-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(web): preset layer style #1156
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@mkumbobeaty has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 6 minutes and 59 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
✅ Deploy Preview for reearth-web ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-150
: Overall feedback on changes to StylesPanel component.The changes to the
StylesPanel
component primarily involve the integration of a newPresetLayerStyle
component and the removal of the previous layer style addition mechanism. These modifications appear to be part of a refactoring effort to improve layer style management functionality.While the changes seem logical, there are a few areas that would benefit from additional clarification:
- The specific functionality of the new
PresetLayerStyle
component.- The new process for adding layer styles and how it compares to the previous implementation.
- Any potential impacts on user experience or existing workflows.
Consider adding inline comments or updating the component's documentation to address these points. This will enhance code clarity and maintainability, especially for developers who may be unfamiliar with the recent changes.
To further improve the component:
- Consider adding prop types or TypeScript interfaces for the
PresetLayerStyle
component props to enhance type safety and self-documentation.- If the
PresetLayerStyle
component introduces any new state management, ensure it aligns with the existing state management approach used in theStylesPanel
.- Review the component's performance, especially if the
PresetLayerStyle
component introduces any complex operations or state updates.web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/PresetLayerStyle/index.tsx (2)
31-47
: LGTM: Component definition and handleLayerStyleAddition function are well-implemented.The component follows React best practices, and the use of
useCallback
is appropriate. The function generates a default name if none is provided, which is a good fallback.Consider using a template literal for the default style name to improve readability:
- name: styleName - ? styleName - : `${t("Style_")}${layerStyles?.length ?? 0 + 1}`, + name: styleName ?? `${t("Style_")}${(layerStyles?.length ?? 0) + 1}`,
49-137
: LGTM: Menu items are well-structured and comprehensive.The menu structure is well-organized, with appropriate use of internationalization for titles. Each menu item correctly calls
handleLayerStyleAddition
with the right parameters.Consider extracting the menu items into a separate configuration file to improve maintainability and reduce the size of this component. This would make it easier to add or modify styles in the future. For example:
// menuItems.ts import { t } from "@reearth/services/i18n"; import * as styles from "./presetLayerStyles"; export const getMenuItems = (handleLayerStyleAddition: Function) => [ { id: "empty", title: t("Empty"), onClick: () => handleLayerStyleAddition({}) }, // ... other menu items ]; // In your component import { getMenuItems } from "./menuItems"; const menuItems = getMenuItems(handleLayerStyleAddition);web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/PresetLayerStyle/presetLayerStyles.ts (5)
21-52
: LGTM: Professional style definitions are comprehensive.The
professionalStyle
constant provides a more detailed set of styles with good customization options. The addition ofselectedFeatureColor
is great for interactive maps.Consider extracting color values (e.g., '#E9373D', '#F1AF02') into named constants at the top of the file for better maintainability and reusability across different styles.
100-110
: LGTM: Extruded polygon style is well-defined.The
extrudedPolygonStyle
constant correctly extends the basic polygon style with extrusion capabilities.Consider adding a comment explaining the expected format or unit of the
extrudedHeight
expression value. This would help developers using this style to provide the correct input data.
120-161
: LGTM: Simple style provides flexible, data-driven styling.The
simpleStyle
constant makes excellent use of expressions to create dynamic, data-driven styles. This approach allows for great flexibility in styling based on feature properties.Consider adding a comment or documentation that explains the expected data format and property names (e.g.,
marker-color
,fill-opacity
,stroke-width
) that this style expects. This would help developers ensure their data is structured correctly to work with this style.
183-211
: LGTM: Sketch layer style is well-defined and consistent.The
sketchLayerStyle
constant provides a comprehensive set of styles for creating a sketch-like appearance across different geometry types. The consistent use of properties likehideIndicator
andselectedFeatureColor
is commendable.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of the
classificationType: "terrain"
property for polygons. This would help other developers understand its impact on rendering.
1-211
: Overall, excellent preset styles with room for minor improvements.This file provides a comprehensive set of preset styles covering various geometry types and use cases. The styles are well-structured and make good use of dynamic expressions where appropriate.
To further improve the file:
Consider grouping related styles (e.g., point styles, polygon styles) using namespaces or nested objects. This could improve organization and make it easier to import specific style groups.
Add JSDoc comments for each exported constant, briefly explaining its purpose and any specific requirements (e.g., expected data properties).
Extract common color values and other repeated properties into shared constants at the top of the file to improve maintainability.
These changes would enhance the file's structure, documentation, and maintainability without altering its functionality.
web/src/services/i18n/translations/en.yml (1)
97-109
: LGTM! Consider adding context for some entries.The new translation entries align well with the PR objective of implementing a preset layer style feature. Good job on maintaining consistency in naming and logical grouping.
A few suggestions to enhance clarity and maintainability:
Consider adding comments or context for entries that might not be immediately clear, such as "Plateau" or "Color buildings by height". This can help future translators understand the intended usage.
Review the empty string values to ensure they are intentional. If they are placeholders for future translations, you might want to add a comment indicating this.
Example of adding context:
# Style for elevation data visualization Plateau: '' # Option to color 3D buildings based on their height Color buildings by height: ''
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/PresetLayerStyle/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/PresetLayerStyle/presetLayerStyles.ts (1 hunks)
- web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/index.tsx (2 hunks)
- web/src/services/i18n/translations/en.yml (1 hunks)
- web/src/services/i18n/translations/ja.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/index.tsx (3)
11-11
: LGTM: New import statement added correctly.The import statement for the
PresetLayerStyle
component is correctly placed and follows the existing import structure. The component name follows the PascalCase convention, which is appropriate for React components.
64-67
: Clarification needed on new layer style addition process.The previous
handleLayerStyleAddition
function and theIconButton
for adding new layer styles have been removed. It appears that this functionality has been moved to the newPresetLayerStyle
component. Could you please clarify:
- How users can now add new layer styles?
- What advantages does this new approach offer over the previous implementation?
- Has this change been documented for users who might be familiar with the old process?
To better understand the changes in layer style addition functionality, let's search for related code:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for layer style addition related code # Test 1: Search for functions or methods related to adding layer styles rg --type typescript -i 'add.*layer.*style' # Test 2: Search for components or elements that might be used for adding layer styles rg --type typescript -i '(button|icon|menu).*add.*style'Consider adding inline comments or updating the component's documentation to explain the new layer style addition process. This will help maintain code clarity and assist future developers in understanding the component's functionality.
64-67
: Integration of PresetLayerStyle looks good, but more context needed.The
PresetLayerStyle
component is correctly integrated within theActionsWrapper
. The props passed (layerStyles
andonLayerStyleAdd
) seem appropriate for managing layer styles. However, it would be helpful to provide more context about this new component's functionality and how it interacts with the rest of theStylesPanel
.To better understand the
PresetLayerStyle
component, let's check its implementation:web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/PresetLayerStyle/index.tsx (4)
1-29
: LGTM: Imports and type definitions are well-structured.The imports are appropriate for the component's functionality, and the prop types are well-defined, enhancing type safety.
139-145
: LGTM: Component render is clean and consistent with the design system.The rendering logic is simple and straightforward. The use of
PopupMenu
andIconButton
from reearth-ui ensures consistency with the design system.
147-147
: LGTM: Component export is standard.The component is correctly exported as the default export, which is a standard practice for React components.
1-147
: Overall assessment: Well-implemented component with minor suggestions for improvement.The
PresetLayerStyle
component is well-structured and achieves its goal of providing a user interface for adding predefined layer styles. It follows React best practices, uses appropriate hooks, and integrates well with the existing design system.Key strengths:
- Clear prop types and component structure
- Effective use of
useCallback
for performance optimization- Comprehensive menu structure with internationalization support
Suggestions for improvement:
- Consider extracting menu items into a separate configuration file
- Minor readability enhancement in the
handleLayerStyleAddition
functionThese changes would further improve the maintainability and readability of the code, but the current implementation is already solid and functional.
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/PresetLayerStyle/presetLayerStyles.ts (4)
1-19
: LGTM: Default style definitions look good.The
defaultStyle
constant provides a good set of default values for markers, polygons, and polylines. The use of expressions for dynamic values (e.g.,${extrudedHeight}
) and consistent use ofclamp
for height reference are appropriate.
54-64
: LGTM: Point style is well-defined, but clarification needed.The
pointStyle
constant provides a good set of properties for styling point markers.Could you clarify the reason for using
heightReference: "relative"
here, while other styles use"clamp"
? This difference might affect how the points are displayed in certain scenarios.
81-89
: LGTM: Polyline style is well-defined and consistent.The
polylineStyle
constant provides a good set of properties for styling polylines. It's consistent with previous definitions and includesselectedFeatureColor
for interactive features.
112-118
: LGTM: 3D tiles style is defined, but clarification needed.The
threeDTilesStyle
constant provides basic styling for 3D tiles.Could you provide more information about the
colorBlendMode: "highlight"
setting? It would be helpful to understand how this affects the rendering of 3D tiles and if there are other possible values for this property.
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/PresetLayerStyle/presetLayerStyles.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
export const polygonStyle = { | ||
polygon: { | ||
fillColor: "#E9373D", | ||
heightReference: "clamp", | ||
hideIndicator: "false", | ||
selectedFeatureColor: "#F1AF02" | ||
} | ||
}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding stroke properties for more flexibility.
The polygonStyle
constant provides basic styling for polygons. However, it lacks stroke-related properties that were present in other styles.
Consider adding stroke
, strokeColor
, and strokeWidth
properties to provide more styling options. This would make the style more consistent with other polygon styles and offer greater flexibility.
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/PresetLayerStyle/presetLayerStyles.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Empty: '' | ||
Sketch: '' | ||
Default: デフォルト | ||
Professional: '' | ||
Basic Geometry: '' | ||
Points: '' | ||
Point with label: '' | ||
Polyline: '' | ||
Polygon: '' | ||
Extruded polygon: '' | ||
Simple Style: '' | ||
Plateau: '' | ||
Color buildings by height: '' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Complete missing translations for new entries
Several new translation entries have been added, which is great for internationalization. However, some of these new entries have empty values:
- Empty (line 97)
- Sketch (line 98)
- Professional (line 100)
- Basic Geometry (line 101)
- Points (line 102)
- Point with label (line 103)
- Polyline (line 104)
- Polygon (line 105)
- Extruded polygon (line 106)
- Simple Style (line 107)
- Plateau (line 108)
- Color buildings by height (line 109)
Please provide appropriate Japanese translations for these entries to ensure a complete localization experience for Japanese users.
To resolve this, you can add translations for the empty entries. For example:
-Empty: ''
+Empty: '空'
-Sketch: ''
+Sketch: 'スケッチ'
-Professional: ''
+Professional: 'プロフェッショナル'
Continue this pattern for the remaining empty entries.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/PresetLayerStyle/index.tsx (1)
32-55
: LGTM: Component structure and hooks usage are well-implemented.The component is well-structured as a functional component, and the hooks are used appropriately. The
useCallback
hook is correctly implemented with proper dependencies, which is good for performance optimization.Consider memoizing the
layerStyleAdded
state setter function:-const [layerStyleAdded, setLayerStyleAdded] = useState<string | undefined>( - undefined -); +const [layerStyleAdded, setLayerStyleAdded] = useState<string | undefined>(undefined); +const memoizedSetLayerStyleAdded = useCallback((value: string | undefined) => { + setLayerStyleAdded(value); +}, []);Then use
memoizedSetLayerStyleAdded
instead ofsetLayerStyleAdded
in thehandleLayerStyleAddition
function. This can help prevent unnecessary re-renders in child components that depend on this function.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/PresetLayerStyle/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/PresetLayerStyle/presetLayerStyles.ts (1 hunks)
- web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/index.tsx (2 hunks)
- web/src/services/i18n/translations/en.yml (2 hunks)
- web/src/services/i18n/translations/ja.yml (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- web/src/services/i18n/translations/en.yml
- web/src/services/i18n/translations/ja.yml
🔇 Additional comments (13)
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/index.tsx (3)
11-11
: LGTM: PresetLayerStyle import added correctly.The import statement for the new PresetLayerStyle component is correctly formatted and follows good practices by importing from the same directory.
Line range hint
1-150
: Overall changes look good, consider updating tests and documentation.The integration of the PresetLayerStyle component and the removal of the handleLayerStyleAddition function represent a significant change in how layer styles are added. The overall structure and existing functionalities of the StylesPanel component have been preserved, which is good for maintaining consistency.
To ensure the changes are fully reflected in the codebase:
- Update any existing tests that may have been using the removed handleLayerStyleAddition function.
- Update the component's documentation or comments to reflect the new way of adding layer styles.
- Verify that the PresetLayerStyle component is properly tested.
Run the following script to check for potential areas that might need updates:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find potential areas needing updates due to the changes # Test 1: Search for tests related to handleLayerStyleAddition echo "Searching for tests related to handleLayerStyleAddition:" rg --type typescript 'test.*handleLayerStyleAddition' # Test 2: Search for documentation mentioning layer style addition echo "Searching for documentation mentioning layer style addition:" rg --type typescript --type markdown 'layer style addition' # Test 3: Check for tests of the PresetLayerStyle component echo "Checking for tests of the PresetLayerStyle component:" rg --type typescript 'test.*PresetLayerStyle'Please review the results of this script and make any necessary updates to tests and documentation.
64-67
: LGTM: PresetLayerStyle component integrated correctly.The PresetLayerStyle component is well-integrated into the existing structure, receiving the necessary props for its functionality.
Please verify that the previous add button (IconButton) has been removed as mentioned in the AI summary. Run the following script to check:
If the script returns no results, it confirms that the previous add button has been removed as expected.
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Previous add button successfully removed.
No instances of the previous
IconButton
with add functionality were found inLayerStylePanel/index.tsx
.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify removal of the previous add button for layer styles # Test: Search for IconButton with add functionality rg --type typescript 'IconButton.*icon="add".*onClick={handleLayerStyleAddition}' web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/index.tsxLength of output: 641
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify removal of the previous add button for layer styles # Test: Search for IconButton with add functionality in TypeScript and TSX files rg --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' 'IconButton.*icon="add".*onClick={handleLayerStyleAddition}' web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/index.tsxLength of output: 327
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify removal of the previous add button for layer styles # Test: Search for IconButton with add functionality in TypeScript and TSX files rg --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' 'IconButton.*icon="add".*onClick=\{handleLayerStyleAddition\}' web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/index.tsxLength of output: 155
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/PresetLayerStyle/index.tsx (3)
1-30
: LGTM: Imports and type definitions are well-structured.The imports are appropriately organized, and the
PresetLayerStyleProps
type is well-defined with clear prop types. This structure enhances code readability and type safety.
151-159
: LGTM: Component rendering is clean and appropriate.The component's return statement is concise and well-structured. The use of
PopupMenu
with themenuItems
prop and anIconButton
as the label is an excellent UI design choice. This implementation provides a clean and intuitive user interface for selecting preset layer styles.
1-159
: Overall, the implementation is solid with room for minor improvements.The
PresetLayerStyle
component is well-structured and follows React best practices. It effectively implements the preset layer style functionality with a clean and intuitive UI. The use of hooks, internationalization, and type definitions is commendable.To further enhance the code:
- Consider memoizing the state setter function for
layerStyleAdded
.- Add a safety check for
layerStyles
in theuseEffect
hook.- Extract the
menuItems
definition to a separate file or function for improved maintainability.These suggestions aim to optimize performance slightly and improve the long-term maintainability of the code. Great job on implementing this feature!
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/PresetLayerStyle/presetLayerStyles.ts (7)
3-21
: Default Style Defined CorrectlyThe
defaultStyle
constant is well-structured, and the properties formarker
,polygon
, andpolyline
are appropriately set.
23-54
: Professional Style Properties are ConsistentThe
professionalStyle
provides enhanced styling with consistent properties acrossmarker
,polygon
, andpolyline
. The use of selected feature colors and point styling is well-implemented.
56-66
: Point Style Defined CorrectlyThe
pointStyle
constant is correctly configured, with appropriate properties for point display.
83-92
: Polyline Style Configured AppropriatelyThe
polylineStyle
constant sets up the polyline properties effectively, includingclampToGround
and stroke settings.
102-112
: Extruded Polygon Style is Well-DefinedThe
extrudedPolygonStyle
provides extruded height configurations correctly, enhancing the visual representation of polygons.
114-120
: 3D Tiles Style Parameters Set CorrectlyThe
threeDTilesStyle
constant is properly defined with accurate color settings and blend modes.
122-163
: Verify Expression Properties in Simple StyleThe
simpleStyle
uses expressions for dynamic styling based on properties like${marker-color}
,${marker-size}
, and others. Please ensure that these property placeholders correspond to actual data fields in your dataset to prevent runtime errors.Run the following script to check if all the expression properties are present in your data:
const menuItems: PopupMenuItem[] = [ | ||
{ | ||
id: "empty", | ||
title: t("Empty"), | ||
onClick: () => handleLayerStyleAddition({}) | ||
}, | ||
{ | ||
id: "default", | ||
title: t("Default"), | ||
onClick: () => handleLayerStyleAddition(defaultStyle, "Default") | ||
}, | ||
{ | ||
id: "professional", | ||
title: t("Professional"), | ||
onClick: () => handleLayerStyleAddition(professionalStyle, "Professional") | ||
}, | ||
{ | ||
id: "basicGeometry", | ||
title: t("Basic Geometry"), | ||
icon: "folderSimple", | ||
subItem: [ | ||
{ | ||
id: "point", | ||
title: t("Points"), | ||
onClick: () => handleLayerStyleAddition(pointStyle, "Points") | ||
}, | ||
{ | ||
id: "pointWithLabel", | ||
title: t("Point with label"), | ||
onClick: () => | ||
handleLayerStyleAddition(pointWithLabelStyle, "Point_with_label") | ||
}, | ||
{ | ||
id: "polyline", | ||
title: t("Polyline"), | ||
onClick: () => handleLayerStyleAddition(polylineStyle, "Polyline") | ||
}, | ||
{ | ||
id: "polygon", | ||
title: t("Polygon"), | ||
onClick: () => handleLayerStyleAddition(polygonStyle, "Polygon") | ||
}, | ||
{ | ||
id: "extrudedPolygon", | ||
title: t("Extruded polygon"), | ||
onClick: () => | ||
handleLayerStyleAddition(extrudedPolygonStyle, "Extruded_polygon") | ||
}, | ||
{ | ||
id: "threedTiles", | ||
title: t("3D Tiles"), | ||
onClick: () => handleLayerStyleAddition(threeDTilesStyle, "3D_tiles") | ||
} | ||
] | ||
}, | ||
{ | ||
id: "geometry", | ||
title: t("Geometry"), | ||
icon: "folderSimple", | ||
subItem: [ | ||
{ | ||
id: "simpleStyle", | ||
title: t("Simple Style"), | ||
onClick: () => handleLayerStyleAddition(simpleStyle, "Simple_style") | ||
} | ||
] | ||
}, | ||
{ | ||
id: "plateau", | ||
title: t("Plateau"), | ||
icon: "folderSimple", | ||
subItem: [ | ||
{ | ||
id: "colorBuilding", | ||
title: t("Color buildings by height"), | ||
onClick: () => | ||
handleLayerStyleAddition( | ||
colorBuildingsByHeight, | ||
"Color_buildings_by_height" | ||
) | ||
} | ||
] | ||
} | ||
]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider extracting menuItems definition for improved maintainability.
The menuItems
array is well-structured and comprehensive, with proper use of internationalization and consistent onClick handlers. However, its large size might impact readability and maintainability of the component.
Consider extracting the menuItems
definition to a separate file or function. This would make the component more focused and easier to maintain. For example:
- Create a new file
menuItems.ts
in the same directory. - Move the
menuItems
array to this file, exporting it as a function that takest
andhandleLayerStyleAddition
as parameters. - Import and use this function in the component.
Example:
// menuItems.ts
import { PopupMenuItem } from "@reearth/beta/lib/reearth-ui";
import { TFunction } from "i18next"; // or your i18n library
export const getMenuItems = (
t: TFunction,
handleLayerStyleAddition: (value?: Record<string, unknown>, styleName?: string) => void
): PopupMenuItem[] => [
// ... existing menuItems array
];
// In your component file
import { getMenuItems } from "./menuItems";
// Inside the component
const menuItems = getMenuItems(t, handleLayerStyleAddition);
This refactoring will improve the component's readability and make it easier to maintain and update the menu items in the future.
Overview
What I've done
What I haven't done
How I tested
Which point I want you to review particularly
Memo
Summary by CodeRabbit
PresetLayerStyle
component for adding predefined layer styles in the map editor.