-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(engine): implement action factories and main workflow logic #522
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve updates to the action data retrieval process, the introduction of new feature flags and dependencies, and the implementation of both synchronous and asynchronous main functions in the worker engine. The modifications enhance the organization of action factories and streamline the workflow execution process while maintaining existing functionality. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
✅ Deploy Preview for reearth-flow canceled.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 5
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
engine/worker/Cargo.toml (1)
17-19
: New feature flags addedThe addition of the
[features]
section withdefault
andfeature-async
flags is a good practice for future extensibility. This allows for conditional compilation, which can be useful for enabling or disabling certain features or optimizations in the future.However, both feature flags are currently empty. It would be helpful to add comments explaining the intended use of these flags, especially
feature-async
, to provide context for other developers.Consider adding comments to explain the purpose of these feature flags, especially
feature-async
. For example:[features] # Default features default = [] # Enables async functionality (TODO: Implement async features) feature-async = []engine/worker/src/factory.rs (2)
10-19
: LGTM: Well-implemented lazy initialization of built-in action factories.The use of
Lazy
for initialization is good for performance. The code effectively combines mappings from different sources into a singleHashMap
.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this static variable for improved code documentation:
/// Combines action factory mappings from sink, source, and processor modules. pub(crate) static BUILTIN_ACTION_FACTORIES: Lazy<HashMap<String, NodeKind>> = Lazy::new(|| { // ... (existing code) });
21-22
: LGTM: Consistent implementation of PLATEAU action factories.The implementation is concise and follows the same pattern as
BUILTIN_ACTION_FACTORIES
.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this static variable:
/// Provides action factory mappings specific to PLATEAU processing. pub(crate) static PLATEAU_ACTION_FACTORIES: Lazy<HashMap<String, NodeKind>> = Lazy::new(|| PLATEAU_MAPPINGS.clone());engine/worker/src/main.rs (3)
24-26
: Implement input handling foryaml
,job_id
, andaction_log_uri
Currently, the variables
yaml
,job_id
, andaction_log_uri
are hardcoded with placeholder values and TODO comments (lines 24-26). To make the application functional, you need to implement logic to read these values from appropriate sources, such as command-line arguments, environment variables, or configuration files.Would you like assistance in implementing the input handling logic or opening a GitHub issue to track this task?
67-69
: Implement input handling foryaml
,job_id
, andaction_log_uri
Currently, the variables
yaml
,job_id
, andaction_log_uri
are hardcoded with placeholder values and TODO comments (lines 67-69). To make the application functional, you need to implement logic to read these values from appropriate sources, such as command-line arguments, environment variables, or configuration files.Would you like assistance in implementing the input handling logic or opening a GitHub issue to track this task?
15-18
: Complete the incomplete commentThe comment on lines 17-18 seems incomplete:
Once you've decided which to use,
The sentence is unfinished. Please complete the comment for clarity.
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
engine/Cargo.lock
is excluded by!**/*.lock
,!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (4)
- api/internal/app/actions.go (1 hunks)
- engine/worker/Cargo.toml (2 hunks)
- engine/worker/src/factory.rs (1 hunks)
- engine/worker/src/main.rs (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
engine/worker/Cargo.toml (1)
35-36
: New dependencies addedThe addition of
once_cell
anduuid
as workspace dependencies is appropriate. These are commonly used libraries that can be beneficial for the project:
once_cell
is useful for lazy initialization of global variables or singletons.uuid
is valuable for generating unique identifiers, which can be crucial in distributed systems.Using
.workspace = true
ensures consistent versioning across the project, which is a good practice.To ensure these new dependencies are properly integrated and used in the project, let's verify their usage:
Verification successful
Dependency Integration Verified Successfully
The
once_cell
anduuid
dependencies have been properly integrated and are actively used across multiple modules in the project. This confirms that their addition as workspace dependencies is appropriate and beneficial for the project's functionality.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of new dependencies in the project # Check for imports of once_cell echo "Checking usage of once_cell:" rg --type rust "use once_cell" ./src # Check for imports of uuid echo "Checking usage of uuid:" rg --type rust "use uuid" ./src # If no results are found, it might indicate that these dependencies are not yet used in the code.Length of output: 288
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate Rust source files and verify the usage of once_cell and uuid dependencies # Find all Rust source files echo "Locating Rust source files:" fd --type file --extension rs # After locating the files, search for imports of once_cell echo "Checking usage of once_cell:" fd --type file --extension rs | xargs rg "use once_cell" # Check for imports of uuid echo "Checking usage of uuid:" fd --type file --extension rs | xargs rg "use uuid"Length of output: 22028
engine/worker/src/factory.rs (1)
1-8
: LGTM: Imports are well-organized and appropriate.The imports are concise and relevant to the functionality being implemented. The use of aliases for
ACTION_FACTORY_MAPPINGS
from different modules improves readability.api/internal/app/actions.go (1)
90-90
: Approve change, but consider improvementsThe URL update reflects a project structure change, moving
actions.json
into theengine
subdirectory. While this change is valid, there are a few points to consider:
- The hardcoded nature of the URL, as mentioned in the comment, is not ideal for maintainability and flexibility.
- We should verify that the file exists at the new location to prevent potential runtime errors.
To verify the file's existence and suggest improvements, consider the following:
Consider implementing a more configurable approach:
- Use an environment variable:
os.Getenv("ACTIONS_JSON_URL")
- Use a configuration file with a library like Viper:
viper.GetString("actions_json_url")
This would allow for easier updates and environment-specific configurations.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- engine/cli/src/factory.rs (1 hunks)
- engine/worker/src/factory.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- engine/worker/src/factory.rs
Additional comments not posted (1)
engine/cli/src/factory.rs (1)
Line range hint
1-27
: Overall excellent refactoring of action factory initializationsThe changes in this file demonstrate a consistent approach to refactoring, utilizing functional programming concepts and iterator chaining. These modifications have improved code readability, reduced mutable state, and enhanced maintainability without altering the core functionality.
The suggested minor optimizations, if implemented, could further improve the code by reducing unnecessary cloning operations.
Great job on this refactoring effort!
Overview
What I've done
What I haven't done
How I tested
Screenshot
Which point I want you to review particularly
Memo
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores