Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(engine): implement action factories and main workflow logic #522

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 23, 2024

Conversation

miseyu
Copy link
Contributor

@miseyu miseyu commented Sep 23, 2024

Overview

What I've done

What I haven't done

How I tested

Screenshot

Which point I want you to review particularly

Memo

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated data source for actions data retrieval.
    • Introduced new feature flags and dependencies for future enhancements.
    • Added support for both synchronous and asynchronous execution of workflows.
  • Bug Fixes

    • None reported in this release.
  • Documentation

    • Placeholder comments added for future implementation and error management in the main function.
  • Chores

    • Updated configuration files to include new dependencies.

@miseyu miseyu requested review from pyshx and a team as code owners September 23, 2024 05:52
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 23, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve updates to the action data retrieval process, the introduction of new feature flags and dependencies, and the implementation of both synchronous and asynchronous main functions in the worker engine. The modifications enhance the organization of action factories and streamline the workflow execution process while maintaining existing functionality.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
api/internal/app/actions.go Updated URL in loadActionsData function to retrieve action data from a new JSON schema location.
engine/worker/Cargo.toml Added a new [features] section with default and feature-async, and included new dependencies once_cell, tokio, and uuid.
engine/worker/src/factory.rs Introduced static variables for action factories using once_cell, combining mappings from various action categories.
engine/worker/src/main.rs Implemented two versions of the main function for synchronous and asynchronous execution, including workflow setup.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

workflow

Poem

In the meadow where actions bloom,
A new path leads away from gloom.
With factories built and features bright,
Our workflow hops with pure delight.
Synchronous, async, both take flight,
A rabbit's cheer for code so right! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Sep 23, 2024

Deploy Preview for reearth-flow canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit b84f1c8
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/reearth-flow/deploys/66f1055e0b2bfb0008c63937

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
engine/worker/Cargo.toml (1)

17-19: New feature flags added

The addition of the [features] section with default and feature-async flags is a good practice for future extensibility. This allows for conditional compilation, which can be useful for enabling or disabling certain features or optimizations in the future.

However, both feature flags are currently empty. It would be helpful to add comments explaining the intended use of these flags, especially feature-async, to provide context for other developers.

Consider adding comments to explain the purpose of these feature flags, especially feature-async. For example:

[features]
# Default features
default = []
# Enables async functionality (TODO: Implement async features)
feature-async = []
engine/worker/src/factory.rs (2)

10-19: LGTM: Well-implemented lazy initialization of built-in action factories.

The use of Lazy for initialization is good for performance. The code effectively combines mappings from different sources into a single HashMap.

Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this static variable for improved code documentation:

/// Combines action factory mappings from sink, source, and processor modules.
pub(crate) static BUILTIN_ACTION_FACTORIES: Lazy<HashMap<String, NodeKind>> = Lazy::new(|| {
    // ... (existing code)
});

21-22: LGTM: Consistent implementation of PLATEAU action factories.

The implementation is concise and follows the same pattern as BUILTIN_ACTION_FACTORIES.

Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this static variable:

/// Provides action factory mappings specific to PLATEAU processing.
pub(crate) static PLATEAU_ACTION_FACTORIES: Lazy<HashMap<String, NodeKind>> =
    Lazy::new(|| PLATEAU_MAPPINGS.clone());
engine/worker/src/main.rs (3)

24-26: Implement input handling for yaml, job_id, and action_log_uri

Currently, the variables yaml, job_id, and action_log_uri are hardcoded with placeholder values and TODO comments (lines 24-26). To make the application functional, you need to implement logic to read these values from appropriate sources, such as command-line arguments, environment variables, or configuration files.

Would you like assistance in implementing the input handling logic or opening a GitHub issue to track this task?


67-69: Implement input handling for yaml, job_id, and action_log_uri

Currently, the variables yaml, job_id, and action_log_uri are hardcoded with placeholder values and TODO comments (lines 67-69). To make the application functional, you need to implement logic to read these values from appropriate sources, such as command-line arguments, environment variables, or configuration files.

Would you like assistance in implementing the input handling logic or opening a GitHub issue to track this task?


15-18: Complete the incomplete comment

The comment on lines 17-18 seems incomplete: Once you've decided which to use, The sentence is unfinished. Please complete the comment for clarity.

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 67ab807 and aaec651.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • engine/Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock, !**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (4)
  • api/internal/app/actions.go (1 hunks)
  • engine/worker/Cargo.toml (2 hunks)
  • engine/worker/src/factory.rs (1 hunks)
  • engine/worker/src/main.rs (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
engine/worker/Cargo.toml (1)

35-36: New dependencies added

The addition of once_cell and uuid as workspace dependencies is appropriate. These are commonly used libraries that can be beneficial for the project:

  • once_cell is useful for lazy initialization of global variables or singletons.
  • uuid is valuable for generating unique identifiers, which can be crucial in distributed systems.

Using .workspace = true ensures consistent versioning across the project, which is a good practice.

To ensure these new dependencies are properly integrated and used in the project, let's verify their usage:

Verification successful

Dependency Integration Verified Successfully

The once_cell and uuid dependencies have been properly integrated and are actively used across multiple modules in the project. This confirms that their addition as workspace dependencies is appropriate and beneficial for the project's functionality.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of new dependencies in the project

# Check for imports of once_cell
echo "Checking usage of once_cell:"
rg --type rust "use once_cell" ./src

# Check for imports of uuid
echo "Checking usage of uuid:"
rg --type rust "use uuid" ./src

# If no results are found, it might indicate that these dependencies are not yet used in the code.

Length of output: 288


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Locate Rust source files and verify the usage of once_cell and uuid dependencies

# Find all Rust source files
echo "Locating Rust source files:"
fd --type file --extension rs

# After locating the files, search for imports of once_cell
echo "Checking usage of once_cell:"
fd --type file --extension rs | xargs rg "use once_cell"

# Check for imports of uuid
echo "Checking usage of uuid:"
fd --type file --extension rs | xargs rg "use uuid"

Length of output: 22028

engine/worker/src/factory.rs (1)

1-8: LGTM: Imports are well-organized and appropriate.

The imports are concise and relevant to the functionality being implemented. The use of aliases for ACTION_FACTORY_MAPPINGS from different modules improves readability.

api/internal/app/actions.go (1)

90-90: Approve change, but consider improvements

The URL update reflects a project structure change, moving actions.json into the engine subdirectory. While this change is valid, there are a few points to consider:

  1. The hardcoded nature of the URL, as mentioned in the comment, is not ideal for maintainability and flexibility.
  2. We should verify that the file exists at the new location to prevent potential runtime errors.

To verify the file's existence and suggest improvements, consider the following:

Consider implementing a more configurable approach:

  1. Use an environment variable: os.Getenv("ACTIONS_JSON_URL")
  2. Use a configuration file with a library like Viper: viper.GetString("actions_json_url")

This would allow for easier updates and environment-specific configurations.

engine/worker/src/factory.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
engine/worker/src/main.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
engine/worker/src/main.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
engine/worker/src/main.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
engine/worker/src/main.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2a388a8 and b84f1c8.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • engine/cli/src/factory.rs (1 hunks)
  • engine/worker/src/factory.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • engine/worker/src/factory.rs
Additional comments not posted (1)
engine/cli/src/factory.rs (1)

Line range hint 1-27: Overall excellent refactoring of action factory initializations

The changes in this file demonstrate a consistent approach to refactoring, utilizing functional programming concepts and iterator chaining. These modifications have improved code readability, reduced mutable state, and enhanced maintainability without altering the core functionality.

The suggested minor optimizations, if implemented, could further improve the code by reducing unnecessary cloning operations.

Great job on this refactoring effort!

engine/cli/src/factory.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
engine/cli/src/factory.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant