Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(engine): refactor workflow actions to remove Noop actions and enhance result file creation #535

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 27, 2024

Conversation

miseyu
Copy link
Contributor

@miseyu miseyu commented Sep 27, 2024

Overview

What I've done

What I haven't done

How I tested

Screenshot

Which point I want you to review particularly

Memo

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced workflow functionality with the addition of new actions:
      • FeatureMergerCreateResult for merging features.
      • AttributeMapperCreateResult for mapping input data attributes.
      • FileWriterTsvCreateResult for generating TSV output files.
  • Improvements
    • Removed placeholder actions to streamline processing.
    • Updated expressions and control flow for better data handling.

@miseyu miseyu requested a review from a team as a code owner September 27, 2024 04:14
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 27, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces substantial changes to the workflow.yml file, focusing on the removal of several "NoopSink" actions and the addition of new functional actions. Key modifications include the introduction of FeatureMergerCreateResult, AttributeMapperCreateResult, and FileWriterTsvCreateResult, which enhance data processing capabilities. Additionally, expressions have been updated to align with the new data structure, and control flow adjustments have been made to reflect the new connections between actions.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/quality-check/.../workflow.yml Removed three "NoopSink" actions and added three new actions: FeatureMergerCreateResult, AttributeMapperCreateResult, and FileWriterTsvCreateResult. Updated expressions and modified control flow connections accordingly.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

engine

Poem

🐇 In the meadow where workflows play,
New actions hop in, brightening the day!
No more Noops, just features that shine,
Merging and mapping, all tasks align.
With each little change, the process grows,
A dance of data, as the rabbit knows! 🐇


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 65380c8 and 921eb68.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/quality-check/03-tran-rwy-trk-squr-wwy/workflow.yml (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/quality-check/03-tran-rwy-trk-squr-wwy/workflow.yml (4)

Line range hint 1-361: LGTM: Existing node changes look good.

The changes made to the existing nodes in the workflow are minimal and appear to be mostly related to syntax updates or minor logic adjustments. These changes maintain the overall structure and functionality of the workflow while potentially improving readability or consistency.

Also applies to: 363-382, 384-384


Line range hint 1-661: Overall, excellent improvements to the workflow.

The changes made to this workflow file significantly enhance its functionality by adding comprehensive result file creation. The new nodes and connections seamlessly integrate with the existing structure, providing valuable output for the quality check process. These improvements will make it easier to analyze and act upon the results of the quality checks.

Key improvements:

  1. Addition of result file creation nodes (FeatureMergerCreateResult, AttributeMapperCreateResult, FileWriterTsvCreateResult).
  2. Proper integration of new nodes with existing quality check nodes through edge connections.
  3. Maintenance of the existing workflow structure while adding new features.

To ensure the completeness and correctness of these changes, please run the verification scripts provided in the previous comments. These will help identify any potentially missing attributes or unconnected quality check nodes.


619-661: Edge connections for result file creation look good.

The new edge connections successfully integrate the result file creation nodes into the existing workflow. They ensure that the outputs from various quality check nodes are properly fed into the FeatureMergerCreateResult node and subsequently processed for the final output.

To ensure all necessary quality check results are being included, please run the following script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all quality check nodes are connected to the FeatureMergerCreateResult node

# Get all node names that seem to be quality check nodes
quality_check_nodes=$(rg 'name: .*(?:Validator|Aggregator|Counter|Filter)' engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/quality-check/03-tran-rwy-trk-squr-wwy/workflow.yml -o | sed 's/name: //')

# Get nodes connected to FeatureMergerCreateResult
connected_nodes=$(rg -A 4 'to: 9f84917a-560c-468d-b78d-e862f5984120' engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/quality-check/03-tran-rwy-trk-squr-wwy/workflow.yml | rg 'from:' -o | sed 's/from: //')

echo "Quality check nodes not connected to FeatureMergerCreateResult:"
comm -23 <(echo "$quality_check_nodes" | sort) <(echo "$connected_nodes" | sort)

This script will help identify any quality check nodes that might not be connected to the FeatureMergerCreateResult node, ensuring comprehensive result collection.


385-444: Excellent addition of result file creation nodes.

The new nodes (FeatureMergerCreateResult, AttributeMapperCreateResult, and FileWriterTsvCreateResult) significantly enhance the workflow by providing a clear summary of the quality check results. This addition improves the overall functionality and usability of the quality check process.

Please verify that all necessary attributes are included in the AttributeMapperCreateResult node. Consider running the following script to check for any potentially missing attributes:

This script will help identify any attributes used in the workflow that might be missing from the result file creation process.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Sep 27, 2024

Deploy Preview for reearth-flow canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 921eb68
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/reearth-flow/deploys/66f6311a13ba38000871f627

@miseyu miseyu merged commit 2be2b41 into main Sep 27, 2024
17 checks passed
@miseyu miseyu deleted the feature/modify-tran-quality-check-workflow branch September 27, 2024 04:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant