-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged F extension instructions. Some fields are not populated #114
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Afonso Oliveira <Afonso.Oliveira@synopsys.com>
582ba5a
to
1bae44e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Cool. The errors you are getting with the operation() are probably just because some things have moved around since that dhower/f branch was created. It's likely a quick fix.
Would you be able to add them back in on this branch? I can then run it locally and fix it up.
Sure, give me just a couple minutes and I'll commit them here. |
Signed-off-by: Afonso Oliveira <Afonso.Oliveira@synopsys.com>
@dhower-qc Done! |
I added some missing files (fp.idl) and fixed up the IDL code where, e.g., function signatures have changed. Should pass now. |
Signed-off-by: Afonso Oliveira <Afonso.Oliveira@synopsys.com>
Signed-off-by: Afonso Oliveira <Afonso.Oliveira@synopsys.com>
@dhower-qc Unless I missed or wrongfully assigned any register, this PR is now ready. |
This PR is only about the F extension. I merged in the info from dhower/F with the exception of operations because they were creating some errors. I haven't taken a close look to ALL fields and therefore some of them have different syntax for source registers. The html builds sucessfully with this and the regress test passes.