feat(engine): update example workflow path and enhance error messages… #676
Conversation
… in metadata handling
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant modifications across several components, primarily enhancing the sorting functionality in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
✅ Deploy Preview for reearth-flow canceled.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
engine/runtime/action-processor/src/feature/sorter.rs (2)
Line range hint
52-70: Enhanced error handling for missingwithparameterThe current implementation returns an error when the
withparameter isNone. Consider providing a more informative error message to aid in debugging, or consider setting default parameters to improve usability.
71-96: Simplify the compilation and validation logic ofsort_byparametersThe nested
ifandmatchstatements within the loop processingsort_byparameters could be refactored for improved readability and maintainability. Consider using pattern matching to handle the combination ofattributeandattribute_valueoptions more succinctly.Apply the following diff to streamline the logic:
for sort in ¶ms.sort_by { let attribute_value = match &sort.attribute_value { Some(expr) => { Some( expr_engine .compile(expr.as_ref()) .map_err(|e| FeatureProcessorError::FilterFactory(format!("{:?}", e)))?, ) } None => None, }; if sort.attribute.is_none() && attribute_value.is_none() { return Err( FeatureProcessorError::FilterFactory( "Either `attribute` or `attributeValue` is required".to_string(), ) .into(), ); } sort_by.push(CompiledSortBy { attribute: sort.attribute.clone(), attribute_value, order: sort.order.clone(), }); }This refactor reduces nesting and makes the validation of required parameters clearer.
engine/runtime/types/src/feature.rs (1)
138-141: HandleNonefeature types explicitlyIn the implementation of
From<&Feature> for Schema, iffeature_typeisNone, the method returns an empty schema. Consider logging a warning or implementing a fallback to ensure that features without a type are appropriately handled.engine/runtime/action-sink/src/file/cesium3dtiles/sink.rs (2)
160-164: Improve error handling whenfeature_typeis missingThe current implementation returns an error if
feature_typeis not found. Consider providing a more detailed error message or handling cases wherefeature_typemight legitimately beNone, depending on the application's requirements.
191-197: Optimize feature aggregation in thefinishmethodThe aggregation of features in the
finishmethod may be inefficient if the dataset is large. Consider streaming the features directly to thewritemethod or processing them in chunks to reduce memory usage.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
engine/docs/mdbook/src/action.mdis excluded by!**/*.md
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
engine/runtime/action-processor/src/feature/sorter.rs(7 hunks)engine/runtime/action-sink/src/file/cesium3dtiles/sink.rs(4 hunks)engine/runtime/examples/plateau/example_feature_transformer.rs(1 hunks)engine/runtime/gltf/src/metadata.rs(1 hunks)engine/runtime/types/src/feature.rs(3 hunks)engine/schema/actions.json(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- engine/runtime/examples/plateau/example_feature_transformer.rs
🔇 Additional comments (9)
engine/runtime/action-processor/src/feature/sorter.rs (1)
47-51: Proper utilization of ctx parameter in build method
The change from _ctx to ctx in the build method indicates that NodeContext is now being used. Ensure that ctx is appropriately utilized within the method to avoid any unused variable warnings and to leverage any necessary context for building the processor.
engine/runtime/types/src/feature.rs (2)
Line range hint 143-156: Simplification of TypeDef construction
The simplified implementation of From<&Feature> for TypeDef directly constructs a FeatureTypeDef with additional_attributes set to true. Ensure this aligns with the overall schema design and that all necessary attributes are included.
356-363: Verify the addition of __feature_type and __feature_id to the scope
The new_scope method now includes __feature_type and __feature_id in the scope variables. Confirm that these additions do not conflict with existing variables and are correctly utilized in expression evaluations throughout the codebase.
Run the following script to check for any conflicts with scope variables:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about the scope variables and their usage.
Let me check one more thing to understand the evaluation context better.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
✓ The addition of __feature_type and __feature_id scope variables is safe
The codebase analysis shows that these new scope variables are introduced in a controlled context where:
- They coexist with other similar scope variables (
__value,__features) - There are no conflicting usages of these variable names
- The variables follow the established pattern of using double underscore prefix for scope variables
- They are used only within the feature evaluation context
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for usage of `__feature_type` and `__feature_id` in expressions.
# Find all instances where these variables are used
rg '__feature_type|__feature_id' -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 681
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all scope variable assignments to understand the complete scope context
ast-grep --pattern 'scope.set($name, $value)'
# Also search for any direct string references to these variables in expressions
rg -g '*.rs' '"__[a-z_]*"' -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 1358
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for the scope evaluation context and expression patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'scope.eval($expr)'
# Also check for any potential variable name conflicts in the test files
rg -g '*test*.rs' '__feature_type|__feature_id|__value|__features'
Length of output: 109
engine/runtime/action-sink/src/file/cesium3dtiles/sink.rs (3)
134-134: Update buffer to include feature_type in the key
Changing the buffer's key to (Uri, String) to include feature_type allows features to be grouped by both output and type. Ensure all places where the buffer is accessed are updated accordingly and that this change does not introduce any unintended grouping issues.
209-223: Adjust write method to handle new feature grouping
The write method now accepts a Vec<(String, Vec<Feature>)> to handle features grouped by feature_type. Ensure that this change is propagated correctly and that all calls to write are updated. Verify that the method processes each group appropriately.
183-186: Avoid potential key collisions in the buffer
When using (output, feature_type) as the key in the buffer, ensure that there are no unintended key collisions, especially if feature_type values are not unique across different outputs. Consider using more robust key structures or hashing if necessary.
Check for possible duplicate keys with the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about the buffer usage and feature types.
Let me check the buffer type definitions and how these keys are used in both sinks.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Buffer key structure is safe from collisions
The buffer implementation in Cesium3DTilesWriter uses a tuple of (Uri, String) as the key, where the second component is the feature type. This is a safe design because:
- The key combines both the output URI and feature type, ensuring uniqueness per output file
- Each feature's type is scoped to its specific output destination
- The MVT sink uses a similar pattern with
(output, layer_name)keys - Both implementations properly scope their buffers to prevent cross-contamination between different outputs
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that buffer keys are unique across the application.
# List all unique keys used in the buffer
rg 'buffer\.entry\(\(' -A 1
# Check for potential duplicates
# (Assuming keys are logged or can be serialized for comparison)
Length of output: 246
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the struct definitions and implementations for both sinks
rg -A 10 "struct.*Sink" engine/runtime/action-sink/src/file/cesium3dtiles/sink.rs
rg -A 10 "struct.*Sink" engine/runtime/action-sink/src/file/mvt/sink.rs
# Look for feature_type and layer_name definitions/usages
rg "feature_type|layer_name" engine/runtime/action-sink/src/file/
Length of output: 3904
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check buffer type definitions and their usage
rg -B 3 -A 3 "buffer:.*HashMap" engine/runtime/action-sink/src/file/
rg -B 3 -A 3 "buffer.*=.*HashMap::new" engine/runtime/action-sink/src/file/
# Check the Feature type definition and its feature_type implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'impl $$ for Feature {
$$$
feature_type($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 4349
engine/runtime/gltf/src/metadata.rs (1)
51-54: Enhanced error message in add_feature method
Including the typename in the error message when a feature type is not found improves debugging and traceability. This change enhances the clarity of error reporting.
engine/schema/actions.json (2)
1086-1088: Define Expr type for expression support
The addition of the Expr definition allows for expressions to be used within parameters. Ensure that this definition is correctly referenced in all relevant parts of the schema and that it aligns with the expressions used in the application logic.
1103-1120: Update SortBy to support attribute or attributeValue
Allowing attribute to be null and adding attributeValue provides flexibility in sorting features. Verify that the application correctly handles cases where either attribute or attributeValue (or both) are provided. Ensure that validation logic enforces that at least one is specified.
… in metadata handling
Overview
What I've done
What I haven't done
How I tested
Screenshot
Which point I want you to review particularly
Memo
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
These changes collectively improve the user experience by enhancing functionality, flexibility, and error handling across the platform.