Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NS Update #13

Merged
merged 61 commits into from
Oct 4, 2022
Merged

NS Update #13

merged 61 commits into from
Oct 4, 2022

Conversation

ronnieg123
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

samihusseingit and others added 30 commits November 3, 2019 19:11
This helps create an area for developing towards the next version.
Allow users to choose whether or not to reveal the provenance of the data to
consumers.  This is intended to help protect data rights to portability and
access.  If consumers start abusing or discriminating against Nightscout users
due to the source of the data, this allows users to conceal this information.
Disregard brand of device when considering glucose values.  By de facto usage,
the meaning of LOW and HIGH within Nightscout means that glucose is beyond limits.
LOW means 40 or lower.  HIGH means 400 or higher.  Both tend to invite
questioning therapy options, including inspecting if the device is working
correctly, as well as potential treatment options.
The results to render may come from an in-memory cache, or from the database.
If they came from the in-memory cache, it's possible that obscurring the device
field could actually change the values in memory.  When obscurring, the device
field, this patch copies all of the values in order to ensure that the
in-memory copies are unaffected.  With this patch, cached objects should not be
affected.
With this change, any code referencing the sandbox or /api/v2/properties for
plugin will also benefit from having the device information obscured.
…/cgm-remote-monitor into wip/bewest/obscure-provenance
Temporarily use git references to share2nightscout-bridge and
minimed-connect-to-nightscout in order to help test similar changes in those
packages.
The tests pass cleanly.
Run tests also against nodejs 16.x
bewest and others added 28 commits April 30, 2022 09:00
Results could be null and can crash the website
This reverts commit ead83e0.
Minor differences are causing the tests to fail consistently.
npm ls fsevent didn't list any output.  I'm running on linux,
and regenerating this file after removing it seems to remove
the fsevent package from the file.
It's likely that fsevent may be used in development mode as part
of one of the build utilities, but it shouldn't block anyone from
deploying.

#7475
The build still fails for node 12.x.
Skip optional dependencies.

https://stackoverflow.com/a/48953213
Fix incorrect appending for loop enacted status. LGTM.
Remove npm list from engine as it is intended to be advisory.
This makes the testing framework and the advertised node versions match, one
for one.
Allow Remote Carb Entries in Past or Future
* Build docker image for arm64 architecture

* Add `platforms` input

* Merge `master` and `dev` jobs together into one

* Run job on master or dev branch
@ronnieg123 ronnieg123 merged commit 9536f9e into ronnieg123:master Oct 4, 2022
@ronnieg123
Copy link
Owner Author

Merged

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants