Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(engine): update workflow execution and adjust orientation condition in surface validator #641

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 18, 2024

Conversation

miseyu
Copy link
Contributor

@miseyu miseyu commented Nov 18, 2024

Overview

What I've done

What I haven't done

How I tested

Screenshot

Which point I want you to review particularly

Memo

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new quality check workflow for city GML data, enhancing validation processes.
    • Added a configuration for surface validation that adjusts feature orientation checks.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Corrected the logic for orientation checks in the surface validation workflow to ensure accurate routing based on feature orientation.

Verified

This commit was signed with the committer’s verified signature.
alexsapran Alexandros Sapranidis
…ion in surface validator
@miseyu miseyu self-assigned this Nov 18, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 18, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to several YAML configuration files and the main function of the example feature transformer. The main function's argument for the workflow file was updated to a new YAML file for quality checks. Additionally, a new quality check workflow was introduced, which includes various parameters and nodes for processing city GML data. The surface validation workflow was also adjusted to change the orientation condition from "clockwise" to "counter_clockwise."

Changes

File Change Summary
engine/runtime/examples/plateau/example_feature_transformer.rs Updated argument in main function from "data-convert/01-bldg/workflow.yml" to "quality-check/07-lsld/workflow.yml".
engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/graphs/surface_validator_2d.yml Modified FeatureFilterByOrientation condition from checking for "clockwise" to "counter_clockwise".
engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/quality-check/07-lsld/workflow.yml Introduced new workflow configuration for "QualityCheck-07-lsld" with various parameters and nodes for processing.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

engine

🐰 In the land of code where changes bloom,
A new workflow springs, dispelling the gloom.
From clockwise to counter, the filters now flow,
Quality checks ready, with data to show.
With paths well defined and nodes in a row,
Let’s hop into action, let the features glow! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 18, 2024

Deploy Preview for reearth-flow canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 6da1d07
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/reearth-flow/deploys/673adb197ef1550008872afd

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/quality-check/07-lsld/workflow.yml (2)

42-75: Consider optimizing attribute aggregation

The attribute aggregation could be simplified by using a single calculation block for all metrics.

Consider consolidating the calculations:

  aggregateAttributes:
    - newAttribute: Index
      attributeValue: |
        env.get("__value").fileIndex.to_string()
    - newAttribute: Folder
-     attribute: package
+     attributeValue: |
+       env.get("__value").package
    - newAttribute: Filename
      attributeValue: |
        file::extract_filename(env.get("__value").cityGmlPath)
    - newAttribute: "フィーチャータイプ"
-     attribute: featureType
+     attributeValue: |
+       env.get("__value").featureType

76-191: Review error handling in surface validation

The surface validation workflow appropriately handles two types of errors:

  1. Invalid surface orientation
  2. Invalid surface geometry

However, there's potential for improvement in error reporting.

Consider adding:

  1. Error severity levels
  2. Detailed error descriptions
  3. Suggestions for fixing common issues
engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/graphs/surface_validator_2d.yml (1)

Line range hint 1-447: LGTM: Well-structured workflow configuration

The overall workflow configuration is well-structured with clear separation of concerns:

  • Surface validation steps are logically organized
  • Error handling paths are properly defined
  • Node connections maintain a clear flow of data

Consider adding documentation comments for each major section of the workflow to improve maintainability. For example:

# Surface Orientation Validation
# Validates the orientation of surface boundaries according to CityGML/PLATEAU specifications
- id: 27cd7ebf-7d16-4a1c-ac27-02eddb61a7b9
  name: FeatureFilterByOrientation
  ...
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0d2f9f0 and 6da1d07.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • engine/runtime/examples/plateau/example_feature_transformer.rs (1 hunks)
  • engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/graphs/surface_validator_2d.yml (1 hunks)
  • engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/quality-check/07-lsld/workflow.yml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • engine/runtime/examples/plateau/example_feature_transformer.rs
🔇 Additional comments (4)
engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/quality-check/07-lsld/workflow.yml (3)

23-41: LGTM: Input processing setup is well structured

The input processing chain (FolderAndfilePathReader → FeatureReader → LodSplitterWithDm) is properly configured to handle CityGML data.


193-320: Verify edge connections in result processing

The result processing section uses FeatureMerger to combine multiple data streams. Ensure all edge connections are properly defined.

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify edge connections for result processing
# Expected: All referenced node IDs exist and are properly connected

# Extract and verify node IDs
rg -o 'id: ([a-f0-9-]+)' . | sort | uniq -d

# Check for dangling edges
rg 'from: ([a-f0-9-]+)' . | cut -d: -f2 | sort > /tmp/from_nodes
rg 'id: ([a-f0-9-]+)' . | cut -d: -f2 | sort > /tmp/all_nodes
comm -23 /tmp/from_nodes /tmp/all_nodes

16-19: Verify surface validator changes

The workflow includes a surface validator component that may have been modified to handle counter-clockwise orientation as mentioned in the PR summary.

✅ Verification successful

Surface validator is correctly configured for counter-clockwise orientation

The surface validator configuration explicitly checks for counter-clockwise orientation in the FeatureFilterByOrientation node:

conditions:
  - expr: |
      env.get("__value").outerOrientation != "counter_clockwise"
    outputPort: inCorrectOrientation

This validates that surfaces must have counter-clockwise orientation, which aligns with the PR's changes. Features with incorrect orientation are routed to the inCorrectOrientation port for handling.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for recent changes to surface validator configuration
# Expected: Changes related to orientation validation from clockwise to counter-clockwise

# Check surface validator changes
rg -p "orientation|clockwise|counter" ../../../graphs/surface_validator_2d.yml

Length of output: 1258


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the surface validator configuration
# First, let's locate the exact file
fd "surface_validator_2d.yml" --type f

# Then let's examine its contents
cat $(fd "surface_validator_2d.yml" --type f) 

Length of output: 13671

engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/graphs/surface_validator_2d.yml (1)

43-43: Verify alignment with CityGML/PLATEAU specifications

The orientation condition has been changed from "clockwise" to "counter_clockwise". While the change is technically sound, we should verify that this aligns with the CityGML/PLATEAU specifications for surface orientation.

Let's check the repository for any documentation or specifications about surface orientation:

@miseyu miseyu merged commit 6fbf061 into main Nov 18, 2024
17 checks passed
@miseyu miseyu deleted the feature/add-quality-check-07-lsld branch November 18, 2024 06:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant