Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(engine): update folder and file path reader names and add new data conversion workflow #631

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 14, 2024

Conversation

miseyu
Copy link
Contributor

@miseyu miseyu commented Nov 14, 2024

Overview

What I've done

What I haven't done

How I tested

Screenshot

Which point I want you to review particularly

Memo

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced two new workflows for data conversion, enhancing processing capabilities.
    • Updated parameters in existing workflows for improved configuration clarity.
  • Improvements

    • Standardized naming conventions for nodes to enhance consistency and clarity.
    • Simplified the data mapping process in the AttributeMapperLuse node for better usability.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Preserved connections and flow between nodes to ensure data integrity across workflows.

@miseyu miseyu self-assigned this Nov 14, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 14, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to several YAML configuration files related to data workflows and node definitions. Key updates include the renaming of nodes for improved clarity and consistency, along with the introduction of a new workflow YAML file. Existing workflows have been adjusted to reflect new parameters and structural changes, particularly in the AttributeMapperLuse node, which has undergone simplification. The overall structure and relationships between nodes have been preserved.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/graphs/folder_and_file_path_reader.yml Node names updated: FilePathExtractor01FilePathExtractor, FeatureFilter01FeatureFilter, PLATEAU.UDXFolderExtractor-01PLATEAU.UDXFolderExtractor, FeatureFilter02FeatureFilterByPackage, FeatureCounter01FeatureCounterByUdxDirs.
engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/data-convert/04-luse-lsld/workflow.yml Workflow name updated to "DataConvert-05-luse-urf-workflow"; adjustments to parameters and removal of multiple expression block in AttributeMapperLuse.
engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/data-convert/05-fld/workflow.yml New workflow defined: "DataConvert-05-fld" with ID b6632c8d-49bc-4569-9d59-f1532405da44, entry graph ID 45580b09-63a4-471a-92eb-1241660bddfb, and various input parameters specified.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

engine

🐇 In the land of YAML, where nodes do play,
Names were changed, in a clearer way.
From FilePathExtractor01 to a name so neat,
Each node now dances to a standardized beat.
With workflows crafted, and edges intact,
Data flows smoothly, that's a fact! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 14, 2024

Deploy Preview for reearth-flow ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 95c865b
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/reearth-flow/deploys/673559ebf5fdf00008441576
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-631--reearth-flow.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/graphs/folder_and_file_path_reader.yml (1)

Line range hint 1-83: Well-structured naming improvements

The renaming changes follow a consistent pattern that:

  1. Removes arbitrary numbered suffixes (01, 02)
  2. Adds descriptive suffixes based on node functionality
  3. Maintains the workflow structure while improving readability

This makes the configuration more maintainable and self-documenting.

engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/data-convert/05-fld/workflow.yml (2)

1-18: Add parameter documentation and validation

The workflow configuration would benefit from:

  1. Documentation comments explaining each parameter's purpose and expected values
  2. Default values or validation rules for critical parameters like cityGmlPath and outputPath

Add documentation comments like this:

 with:
+  # Path to the CityGML input file
   cityGmlPath:
+  # City code identifier
   cityCode:
+  # Path to codelists directory
   codelistsPath:

168-218: Add workflow diagram documentation

The edge definitions create a complex processing graph. Consider:

  1. Adding a visual workflow diagram (e.g., using Mermaid or PlantUML)
  2. Documenting the purpose of each processing stage

Example documentation using Mermaid:

graph TD
    A[AttributeReader] --> B[AttributeMapperFilePath]
    B --> C[FileWriterTsv]
    A --> D[FeatureTransformer]
    D --> E[FeatureReader]
    E --> F[LodSplitter]
    F -->|lod1| G[AttributeMapperLod0-2]
    G --> H[MvtWriter]
    F -->|lod3| I[AttributeMapperLod3]
    I --> J[VerticalReprojector]
    J --> K[3DTilesWriter]
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d5e292e and 95c865b.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/graphs/folder_and_file_path_reader.yml (4 hunks)
  • engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/data-convert/04-luse-lsld/workflow.yml (0 hunks)
  • engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/data-convert/05-fld/workflow.yml (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/data-convert/04-luse-lsld/workflow.yml
🔇 Additional comments (6)
engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/graphs/folder_and_file_path_reader.yml (5)

Line range hint 5-11: LGTM: Improved node naming

The removal of the "01" suffix from FilePathExtractor makes the name clearer while maintaining the node's functionality.


Line range hint 14-21: LGTM: Clear and specific filter node

The simplified name FeatureFilter better represents its purpose of filtering GML files.


24-29: LGTM: Consistent naming for PLATEAU extractor

The removal of the "-01" suffix maintains naming consistency while preserving the domain-specific prefix "PLATEAU".


Line range hint 32-39: LGTM: More descriptive filter name

The rename from FeatureFilter02 to FeatureFilterByPackage better describes its specific purpose of filtering by package name. The null coalescing operator provides good protection against undefined targetPackages.


Line range hint 42-48: LGTM: Descriptive counter node name

The rename from FeatureCounter01 to FeatureCounterByUdxDirs clearly indicates its purpose of counting features grouped by UDX directories.

engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/data-convert/05-fld/workflow.yml (1)

121-167: Clarify zoom level strategy for MVT and 3DTiles

The MVT writer (zoom 8-16) and 3DTiles writer (zoom 15-18) have overlapping zoom levels (15-16). This might lead to:

  1. Duplicate data generation
  2. Potential inconsistencies in visualization

Please verify if this overlap is intentional and document the rationale.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant