Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

icub3: fix ft frame exportation #176

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 24, 2020
Merged

icub3: fix ft frame exportation #176

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 24, 2020

Conversation

Nicogene
Copy link
Member

@Nicogene Nicogene commented Nov 20, 2020

Since in icub3 the ft frames are associated to the parent link we needed to add a functionality in simmechanics_to_urdf. (It is harcoded that they are referenced to the child link)

Then DO NOT MERGE before robotology/simmechanics-to-urdf#45

cc @pattacini @S-Dafarra

@Nicogene Nicogene requested a review from traversaro November 20, 2020 16:44
@Nicogene Nicogene self-assigned this Nov 20, 2020
@Nicogene Nicogene marked this pull request as ready for review November 23, 2020 14:49
@traversaro
Copy link
Member

FYI @GiulioRomualdi @prashanthr05 the FT sensor frame used by iDynTree will probably be wrong until this PR is merged.

@traversaro
Copy link
Member

After robotology/simmechanics-to-urdf#45 we probably need to bump the simmechanics-to-urdf version used in CI, right?

@Nicogene
Copy link
Member Author

After robotology/simmechanics-to-urdf#45 we probably need to bump the simmechanics-to-urdf version used in CI, right?

Maybe it is not mandatory since it takes the latest master 🤔

@traversaro
Copy link
Member

After robotology/simmechanics-to-urdf#45 we probably need to bump the simmechanics-to-urdf version used in CI, right?

Maybe it is not mandatory since it takes the latest master 🤔

Ah, I had no idea. Probably it is better to use a fixed version for reproducibility, but we can do it in another PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants