chore(engine): add ExampleTranXLinkChecker workflow configuration #662
Conversation
WalkthroughA new YAML configuration file, Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
✅ Deploy Preview for reearth-flow canceled.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/example_tran_xlink_checker.yml (1)
35-45: LGTM! Clear and logical workflow connections.The edges properly connect the nodes in a sequential flow:
- FolderAndfilePathReader → TranXLinkChecker
- TranXLinkChecker → Echo
Consider adding error handling edges to manage potential failures in the TranXLinkChecker process.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/example_tran_xlink_checker.yml(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/example_tran_xlink_checker.yml (5)
1-4: LGTM! Well-structured workflow configuration header.
The configuration follows best practices with schema validation and proper identification.
11-14: LGTM! Well-defined package targeting configuration.
The target package configuration and feature type handling flags are clearly specified.
19-34: LGTM! Well-structured node definitions.
The workflow nodes are logically organized with clear type definitions and actions.
15-16: Verify the included graph file existence and structure.
The workflow depends on an external graph file that needs verification.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the path more thoroughly by searching for the file name in the repository.
Let me check the content of the found file to verify its structure.
The referenced graph file exists and has valid structure
The included graph file folder_and_file_path_reader.yml exists at the correct relative path (../graphs/) from the workflow file. It contains a well-structured graph with:
- Valid graph ID and name
- 6 properly connected nodes for file path processing
- Complete edge definitions connecting all nodes
- Proper action definitions with required parameters
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the referenced graph file exists
if [ -f "engine/runtime/examples/plateau/graphs/folder_and_file_path_reader.yml" ]; then
echo "Graph file exists"
# Check the structure of the included graph
rg -A 5 "id: c6863b71-953b-4d15-af56-396fc93fc617" engine/runtime/examples/plateau/graphs/
else
echo "Warning: Referenced graph file not found"
fi
Length of output: 174
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the yml file in the repository
fd "folder_and_file_path_reader.yml"
# Search for any references to this file in the codebase
rg "folder_and_file_path_reader.yml"
Length of output: 3539
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the found graph file
cat "engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/graphs/folder_and_file_path_reader.yml"
Length of output: 2394
5-10:
Verify required path parameters and schema inclusion.
Several critical path parameters (cityGmlPath, cityCode, codelistsPath, schemasPath) are undefined. Additionally, the schema inclusion needs verification.
Consider providing default values or validation for required parameters to prevent runtime failures.
Overview
What I've done
What I haven't done
How I tested
Screenshot
Which point I want you to review particularly
Memo
Summary by CodeRabbit