdworkflow/docs/mdbook/src/edge.mdis excluded by!**/*.mdworkflow/docs/mdbook/src/get-started.mdis excluded by!**/*.mdworkflow/docs/mdbook/src/graph.mdis excluded by!**/*.mdworkflow/docs/mdbook/src/node.mdis excluded by!**/*.mdworkflow/docs/mdbook/src/workflow.mdis excluded by!**/*.mdworkflow/plateau-gis-quality-checker/README.mdis excluded by!**/*.mdworkflow/plateau-gis-quality-checker/src-tauri/icons/128x128.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngworkflow/plateau-gis-quality-checker/src-tauri/icons/128x128@2x.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngworkflow/plateau-gis-quality-checker/src-tauri/icons/32x32.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngworkflow/plateau-gis-quality-checker/src-tauri/icons/icon.icois excluded by!**/*.icoworkflow/plateau-gis-quality-checker/yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock,!**/*.lockworkflow/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/config/schema.txtis excluded by!**/*.txt
Files selected for processing (12)
- .github/labeler.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/ci.yml (4 hunks)
- .github/workflows/ci_workflow.yml (3 hunks)
- .github/workflows/release_quality_checker.yaml (2 hunks)
- worker/.gitattributes (0 hunks)
- worker/compose.yml (0 hunks)
- worker/containers/compose/otel-collector/config.yaml (0 hunks)
- workflow/.gitattributes (1 hunks)
- workflow/.taplo.toml (1 hunks)
- workflow/Cargo.toml (2 hunks)
- workflow/cli/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- workflow/runtime/examples/plateau/helper.rs (1 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (3)
- worker/.gitattributes
- worker/compose.yml
- worker/containers/compose/otel-collector/config.yaml
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- workflow/.gitattributes
- workflow/cli/Cargo.toml
Additional comments not posted (16)
.github/labeler.yml (1)
15-17: Approved change, but additional context and verification needed.The renaming from "worker" to "workflow" and the corresponding path update look good. This change aligns with the PR objective of updating the directory structure.
However, to ensure a smooth transition:
Could you provide more context about this restructuring? Understanding the rationale behind moving from a "worker" to a "workflow" concept would be helpful.
It's important to verify that this change is consistent across the entire project.
To verify the consistency of this change, please run the following script:
This script will help identify any remaining references to the old "worker" directory, ensuring that the restructuring has been applied consistently across the project.
Verification successful
Verification Successful:
All references to the old "worker" directory have been removed, and the new "workflow" directory exists as intended. The restructuring is consistent across the project.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to the old "worker" directory echo "Searching for remaining references to 'worker' directory:" rg --type yaml --type json --type js --type ts --type go 'worker/' -g '!.github/labeler.yml' echo "Searching for files still located in a 'worker' directory:" fd -t f worker/ echo "Verifying the existence of the new 'workflow' directory:" if [ -d "workflow" ]; then echo "The 'workflow' directory exists." else echo "Warning: The 'workflow' directory does not exist." fiLength of output: 606
workflow/.taplo.toml (1)
4-7: LGTM! The changes align with the PR objectives.The updated
includesection reflects the project's restructuring, focusing on the newruntimedirectory and simplifying paths. This is consistent with the PR's goal of updating the directory structure.However, I have a couple of points for consideration:
The
worker/Cargo.tomlentry seems to contradict the transition from "worker" to "workflow" mentioned in the AI summary. Could you clarify if this is intentional or if it should be renamed toworkflow/Cargo.toml?Some entries have been removed (
crates/*/Cargo.toml,examples/Cargo.toml,tests/Cargo.toml). Can you confirm that these are no longer needed in the new structure?To ensure these changes don't have unintended consequences, please run the following script:
Verification successful
Verified the restructuring of the
includesection. All old Cargo.toml files have been successfully removed.However, the
worker/Cargo.tomlentry remains. Could you confirm if this is intentional or if it should be renamed toworkflow/Cargo.tomlto maintain consistency with the project's new naming conventions?Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of new Cargo.toml files and check for any remaining old structure # Check for new Cargo.toml files echo "Checking for new Cargo.toml files:" fd -g "runtime/*/Cargo.toml" fd -g "cli/Cargo.toml" fd -g "worker/Cargo.toml" fd -g "plateau-gis-quality-checker/src-tauri/Cargo.toml" # Check if any of the old structure remains echo -e "\nChecking for remnants of old structure:" fd -g "crates/*/Cargo.toml" fd -g "examples/Cargo.toml" fd -g "tests/Cargo.toml" fd -g "tools/plateau-gis-quality-checker/src-tauri/Cargo.toml"Length of output: 456
.github/workflows/ci_workflow.yml (4)
1-1: LGTM: Workflow name updated correctlyThe workflow name has been appropriately updated from "ci-worker" to "ci-workflow", which is consistent with the overall transition and accurately reflects the purpose of this CI workflow.
33-34: LGTM: Cache settings updated correctlyThe cache settings have been appropriately updated:
- The cache workspace has been changed from "worker" to "workflow".
- The cache shared key has been updated from "worker-ci" to "workflow-ci".
These changes are crucial for ensuring proper caching behavior after the directory structure change. The new shared key will create a fresh cache, which is appropriate given the structural changes in the project.
Line range hint
1-34: Overall changes look good, but verify project-wide consistencyThe changes in this file successfully transition from "worker" to "workflow" nomenclature, which appears to be part of a larger refactoring effort. While these changes are consistent within this file, it's crucial to ensure that this transition is applied consistently across the entire project.
Please run the following script to check for any remaining instances of "worker" that might need updating:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for remaining instances of "worker" in the project echo "Searching for 'worker' in file names:" fd -t f worker echo "\nSearching for 'worker' in file contents:" rg -i worker echo "\nNote: Review these results carefully. Not all instances of 'worker' may need to be changed."Review the results carefully, as not all instances of "worker" may need to be changed (e.g., in documentation or comments explaining the transition).
20-20: LGTM: Working directory updated, but verify its existenceThe default working directory has been correctly updated from "worker" to "workflow", which is consistent with the overall transition. This ensures that all steps in the workflow will execute in the intended directory.
Please verify that the "workflow" directory exists in the repository structure. Run the following script to check:
workflow/runtime/examples/plateau/helper.rs (2)
Line range hint
1-105: Overall assessment: Changes align with PR objectivesThe modifications in this file are minimal and focused on updating the directory structure, which aligns well with the stated objectives of the pull request. The main change involves updating the path in the
create_workflowfunction, reflecting a shift in the project's directory structure.
72-76: Approve simplification and verify path consistencyThe simplification of obtaining the current directory is a good improvement. The code is now cleaner and more straightforward.
However, we need to verify the consistency of the path change from "examples/plateau/testdata/workflow" to "runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow" across the project.
Let's verify the consistency of this path change:
Please review the results to ensure this path change is consistent throughout the project.
Verification successful
Approve simplification and confirm path consistency
The simplification of obtaining the current directory enhances code clarity and maintainability.
Furthermore, the path change from
"examples/plateau/testdata/workflow"to"runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow"has been applied consistently across the project.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for occurrences of both old and new paths echo "Occurrences of the old path:" rg --type rust "examples/plateau/testdata/workflow" echo "Occurrences of the new path:" rg --type rust "runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow"Length of output: 461
.github/workflows/release_quality_checker.yaml (4)
102-103: LGTM: Working directory updated correctlyThe working directory for enabling corepack has been updated consistently with the new project structure.
106-107: Verify frontend dependencies installation in the new directoryThe working directory for installing frontend dependencies has been updated correctly to align with the new project structure.
To ensure the new path is correct and the frontend dependencies can be installed, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the ability to install frontend dependencies in the new directory # Test: Attempt to install dependencies in the new directory cd ./workflow/plateau-gis-quality-checker if yarn install --dry-run; then echo "Frontend dependencies can be installed in the new directory" else echo "Error: Unable to install frontend dependencies in the new directory" exit 1 fi
113-114: Verify Tauri project pathThe
projectPathfor the Tauri action has been updated correctly to reflect the new directory structure.To ensure the new project path is correct and contains the necessary Tauri configuration files, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of Tauri configuration files in the new project path # Test: Check if Tauri configuration files exist in the new project path cd ./workflow/plateau-gis-quality-checker if [ -f "src-tauri/tauri.conf.json" ] && [ -f "src-tauri/Cargo.toml" ]; then echo "Tauri configuration files found in the new project path" else echo "Error: Tauri configuration files not found in the new project path" exit 1 fi
28-29: Verify the new directory structureThe working directory path has been updated correctly to reflect the new project structure. This change is consistent with the overall directory restructuring.
To ensure the new path is correct and the
package.jsonfile exists, run the following script:Verification successful
Directory Structure Verified Successfully
The
package.jsonfile was found in the new directory./workflow/plateau-gis-quality-checker, confirming that the working directory path update is correct and aligns with the project restructuring.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of package.json in the new directory # Test: Check if package.json exists in the new directory if [ -f "./workflow/plateau-gis-quality-checker/package.json" ]; then echo "package.json found in the new directory" else echo "Error: package.json not found in the new directory" exit 1 fiLength of output: 237
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of package.json in the new directory # Test: Check if package.json exists in the new directory if [ -f "./workflow/plateau-gis-quality-checker/package.json" ]; then echo "package.json found in the new directory" else echo "Error: package.json not found in the new directory" exit 1 fiLength of output: 153
Tools
actionlint
29-29: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:74: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (4)
74-77: LGTM! Job successfully updated to reflect new workflow structure.The renaming of the job from
ci-workertoci-workflow, along with the updates to the conditional execution and workflow file reference, are all consistent with the project's transition from a "worker" to a "workflow" structure. These changes ensure that the CI process correctly handles the new project organization.
84-84: LGTM! CI job dependencies correctly updated.The addition of
ci-workflowto the list of dependencies for the maincijob is a necessary and correct update. This ensures that the CI pipeline maintains the proper execution order, waiting for the completion of the new workflow-related checks before proceeding.
145-145: LGTM! Minor formatting improvement.The addition of an empty line after the
build-apijob definition improves the readability of the workflow file by clearly separating job definitions. While this change doesn't affect functionality, it contributes to better code organization.
Line range hint
1-145: Overall, excellent updates to align CI with new project structure.The changes in this file consistently and comprehensively update the CI workflow to reflect the project's transition from a "worker" to a "workflow" structure. Key points:
- The
preparejob now tracks workflow-related changes.- A new step has been added to check for changes in workflow files.
- The
ci-workerjob has been renamed toci-workflowwith appropriate updates.- The main
cijob dependencies have been updated to include the new workflow job.These changes ensure that the CI process remains robust and accurate while adapting to the new project organization. The updates maintain the integrity of the CI pipeline and should help in managing the new workflow-focused approach effectively.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
workflow/Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock,!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (2)
- workflow/Cargo.toml (2 hunks)
- workflow/cli/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
workflow/cli/Dockerfile (1)
38-42: Directory structure update and build process modificationThe changes in the bind mounts and build command reflect the updated directory structure mentioned in the PR objectives. This update appears to be more focused and aligned with the new project structure.
However, please consider the following points:
Ensure that all necessary files for the build process are included in the new bind mounts. The removal of
crates,examples, andtestsmounts might affect the build if any required files were in these directories.The build command now specifically targets the
reearth-flow-clipackage. Verify that this package contains all the necessary components for thereearth-flowbinary.Consider adding comments to explain the purpose of each bind mount, especially for
plateau-gis-quality-checker, as its role might not be immediately clear to other developers.To ensure all necessary files are included in the new structure, run the following script:
workflow/Cargo.toml (2)
48-62: LGTM! Dependencies updated consistently.All workspace dependencies have been correctly updated to use the new "runtime/" path instead of "crates/". This change is consistent with the new directory structure and aligns with the PR objectives.
Regarding the past review comment about residual references to "crates/", this section has been fully updated. However, to ensure complete consistency across the project, you may want to run a search for any remaining "crates/" references in other files.
1-2: File structure maintained consistently.The overall structure of the Cargo.toml file has been well-maintained. The changes are focused on the necessary updates for the new directory structure, while preserving the existing configurations for profiles and external dependencies.
Also applies to: 7-8, 10-47, 63-185
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
workflow/Makefile.toml (2)
74-74: LGTM! Remove or update the commented-out line.The changes to the file path and the addition of the
--package reearth-flow-clioption are consistent with the previous task and the PR's objective.There's an inconsistency in the commented-out line above this task. It still references the old path
../schema/workflow.json. Consider removing or updating this line to match the new structure:-rm -rf ../schema/workflow.json +rm -rf ./schema/workflow.json cargo run --package reearth-flow-cli -- schema-workflow > ./schema/workflow.json
Action Required: Update
cargo runCommands to Include--packageFlagThe following
cargo runcommands are missing the--packageflag, which may lead to ambiguity about which package is being executed:
workflow/plateau-gis-quality-checker/src-tauri/Cargo.toml# when `tauri dev` runs it is executed with `cargo run --no-default-features` if `devPath` is an URLwebsocket/Makefile.tomlcargo runPlease update these commands to explicitly specify the package using the
--packageflag to ensure consistency and prevent potential build or runtime issues.Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-85: Verify the impact of directory structure changes across the project.The changes in this file are consistent with the PR objective of updating the directory structure. They improve clarity and specificity in the build process by updating file paths and adding explicit package specifications to
cargo runcommands.To ensure these changes are consistent across the project and don't introduce any issues, please run the following script:
This script will help identify any inconsistencies or overlooked changes related to the directory structure update.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistency of path changes and package specifications # Check for any remaining references to old paths echo "Checking for old path references:" rg -i '../schema' --type toml --type rust # Verify consistent use of --package flag in cargo run commands echo "Checking for consistent use of --package flag:" rg 'cargo run' --type toml | grep -v -- '--package' # Check for any TODO or FIXME comments related to path changes echo "Checking for TODO/FIXME comments related to path changes:" rg -i 'TODO|FIXME' --type toml --type rust | grep -i 'path'Length of output: 4491
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Investigate usages of 'cargo run' without '--package' flag and assess their contexts # List all 'cargo run' commands without '--package' flag echo "Listing all 'cargo run' commands without '--package' flag:" rg 'cargo run' --type toml --type make | grep -v -- '--package' # For each occurrence, display the surrounding lines for context echo "Displaying context for each 'cargo run' without '--package' flag:" rg -C 2 'cargo run' --type toml --type make | grep -B 2 -A 2 'cargo run' | grep -v '\-\-'Length of output: 1537
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
workflow/README.mdis excluded by!**/*.md
Files selected for processing (2)
- workflow/Makefile.toml (1 hunks)
- workflow/cli/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- workflow/cli/Cargo.toml
Overview
What I've done
What I haven't done
How I tested
Screenshot
Which point I want you to review particularly
Memo
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores
.gitattributesfile to manage language statistics effectively.Documentation
Cargo.tomlfor clarity.