refactor(web): layer style editor node support typography #1168
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several enhancements across multiple components in the style interface of the application. Key modifications include updating the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
✅ Deploy Preview for reearth-web ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (21)
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StyleNode/Field/BooleanSelectorInput.tsx (2)
4-7: LGTM: Well-defined constant. Consider internationalization.The
booleanOptionsconstant is well-structured and follows best practices. However, for better maintainability and localization support, consider using internationalized labels.You could refactor it as follows:
import { useTranslation } from 'react-i18next'; // Inside the component const { t } = useTranslation(); const booleanOptions = [ { value: "true", label: t('true') }, { value: "false", label: t('false') } ];
14-24: LGTM: Component logic is sound. Consider improving readability.The
BooleanSelectorInputcomponent is well-implemented:
- It correctly handles all possible states (true, false, undefined).
- The
onChangehandler properly converts the string value back to a boolean or undefined.However, the ternary operator used for value conversion might be hard to read. Consider refactoring for improved readability:
const BooleanSelectorInput: FC<Props> = ({ value, onChange }) => { const stringValue = value === true ? "true" : value === false ? "false" : ""; const handleChange = (v: string) => { if (v === "true") onChange(true); else if (v === "false") onChange(false); else onChange(undefined); }; return ( <Selector value={stringValue} options={booleanOptions} onChange={handleChange} /> ); };This refactoring separates the logic into smaller, more readable chunks while maintaining the same functionality.
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StyleNode/ExpressionTab.tsx (2)
7-9: LGTM: Props updated for flexibility, consider default valuesThe changes to the
Propstype improve the component's flexibility. MakingexpressionandonUpdateoptional and adding thedisabledprop are good practices.Consider adding default values for the optional props in the component declaration to ensure predictable behavior:
const ExpressionTab: FC<Props> = ({ expression = "", disabled = false, onUpdate = () => {} }) => { // ... }
17-30: LGTM: Conditional rendering implemented wellThe addition of conditional rendering based on the
disabledprop is well-implemented. The use ofTypographyfor the disabled state message and preserving the existing functionality when not disabled is good.Consider extracting the disabled state message to a constant for better maintainability:
const DISABLED_MESSAGE = "UI doesn't support expression on this property, please edit code directly."; // In the component: {t(DISABLED_MESSAGE)}This makes it easier to update the message in the future and keeps the JSX cleaner.
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StyleNode/Field/index.tsx (2)
22-50: LGTM: fieldComponents updates align with new features.The changes to the
fieldComponentsobject, including the use ofBooleanSelectorInputand the addition of thetypographycase, are well-implemented and consistent with the PR objectives.Consider using object shorthand notation for the
fieldComponentsobject to make the code more concise. For example:const fieldComponents = { switch: (props: FieldProps) => ( <BooleanSelectorInput value={props.value as boolean} onChange={props.onUpdate} /> ), number: (props: FieldProps) => ( <NumberInput value={props.value as number} onChange={props.onUpdate} /> ), // ... other cases ... };This change would make the code slightly more readable and maintainable.
Issues Found: Residual Usage of Old
PropsTypeThe verification process revealed that while the new components and
FieldPropstype are consistently used, there are still multiple instances of the oldPropstype within theLayerStylePanelfeature.Files with Old
PropsUsage:
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/index.tsxweb/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/LayerStyleCard.tsxweb/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/hooks.tsxweb/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StylePanel.tsxweb/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StyleNode/index.tsxweb/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StyleNode/Field/TypographyInput.tsxweb/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StyleNode/Field/BooleanSelectorInput.tsxweb/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StyleNode/ExpressionTab.tsxweb/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StyleNode/ValueTab.tsxweb/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StyleNode/ConditionsTab.tsxRecommendation:
Please update these files to replace the oldPropstype with the newFieldPropsor other relevant updated types to ensure consistency across the codebase.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-59: Overall, changes align well with PR objectives and improve code quality.The modifications in this file successfully implement support for marker properties, specifically the
typographyfield, as mentioned in the PR objectives. The changes also improve the overall structure and flexibility of theFieldcomponent and its related types.Key improvements:
- Introduction of
TypographyInputfor handling typography fields.- Enhanced flexibility with optional
fieldprop inFieldProps.- Improved boolean input handling with
BooleanSelectorInput.These changes contribute to the refactoring of the layer style editor and align well with the PR's goals. The code quality is good, with only minor suggestions for improvement.
To ensure that the changes are consistent across the codebase, please run the following verification script:
This script will help ensure that the new components and types are used consistently across the codebase and that there are no leftover references to the old
Propstype in related files.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of new components and types across the codebase # Test 1: Check for usage of TypographyInput echo "Checking for TypographyInput usage:" rg --type typescript --type tsx "TypographyInput" # Test 2: Check for usage of BooleanSelectorInput echo "Checking for BooleanSelectorInput usage:" rg --type typescript --type tsx "BooleanSelectorInput" # Test 3: Check for usage of FieldProps type echo "Checking for FieldProps type usage:" rg --type typescript --type tsx "FieldProps" # Test 4: Check for any remaining usage of old 'Props' type in related files echo "Checking for any remaining usage of old 'Props' type in related files:" rg --type typescript --type tsx "type Props" "web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel"Length of output: 795
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Corrected verification of usage of new components and types across the codebase # Test 1: Check for usage of TypographyInput echo "Checking for TypographyInput usage:" rg --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" "TypographyInput" # Test 2: Check for usage of BooleanSelectorInput echo "Checking for BooleanSelectorInput usage:" rg --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" "BooleanSelectorInput" # Test 3: Check for usage of FieldProps type echo "Checking for FieldProps type usage:" rg --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" "FieldProps" # Test 4: Check for any remaining usage of old 'Props' type in related files echo "Checking for any remaining usage of old 'Props' type in related files:" rg --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" "type Props" "web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel"Length of output: 9840
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StyleNode/Field/TypographyInput.tsx (2)
38-89: LGTM: Well-structured component with a minor suggestion for improvement.The TypographyInput component is well-implemented with clear separation of concerns for each typography property. The use of the useT hook for internationalization is commendable.
For improved type safety, consider using a type assertion or optional chaining when spreading the potentially undefined
valueobject in the onChange handlers. For example:onChange?.({ ...(value ?? {}), fontFamily: v as string })This ensures that spreading an undefined value doesn't cause runtime errors.
91-131: LGTM: Well-implemented styled components with good use of theming.The styled components are well-structured and make good use of the theme properties for consistent styling. The use of flexbox for layout ensures responsiveness. The PropertyItem component is a nice abstraction that promotes consistency across the different property inputs.
One minor suggestion: Consider extracting the common styles (like width: "50%", flexGrow: 0) shared between Title and Content into a separate styled component or a reusable style object to promote DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principle.
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StyleNode/index.tsx (1)
96-101: Improved icon color logic, but consider refiningsetActiveTabThe updated icon color logic correctly utilizes the new
matchproperty, improving consistency with theactionsarray. The simplifiedonClickhandler is more concise.However, consider refining the
setActiveTabcall. Currently, it always sets toaction.id, which might not be the intended behavior for all cases, especially for actions with multiple matches.Consider updating the
onClickhandler to set the active tab to the first matched value:onClick={() => setActiveTab(action.match[0])}This ensures that the active tab is always set to a valid value from the
matcharray.web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StyleNode/ConditionsTab.tsx (4)
22-25: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc comments for better documentation.The changes to the
Propstype improve the component's flexibility by makingfieldandonUpdateoptional and introducing adisabledproperty. This allows for more versatile usage of the component.Consider adding JSDoc comments to describe the purpose of each prop, especially the new
disabledproperty. This would enhance code documentation and improve developer experience. For example:type Props = { /** The list of style conditions */ conditions?: StyleCondition[]; /** The appearance field to edit */ field?: AppearanceField; /** Options for the value selector */ valueOptions?: { value: string; label: string }[]; /** Whether the component is disabled */ disabled?: boolean; /** Callback function to update the conditions */ onUpdate?: (value: StyleCondition[]) => void; };
74-74: LGTM! Consider memoizing the wrappedonUpdatefunction.The use of optional chaining (
?.) when callingonUpdateis a good practice, aligning with the optional nature of the prop. This prevents potential runtime errors ifonUpdateis not provided.For a potential optimization, consider memoizing a wrapped version of
onUpdatethat includes the null check. This could simplify the code and potentially improve performance:const memoizedOnUpdate = useCallback( (updater: (prevConditions: StyleCondition[]) => StyleCondition[]) => { onUpdate?.(updater(conditions ?? [])); }, [onUpdate, conditions] ); // Then use memoizedOnUpdate in your handlers: // memoizedOnUpdate(newConditions => [...newConditions, newCondition]);This approach would centralize the null check and the access to the current conditions, potentially reducing code duplication and improving readability.
Also applies to: 94-94, 112-112, 121-121, 133-133
211-219: LGTM! Consider adding an aria-label for better accessibility.The conditional rendering based on the
disabledprop is well implemented. It provides clear feedback to the user when conditions are not supported for a specific property.To improve accessibility, consider adding an
aria-labelto theInfoWrapperto provide context for screen readers:<InfoWrapper aria-label="Conditions not supported"> <Typography size="body" color="weak"> {t( "UI doesn't support conditions on this property, please edit code directly." )} </Typography> </InfoWrapper>This addition would help users relying on screen readers to understand the purpose of this informational message.
Line range hint
1-290: Overall, excellent enhancements to the ConditionsTab component!The changes in this file effectively implement the new
disabledstate and make theConditionsTabcomponent more flexible and robust. Key improvements include:
- Updated
Propstype with optional properties.- Proper handling of the optional
onUpdatecallback.- Conditional rendering based on the
disabledprop.- Improved styled components to support the new functionality.
These changes align well with the PR objectives of enhancing the layer style editor. The code is well-structured, follows React best practices, and improves the overall functionality of the component.
As the component grows in complexity, consider splitting it into smaller, more focused sub-components in the future. This could improve maintainability and make it easier to test individual parts of the functionality.
web/src/services/i18n/translations/en.yml (5)
115-120: Consider enhancing typography-related translations for consistency and completeness.The additions for typography options are good, but there are a few suggestions for improvement:
- Capitalize the first letter of each translation value for consistency (e.g., "Font family" instead of "font family").
- Consider adding translations for other common typography terms like "line height", "letter spacing", and "text transform".
- For text alignment options, consider adding "Justify" to complete the set.
These enhancements will provide a more comprehensive and consistent set of typography-related translations.
Also applies to: 176-178, 179-185, 186-196
113-114: Improve wording for unsupported feature messages.The messages for unsupported conditions and expressions are informative, but they could be more user-friendly. Consider the following suggestions:
"UI doesn't support conditions on this property, please edit code directly."
→ "This property doesn't support conditions in the UI. Please edit the code directly.""UI doesn't support expression on this property, please edit code directly."
→ "This property doesn't support expressions in the UI. Please edit the code directly."These changes make the messages more concise and easier to understand.
Line range hint
197-220: Standardize capitalization and punctuation in camera and position-related translations.There are some inconsistencies in the capitalization and punctuation of these translations. Consider the following improvements:
- Capitalize the first letter of each translation value consistently (e.g., "Current position" instead of "Current Position").
- Use consistent punctuation at the end of sentences (either add or remove periods for all similar entries).
- Ensure consistent capitalization in multi-word terms (e.g., "Time zone" instead of "Time Zone").
These changes will improve the overall consistency of the translations.
Line range hint
221-300: Standardize success and error messages for consistency.The new success and error messages are comprehensive, but there are some inconsistencies that should be addressed:
- Punctuation: Some messages end with periods, while others don't. Standardize this across all messages.
- Capitalization: Ensure consistent capitalization of terms like "layer", "block", "page", etc.
- Wording: Some messages use exclamation marks, while others don't. Consider using them consistently for success messages only.
- Typos: Fix typos like "Successfullly" (should be "Successfully").
- Consistency in phrasing: Standardize phrases like "Failed to..." and "Successfully...".
Example improvements:
- "Failed to add layer." → "Failed to add layer"
- "Successfully added a new layer:" → "Successfully added a new layer"
- "Successfullly created a block!:" → "Successfully created a block"
Implementing these changes will greatly improve the consistency and professionalism of the user-facing messages.
Line range hint
1-300: Consider a comprehensive review of the entire translation file.While the new additions greatly enhance the language coverage of the application, it would be beneficial to conduct a thorough review of the entire translation file to ensure:
- Consistent capitalization across all entries.
- Consistent use of punctuation, especially for similar types of messages.
- Completeness of translations for all features and UI elements.
- Consistent terminology usage throughout the file.
- Proper formatting of longer messages for readability.
This review will help maintain a high-quality, consistent user experience across the application.
web/src/services/i18n/translations/ja.yml (1)
Line range hint
1-480: Summary: Overall improvements with some remaining untranslated entriesThis update to the Japanese translation file (
ja.yml) brings several improvements:
- Enhanced consistency in message formatting (e.g., adding exclamation marks to success messages).
- Improved clarity in various translations, especially for project and story actions.
- More accurate and specific translations for certain operations (e.g., project deletion to recycle bin).
However, there are still some areas that need attention:
- Several new entries, particularly those related to UI messages and typography settings, remain untranslated.
- Ensure all new entries are translated to maintain a consistent Japanese user experience.
Please address the untranslated entries as noted in the previous comments. Once these are resolved, the translation file will provide a more comprehensive and consistent localization for Japanese users.
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/convert.ts (2)
38-40: Clarify the logic fornotSupportedpropertySetting
notSupportedto!nodeRefmeans it will betruewhennodeRefisundefinedornull. Please confirm this is the intended behavior. Adding a comment could improve code readability for future maintainers.
98-108: Ensure consistent handling of returned valuesIn the updated
parseStyleValuefunction, ensure that the returned object consistently provides the expected properties based on thevalueType. This improves clarity for consumers of this function and aids in preventing undefined property access.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
- web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StyleNode/ConditionsTab.tsx (9 hunks)
- web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StyleNode/ExpressionTab.tsx (2 hunks)
- web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StyleNode/Field/BooleanSelectorInput.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StyleNode/Field/TypographyInput.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StyleNode/Field/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StyleNode/index.tsx (3 hunks)
- web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StylePanel.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/appearanceNodes/marker.ts (1 hunks)
- web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/convert.ts (2 hunks)
- web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/types.ts (3 hunks)
- web/src/beta/lib/reearth-ui/components/Typography/index.tsx (2 hunks)
- web/src/services/i18n/translations/en.yml (1 hunks)
- web/src/services/i18n/translations/ja.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StyleNode/ConditionsTab.tsx (1)
Learnt from: mkumbobeaty PR: reearth/reearth-visualizer#1143 File: web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/NodeSystem/common/tabs/ConditionalTab.tsx:55-60 Timestamp: 2024-09-24T09:06:56.854Z Learning: The `Condition` object does not have an `id` property.
🔇 Additional comments (35)
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StyleNode/Field/BooleanSelectorInput.tsx (4)
1-2: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-structured.The imports are concise and relevant to the component's requirements. Using named imports is a good practice for better code readability and tree-shaking.
9-12: LGTM: Props type definition is clear and appropriate.The
Propstype is well-defined:
valuecorrectly uses a union type to allow forundefinedstate.onChangefunction type matches the possiblevaluetypes, ensuring type safety.This type definition provides a clear contract for the component's props, enhancing maintainability and reducing potential bugs.
26-26: LGTM: Appropriate use of default export.The component is correctly exported as the default export, which is suitable for a single component file. This allows for easy importing in other parts of the application.
1-26: Overall assessment: Well-implemented component with minor improvement opportunities.The
BooleanSelectorInputcomponent is a solid implementation that fulfills its purpose of providing a boolean selector input. It integrates well with the existing UI library and follows React best practices. The code is generally clean and type-safe.Key strengths:
- Clear and appropriate Props type definition
- Correct handling of all possible boolean states (true, false, undefined)
- Proper use of the
Selectorcomponent from the UI librarySuggestions for improvement:
- Consider internationalizing the option labels for better localization support
- Refactor the value conversion logic for improved readability
These minor enhancements would further improve the component's maintainability and flexibility. Great job overall!
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StyleNode/ExpressionTab.tsx (4)
1-2: LGTM: New imports added correctlyThe new imports for
TypographyanduseTare correctly added and necessary for the new functionality implemented in the component.
12-14: LGTM: Component declaration updated and i18n support addedThe component declaration has been correctly updated to include the new
disabledprop. The addition of theuseThook for internationalization is a great improvement for multi-language support.
43-45: LGTM: New styled component added correctlyThe new
InfoWrapperstyled component is well-implemented. Using the theme for padding ensures consistency with the overall design system.
Line range hint
1-50: Overall: Well-implemented changes with good improvementsThe changes to the
ExpressionTabcomponent are well-implemented and provide good improvements in terms of flexibility and functionality. The addition of thedisabledstate and internationalization support enhances the component's versatility.A few minor suggestions were made for further improvement:
- Consider adding default values for optional props.
- Extract the disabled state message to a constant for better maintainability.
These changes align well with the PR objectives of enhancing the layer style editor and improving overall functionality.
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StyleNode/Field/index.tsx (3)
9-12: LGTM: Import changes are consistent with new features.The new imports for
AppearanceField,StyleSimpleValue,Typography,BooleanSelectorInput, andTypographyInputare correctly added and align with the new features implemented in this file.
14-19: LGTM: Type definition changes improve flexibility and clarity.The renaming of
PropstoFieldPropsand making thefieldproperty optional are good improvements. These changes enhance the component's flexibility and make the type more specific to its usage.
53-57: LGTM: Field component updates improve robustness.The changes to the
Fieldcomponent, including the use ofFieldPropsand the addition of a null check for thefieldprop, enhance the component's robustness and align well with the type changes.web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/appearanceNodes/marker.ts (4)
86-91: LGTM: Label visibility toggle implemented correctly.The "label" node is well-implemented as a boolean switch for toggling label visibility. Setting the default value to true is a good choice, ensuring labels are visible by default.
92-97: LGTM: Label text input field implemented correctly.The "labelText" node is well-implemented as a text field for specifying the label text. Using an empty string as the default value is appropriate, allowing users to add text as needed.
85-111: Overall, excellent implementation of label support for markers.The additions to the
markerNodesarray effectively implement support for label visibility, text, and typography as outlined in the PR objectives. The new nodes are well-structured and provide appropriate controls for users to customize marker labels.A minor clarification is needed regarding the use of
disableExpressionanddisableConditionsin the labelTypography node, but this doesn't detract from the overall quality of the implementation.Great job on enhancing the layer style editor with these new features!
98-111: LGTM: Label typography control implemented well, but clarification needed.The "labelTypography" node is well-implemented, providing comprehensive control over label appearance. The default values for typography properties are reasonable and cover essential aspects.
However, could you please clarify the reasoning behind setting
disableExpressionanddisableConditionsto true? This might limit flexibility in some scenarios. Are there specific reasons for disabling these features for typography?To understand if this is a pattern across other nodes, let's check for similar usage:
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StylePanel.tsx (2)
Line range hint
1-138: Verify the refactor of update logic mentioned in PR objectivesThe changes in this file enhance the
createNodefunction by adding new properties to style nodes. However, the PR objectives mention a refactor of the update logic when switching between tabs, which is not evident in this file.To ensure we haven't missed any important changes, please run the following script to search for recent modifications related to tab switching logic:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for recent changes related to tab switching logic # Search for files modified in the last week that might contain tab switching logic echo "Searching for recent changes related to tab switching:" git diff --name-only --since="1 week ago" | xargs rg --type typescript --type tsx -i '(tab|switch|update).*logic' -C 3This will help us locate any changes related to the tab switching logic mentioned in the PR objectives. If no relevant changes are found, we may need to clarify with the PR author about the status of this refactor.
36-38: LGTM! New properties added to style nodes.The addition of
disableExpressionanddisableConditionsproperties to the style nodes aligns with the PR objectives of enhancing support for marker properties. This change allows for more granular control over the style nodes.To ensure these new properties are used correctly throughout the application, please run the following script:
This will help us confirm that these properties are being utilized appropriately in other components that interact with style nodes.
✅ Verification successful
Verified: The properties
disableExpressionanddisableConditionsare consistently used across the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of new properties in other components # Search for usages of disableExpression and disableConditions echo "Searching for usages of disableExpression:" rg --type typescript --type tsx 'disableExpression' -C 3 echo "\nSearching for usages of disableConditions:" rg --type typescript --type tsx 'disableConditions' -C 3Length of output: 368
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of new properties in other components # Search for usages of disableExpression and disableConditions echo "Searching for usages of disableExpression:" rg --type ts --type tsx 'disableExpression' -C 3 echo "\nSearching for usages of disableConditions:" rg --type ts --type tsx 'disableConditions' -C 3Length of output: 347
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of new properties in other components # Search for usages of disableExpression and disableConditions echo "Searching for usages of disableExpression:" rg 'disableExpression' -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" -C 3 echo "\nSearching for usages of disableConditions:" rg 'disableConditions' -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" -C 3Length of output: 9746
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StyleNode/Field/TypographyInput.tsx (3)
1-12: LGTM: Imports are well-organized and appropriate.The imports cover all necessary dependencies for the component, including UI components, internationalization, theming, and custom components. The use of relative imports for local types and components is a good practice.
33-36: LGTM: Props type is well-defined.The Props type definition is clear and concise. It correctly defines the value prop as potentially undefined, which allows for optional values. The onChange prop is properly typed as a function that can handle both defined and undefined Typography values.
1-131: Summary: Well-implemented TypographyInput component with minor suggestions for improvement.This new TypographyInput component successfully addresses the PR objective of adding support for typography properties in the layer style editor. The implementation is clean, well-structured, and makes good use of existing UI components and theming.
Key points:
- The component handles all necessary typography properties: font family, size, weight, color, italic, and underline.
- Proper use of internationalization for labels.
- Well-organized styled components for consistent layout and styling.
Suggestions for improvement:
- Fix the typo in
fonwWeightOptionsand consider expanding font weight options.- Enhance type safety when spreading the potentially undefined
valueobject.- Consider extracting common styles in styled components to reduce repetition.
These changes will further improve the code quality and maintainability of the component.
Regarding the PR objectives:
- The implementation of unit tests is still pending, as mentioned in the PR description.
- A comprehensive review of the full property list should be conducted to ensure all necessary typography properties are covered.
To ensure that this component is properly integrated and used within the layer style editor, please run the following verification script:
This script will help identify where and how the TypographyInput component is being used in the layer style editor, ensuring proper integration.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: TypographyInput Integration Confirmed.
The shell scripts executed successfully identified multiple instances where
TypographyInputand theTypographytype are correctly imported and utilized within theLayerStylePanelcomponents. This confirms that theTypographyInputcomponent is properly integrated into the layer style editor as intended.No further issues were detected regarding the integration of this component.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of TypographyInput in the layer style editor # Test: Check if TypographyInput is imported and used in the layer style editor components rg --type typescript -e "import.*TypographyInput" -e "TypographyInput" ./web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel # Test: Verify that the Typography type is consistently used across the codebase rg --type typescript -e "import.*Typography" -e "Typography" ./web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanelLength of output: 303
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of TypographyInput in the layer style editor # Test: Check if TypographyInput is imported and used in the layer style editor components rg -g "*.ts*" -e "import.*TypographyInput" -e "TypographyInput" ./web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel # Test: Verify that the Typography type is consistently used across the codebase rg -g "*.ts*" -e "import.*Typography" -e "Typography" ./web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanelLength of output: 3971
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StyleNode/index.tsx (3)
23-34: LGTM: Improved flexibility withmatchpropertyThe addition of the
matchproperty to theactionsarray is a good improvement. It allows for more flexible matching of style value types, which aligns well with the PR objectives of supporting new marker properties. The code is clean and well-structured.
144-147: LGTM: Consistent improvements to ConditionsTabThe changes to the ConditionsTab mirror those made to the ExpressionTab, adding a
disabledprop and a new condition for rendering a disabled tab whenactiveTab === "deepConditions". This consistency is good for maintainability and aligns with the overall improvements in flexibility.
Line range hint
1-147: Overall: Good improvements, with some points for considerationThe changes in this file significantly improve the flexibility of the
StyleNodeCompcomponent and align well with the PR objectives of supporting new marker properties. The code quality is good, with clear and consistent patterns throughout.Key improvements:
- Enhanced
actionsarray with thematchproperty.- Updated logic for determining active tabs and icon colors.
- Added support for "deep" variants of expression and conditions tabs.
Points for consideration:
- Clarify the purpose and use cases for the "deep" variants (deepExpression, deepConditions).
- Consider refining the
setActiveTablogic in theonClickhandler to ensure it always sets to a valid matched value.These changes provide a solid foundation for the new features. Once the points above are addressed, this implementation should effectively support the new marker properties as intended.
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StyleNode/ConditionsTab.tsx (2)
58-58: LGTM! Prop destructuring updated correctly.The addition of the
disabledprop in the component's destructured props correctly reflects the changes made to thePropstype. This ensures that the component can utilize the newdisabledstate.
244-253: LGTM! Styled components updated to support new functionality.The changes to the styled components effectively support the new conditional rendering logic:
- Renaming
WrappertoConditionsWrapperimproves code clarity by being more descriptive.- The new
InfoWrapperstyled component provides appropriate styling for the disabled state message.These updates align well with the component's enhanced functionality.
web/src/services/i18n/translations/ja.yml (3)
Line range hint
284-285: Approved: Improved translations for project deletionThe updated translations for project deletion accurately convey the action of moving the project to the recycle bin. They provide clear information to the user and use appropriate Japanese terminology.
Line range hint
422-423: Approved: Enhanced translations for layer updatesThe updated translations for layer update messages now include exclamation marks, making them more enthusiastic and consistent with the English versions. The translations accurately convey the intended meanings.
Line range hint
452-479: Approved: Improved consistency and clarity in action messagesThe updates to project, story, and workspace action messages significantly improve the translation file:
- Success messages now consistently end with exclamation marks, conveying enthusiasm.
- Failure messages now consistently end with periods, maintaining a more neutral tone.
- Several messages have been reworded for improved clarity and consistency.
These changes enhance the overall user experience by providing clear and consistent feedback across different actions. The translations accurately reflect their English counterparts while maintaining natural Japanese language usage.
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/types.ts (5)
8-14: Addition of "typography" to AppearanceFieldThe
"typography"field has been correctly added to theAppearanceFieldtype.
24-25: Added optional properties to AppearanceNodeThe optional properties
disableExpressionanddisableConditionshave been appropriately added toAppearanceNode.
40-41: Added optional properties to StyleNodeThe optional properties
disableExpressionanddisableConditionshave been appropriately added toStyleNode.
51-57: Inclusion of Typography in StyleSimpleValueThe
Typographytype has been correctly included inStyleSimpleValue.
67-69: Definition of Expression typeThe
Expressiontype has been correctly defined and appropriately added.web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/convert.ts (2)
11-14: Imports of new types are appropriateThe addition of
StyleValue,ExpressionCondition,Expression, andStyleValueTypeto the imports enhances type definitions and clarity in the code.
48-96: Refactored type checking improves code modularityExtracting the type-checking logic into the
checkExpressionAndConditionsfunction enhances code readability and reusability. This separation of concerns makes theparseStyleValuefunction cleaner and more maintainable.
...eatures/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StyleNode/Field/TypographyInput.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StyleNode/index.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/types.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/types.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/types.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/convert.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StyleNode/Field/TypographyInput.tsx (2)
41-54: LGTM: Font family and font size inputs are well-implemented.The implementation of font family and font size inputs is correct and uses appropriate components. The use of PropertyItem components ensures consistent styling and layout.
Consider adding a unit (e.g., "px" or "em") to the font size input label for clarity:
<PropertyItem title={t("font size (px)")}> {/* ... */} </PropertyItem>This would help users understand the expected unit for font size values.
110-131: LGTM: Styled components are well-defined and use theme values appropriately.The styled components for PropertyItemWrapper, Title, and Content are well-implemented, using theme values for consistent styling. The layout and styling are appropriate for the component's purpose.
Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the fixed widths for Title and Content:
const Title = styled("div")(({ theme }) => ({ // ... other styles width: "50%", // Ensures consistent alignment across all property items flexGrow: 0 })); const Content = styled("div")(() => ({ width: "50%", // Matches Title width for balanced layout flexGrow: 0 }));This would help other developers understand the reasoning behind these specific style choices.
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/convert.ts (2)
38-40: LGTM: Enhanced style node properties improve flexibility.The addition of
notSupported,disableExpression, anddisableConditionsproperties enhances the flexibility of style nodes. This allows for better control over node behavior and UI rendering.Consider adding comments to explain the purpose of these new properties, especially
notSupported, to improve code readability.
48-101: LGTM: Well-implemented type checking function.The
checkExpressionAndConditionsfunction is a well-structured addition that centralizes the logic for determining value types. It covers various cases and includes null checks to prevent potential runtime errors.Consider adding JSDoc comments to describe the function's purpose and return values, which would enhance code documentation.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StyleNode/Field/TypographyInput.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/convert.ts (2 hunks)
- web/src/beta/lib/reearth-ui/components/Typography/index.tsx (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- web/src/beta/lib/reearth-ui/components/Typography/index.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (7)
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StyleNode/Field/TypographyInput.tsx (4)
33-40: LGTM: Props and component declaration are well-structured.The Props type definition and component declaration are clear and concise. The use of the useT hook for internationalization is a good practice, ensuring that the component can be easily localized.
55-84: LGTM: Font weight, color, italic, and underline inputs are well-implemented.The implementation of font weight, color, italic, and underline inputs is correct and uses appropriate components. The onChange handlers correctly update the typography value.
Note: As mentioned in the earlier comment, consider expanding the font weight options for more precise control. This would require updating the onChange handler for the font weight Selector to handle string values instead of the current union type.
89-96: LGTM: Component export and Wrapper styled component are well-defined.The TypographyInput component is correctly exported as default. The Wrapper styled component is well-defined, using theme values for consistent styling and layout.
98-108: LGTM: PropertyItem component is well-structured and reusable.The PropertyItem component is well-defined, providing a consistent layout for all input fields in the TypographyInput component. Its reusability contributes to maintaining a consistent UI throughout the component.
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/convert.ts (3)
11-14: LGTM: New type imports align with PR objectives.The addition of new type imports (
StyleValue,ExpressionCondition,Expression, andStyleValueType) aligns well with the PR's objective of enhancing the layer style editor. These types will likely be used in the new and modified functions, improving type safety and code clarity.
103-113: LGTM: Improved parseStyleValue function.The refactored
parseStyleValuefunction now leverages the newcheckExpressionAndConditionsfunction, resulting in cleaner and more maintainable code. The new structure provides a clear separation of concerns and improves overall readability.
Line range hint
1-193: Overall assessment: Well-implemented enhancements to layer style editing.The changes in this file successfully implement the PR objectives by enhancing the layer style editor's functionality. The new
checkExpressionAndConditionsfunction and the refactoredparseStyleValuefunction improve code organization and maintainability. The additional properties inconvertToStyleNodesprovide more flexibility in handling style nodes.A few minor suggestions for improvement:
- Add comments to explain the new properties in
convertToStyleNodes.- Consider adding JSDoc comments to the
checkExpressionAndConditionsfunction.These changes lay a solid foundation for supporting marker properties like
label,labelText, andlabelTypographyas mentioned in the PR objectives.
...eatures/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StyleNode/Field/TypographyInput.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Overview
labellabelTextlabelTypographyWhat I've done
What I haven't done
How I tested
Which point I want you to review particularly
Memo
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
TypographyInputcomponent for managing typography-related properties.ConditionsTabandExpressionTabcomponents, enhancing their flexibility.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Refactor