Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update to rust 2015-03-26 #1458

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 26, 2015
Merged

Update to rust 2015-03-26 #1458

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 26, 2015

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Down with as_slice!

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r+ 64d76b5

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 26, 2015

⌛ Testing commit 64d76b5 with merge 5e44b98...

@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @huonw

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@alexcrichton alexcrichton assigned alexcrichton and unassigned huonw Mar 26, 2015
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 26, 2015

💔 Test failed - cargo-linux-32

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r+

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:27 AM, bors notifications@github.com wrote:

[image: 💔] Test failed - cargo-linux-32
http://buildbot.rust-lang.org/builders/cargo-linux-32/builds/1042


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1458 (comment).

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 26, 2015

📌 Commit 0ce0638 has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 26, 2015

⌛ Testing commit 0ce0638 with merge e54cc82...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 26, 2015

💔 Test failed - cargo-win-32

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r+

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:44 AM, bors notifications@github.com wrote:

[image: 💔] Test failed - cargo-win-32
http://buildbot.rust-lang.org/builders/cargo-win-32/builds/925


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1458 (comment).

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 26, 2015

📌 Commit 80ae82a has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 26, 2015

⌛ Testing commit 80ae82a with merge 10004ee...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 26, 2015

💔 Test failed - cargo-mac-32

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r+

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:56 AM, bors notifications@github.com wrote:

[image: 💔] Test failed - cargo-mac-32
http://buildbot.rust-lang.org/builders/cargo-mac-32/builds/1043


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1458 (comment).

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 26, 2015

📌 Commit 964e72f has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 26, 2015

⌛ Testing commit 964e72f with merge 37b4113...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 26, 2015

💔 Test failed - cargo-win-64

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: retry

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:17 PM, bors notifications@github.com wrote:

[image: 💔] Test failed - cargo-win-64
http://buildbot.rust-lang.org/builders/cargo-win-64/builds/572


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1458 (comment).

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 26, 2015

⌛ Testing commit 964e72f with merge cb21229...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2015
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 26, 2015

💔 Test failed - cargo-win-64

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: retry

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 26, 2015

⚡ Previous build results for cargo-linux-32, cargo-linux-64, cargo-mac-32, cargo-mac-64, cargo-win-32 are reusable. Rebuilding only cargo-win-64...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 26, 2015

☀️ Test successful - cargo-linux-32, cargo-linux-64, cargo-mac-32, cargo-mac-64, cargo-win-32, cargo-win-64

@bors bors merged commit 964e72f into rust-lang:master Mar 26, 2015
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the update branch March 27, 2015 00:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants