Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use idl files (if any) #82

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 5, 2019
Merged

use idl files (if any) #82

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 5, 2019

Conversation

dirk-thomas
Copy link
Member

Signed-off-by: Dirk Thomas <dirk-thomas@users.noreply.github.com>
@dirk-thomas dirk-thomas added the in review Waiting for review (Kanban column) label Jun 5, 2019
@dirk-thomas dirk-thomas self-assigned this Jun 5, 2019
Copy link
Member

@jacobperron jacobperron left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

With the current state of ros2/test_interface_files#6, this will not build the IDL messages. To help prevent regressions, is it possible to only generate the new message for fastrtps?

@dirk-thomas
Copy link
Member Author

is it possible to only generate the new message for fastrtps?

Where and how should that condition be added?

@jacobperron
Copy link
Member

Where and how should that condition be added?

It would be nice if we could do it in the CMakeLists.txt, but I'm not sure how. If there's not a known easy way to do this then we can leave it as-is.

@dirk-thomas dirk-thomas merged commit 75e94e1 into master Jun 5, 2019
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the dirk-thomas/idl-only-types branch June 5, 2019 21:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
in review Waiting for review (Kanban column)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants