feat(worker): Update example feature transformer to use l_bldg_04_05.yml instead of t_bldg_06.yml #361
Conversation
…yml instead of t_bldg_06.yml
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@miseyu has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 11 minutes and 10 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe recent changes enhance the PLATEAU system by introducing a new processor for validating building usage attributes, improving data integrity. A new module and accompanying factory facilitate this validation, while additional error handling enhances robustness. The schema is updated to reflect these changes, alongside a new YAML configuration file for quality checks. Overall, the updates streamline the processing workflow and bolster the system’s capabilities. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for reearth-flow canceled.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (10)
- schema/actions.json (1 hunks)
- worker/crates/action-processor/src/plateau.rs (1 hunks)
- worker/crates/action-processor/src/plateau/building_installation_geometry_type_extractor.rs (1 hunks)
- worker/crates/action-processor/src/plateau/building_usage_attribute_validator.rs (1 hunks)
- worker/crates/action-processor/src/plateau/errors.rs (1 hunks)
- worker/crates/action-processor/src/plateau/mapping.rs (2 hunks)
- worker/crates/types/src/attribute.rs (1 hunks)
- worker/crates/types/src/feature.rs (2 hunks)
- worker/examples/plateau/example_feature_transformer.rs (1 hunks)
- worker/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/quality-check/02-bldg/l_bldg_04_05.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- worker/crates/action-processor/src/plateau/building_installation_geometry_type_extractor.rs
Additional context used
Learnings (1)
worker/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/quality-check/02-bldg/l_bldg_04_05.yml (1)
Learnt from: miseyu PR: reearth/reearth-flow#349 File: worker/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/quality-check/02-bldg/t_bldg_02.yml:5-15 Timestamp: 2024-07-18T10:29:17.803Z Learning: For the workflow file `worker/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/quality-check/02-bldg/t_bldg_02.yml`, no configuration is required for the parameters in the "with" section.
Additional comments not posted (12)
worker/examples/plateau/example_feature_transformer.rs (1)
4-4: LGTM! Verify the existence of the new YAML file.The change to use
l_bldg_04_05.ymlinstead oft_bldg_06.ymllooks good.Ensure that the new YAML file exists and is correctly referenced.
worker/crates/action-processor/src/plateau.rs (1)
3-3: LGTM! Verify the implementation of the new module.The addition of the new module
building_usage_attribute_validatorlooks good.Ensure that the new module is correctly implemented and integrated.
Verification successful
The new module
building_usage_attribute_validatoris correctly implemented and integrated.The detailed implementation in
worker/crates/action-processor/src/plateau/building_usage_attribute_validator.rsconfirms that the module is well-defined and includes all necessary logic for its functionality.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of the new module. # Test: Search for the implementation of the new module. Expect: Module is implemented. rg --type rust -A 5 $'mod building_usage_attribute_validator'Length of output: 514
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the implementation file for the new module and inspect its contents. # Locate the file for the module `building_usage_attribute_validator`. fd building_usage_attribute_validator.rs # Display the contents of the located file. cat $(fd building_usage_attribute_validator.rs)Length of output: 11828
worker/crates/action-processor/src/plateau/mapping.rs (1)
9-9: LGTM! Verify the implementation of the new factory.The addition of the new factory
BuildingUsageAttributeValidatorFactorylooks good.Ensure that the new factory is correctly implemented and integrated.
Also applies to: 27-27
Verification successful
The implementation and integration of the
BuildingUsageAttributeValidatorFactoryare correct.The factory is well-integrated into the codebase, referenced in error handling, and added to the action mappings.
building_usage_attribute_validator.rs: Factory definition and implementation.errors.rs: Referenced for error handling.mapping.rs: Added toACTION_MAPPINGSand instantiated.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of the new factory. # Test: Search for the implementation of the new factory. Expect: Factory is implemented. rg --type rust -A 5 $'struct BuildingUsageAttributeValidatorFactory'Length of output: 759
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of the new factory. # Test: Search for usages of the new factory. Expect: Factory is used or instantiated. rg --type rust 'BuildingUsageAttributeValidatorFactory'Length of output: 2673
worker/crates/action-processor/src/plateau/errors.rs (2)
34-35: LGTM!The addition of the
BuildingUsageAttributeValidatorFactoryvariant follows the existing pattern and is consistent with other variants.
36-37: LGTM!The addition of the
BuildingUsageAttributeValidatorvariant follows the existing pattern and is consistent with other variants.worker/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/quality-check/02-bldg/l_bldg_04_05.yml (4)
1-4: LGTM!The metadata section is correctly formatted and follows the expected structure.
16-44: LGTM!The
graphssection is correctly formatted and includes all necessary references to subgraphs and actions.
45-62: LGTM!The
edgessection is correctly formatted and includes all necessary connections between nodes.
5-15: Verify the necessity of empty parameters.The
withsection includes several parameters, some of which are empty. Ensure that these parameters are correctly included and formatted, and verify if any configuration is necessary.Verification successful
Empty parameters are likely necessary placeholders.
The
withsection includes several parameters that are consistently empty across multiple files. This pattern suggests that these empty parameters are intentional placeholders meant to be filled in during actual usage.
worker/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/quality-check/02-bldg/l_bldg_04_05.ymlworker/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/quality-check/02-bldg/t_bldg_06.ymlworker/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/quality-check/02-bldg/t_bldg_02.ymlworker/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/quality-check/02-bldg/c02.ymlScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the necessity of empty parameters in the `with` section. # Test: Check if any configuration is required for the parameters in the `with` section. rg --files-with-matches $'with:\n cityGmlPath:\n cityCode:\n codelistsPath:\n schemasPath:\n schemaJson: !include ../../../config/schema.txt\n targetPackages:\n - bldg\n addNsprefixToFeatureTypes: true\n extractDmGeometryAsXmlFragment: false\n outputPath:' worker/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/quality-check/02-bldg/Length of output: 516
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the necessity of empty parameters in the `with` section. # Test: Check if any configuration is required for the parameters in the `with` section. rg --multiline --files-with-matches $'with:\n cityGmlPath:\n cityCode:\n codelistsPath:\n schemasPath:\n schemaJson: !include ../../../config/schema.txt\n targetPackages:\n - bldg\n addNsprefixToFeatureTypes: true\n extractDmGeometryAsXmlFragment: false\n outputPath:' worker/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/quality-check/02-bldg/Length of output: 645
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract and review the contents of the matched files for any documentation or comments explaining the necessity of the empty parameters. # Extract the contents of the matched files. rg --multiline --context 10 --max-columns-preview --max-columns 200 $'with:\n cityGmlPath:\n cityCode:\n codelistsPath:\n schemasPath:\n schemaJson: !include ../../../config/schema.txt\n targetPackages:\n - bldg\n addNsprefixToFeatureTypes: true\n extractDmGeometryAsXmlFragment: false\n outputPath:' worker/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/quality-check/02-bldg/Length of output: 11261
worker/crates/types/src/feature.rs (1)
267-276: LGTM! But verify the method usage in the codebase.The
all_attribute_keysmethod is correctly implemented and follows best practices.However, ensure that the method is used correctly in the codebase.
Verification successful
The
all_attribute_keysmethod is used correctly in the codebase.The method is appropriately called on a
featureobject, and the returned keys are used to verify the presence of specific keys inUSAGE_ATTRIBUTES, which aligns with the intended functionality.
worker/crates/action-processor/src/plateau/building_usage_attribute_validator.rsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `all_attribute_keys` method in the codebase. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Only valid usages of the new method. rg --type rust -A 5 $'.all_attribute_keys()'Length of output: 2787
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Review the context of the `all_attribute_keys` method usage in the codebase. # Test: Search for the method usage and include more lines for context. rg --type rust -A 10 -B 10 $'.all_attribute_keys()' worker/crates/action-processor/src/plateau/building_usage_attribute_validator.rsLength of output: 851
worker/crates/action-processor/src/plateau/building_usage_attribute_validator.rs (2)
196-196: No action needed.The
initializefunction is a placeholder and does not require any changes.
316-322: No action needed.The
finishfunction is straightforward and does not require any changes.
worker/crates/action-processor/src/plateau/building_usage_attribute_validator.rs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
worker/crates/action-processor/src/plateau/building_usage_attribute_validator.rs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
The building usage attribute validator description has been updated to provide more detailed information about its functionality and the output it produces.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
worker/crates/types/src/attribute.rs (1)
379-388: Add documentation for theall_attribute_keysfunction.The function lacks documentation, which is essential for understanding its purpose and usage.
/// Recursively collects all keys from a nested map. pub(crate) fn all_attribute_keys(items: &HashMap<String, AttributeValue>) -> Vec<String> { let mut keys = Vec::new(); for (key, value) in items { keys.push(key.clone()); if let AttributeValue::Map(map) = value { keys.extend(all_attribute_keys(map)); } } keys }
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- schema/actions.json (1 hunks)
- worker/crates/action-processor/src/plateau/building_usage_attribute_validator.rs (1 hunks)
- worker/crates/types/src/attribute.rs (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- schema/actions.json
- worker/crates/action-processor/src/plateau/building_usage_attribute_validator.rs
Additional comments not posted (1)
worker/crates/types/src/attribute.rs (1)
466-485: Unit test forall_attribute_keysis comprehensive.The unit test covers the primary use case and verifies the functionality of the
all_attribute_keysfunction.
Overview
What I've done
What I haven't done
How I tested
Screenshot
Which point I want you to review particularly
Memo
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Featurestruct and a new function for accessing all attribute keys in aHashMap.Bug Fixes