Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove rustfmt from Travis #5278

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 2, 2018
Merged

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

As discussed at the recent work week this is probably a bit too zealous at this
time, so let's hold off on it until it's either more stable or we figure out a
better way to deal with changes in rustfmt.

For now though it'll hopefully be easy to continue running rustfmt every so
often!

As discussed at the recent work week this is probably a bit too zealous at this
time, so let's hold off on it until it's either more stable or we figure out a
better way to deal with changes in rustfmt.

For now though it'll hopefully be easy to continue running rustfmt every so
often!
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 2, 2018

📌 Commit 194a161 has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 2, 2018

⌛ Testing commit 194a161 with merge 48a9e62...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2018
Remove rustfmt from Travis

As discussed at the recent work week this is probably a bit too zealous at this
time, so let's hold off on it until it's either more stable or we figure out a
better way to deal with changes in rustfmt.

For now though it'll hopefully be easy to continue running rustfmt every so
often!
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 2, 2018

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: alexcrichton
Pushing 48a9e62 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 194a161 into rust-lang:master Apr 2, 2018
@ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

ehuss commented Apr 2, 2018

This also makes the changes from #5206 a little incorrect.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants