Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Outdated ticky box lists #212

Closed
aturon opened this issue May 25, 2018 · 6 comments
Closed

Outdated ticky box lists #212

aturon opened this issue May 25, 2018 · 6 comments

Comments

@aturon
Copy link
Member

aturon commented May 25, 2018

My personal checklist is pretty outdated. For example:

and so on

@Centril
Copy link
Contributor

Centril commented Jun 20, 2018

Hmm... Could you provide a bit more detail about what's wrong?
Not sure what needs to be fixed at the moment.

@anp
Copy link
Member

anp commented Jun 21, 2018

@Centril IIRC @aturon was talking about the list at https://rfcbot.rs/fcp/aturon. It is indeed quite long, I believe longer than the number of current FCPs even.

@Centril
Copy link
Contributor

Centril commented Jun 21, 2018

Oh weird; they don't show up on https://rfcbot.rs/ tho. I'll investigate soon-ish :)

@anp
Copy link
Member

anp commented Jun 21, 2018

This issue is here I think: https://github.com/anp/rfcbot-rs/blob/master/src/nag.rs#L77-L80. When the consensus metric changed from "all team members have reviewed" to "most team members have reviewed" that query would no longer function. Once an FCP finishes, you'd still be a reviewer who had not read it, but I don't think checking the boxes would ever update the database (who needs to update the state of things that are fully finished?).

@anp
Copy link
Member

anp commented Jun 21, 2018

So I think the solution would be to modify that query to only include FCPs that are pending or active.

@Centril
Copy link
Contributor

Centril commented Jun 21, 2018

@anp yeah; that sounds accurate.

Centril added a commit to Centril/rfcbot-rs that referenced this issue Jun 21, 2018
anoadragon453 pushed a commit to matrix-org/mscbot that referenced this issue Jul 6, 2018
Centril added a commit to Centril/rfcbot-rs that referenced this issue Aug 11, 2018
Centril added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 16, 2018
* add itertools as dependency.

* add database model for Poll stuff.

* really add itertools as dependency in main.rs.

* teams: expose test data, change team names a bit, expose ping and name of teams.

* refactor a bunch of logic and implement polling (hopefully...).

* update command grammar in README.md.

* fix syntax error in up.sql migration.

* fix copy error in up.sql migration.

* fix typo in up.sql migration.

* close poll when everyone has answered it.

* fix #212 by filtering in unstarted fcps. (#223)

* Update toolchain and lockfile (#232)

* update toolchain and lockfile.

* add never_type gate.

* Add Centril to the lang team (#230)

* fix typos (quized -> quizzed).

* fix 225, and deal with leading whitespace.

* colocate from_invocation_line and from_str_all.

* get rid of global state from command parser.

* review -> response for polls.

* fix comments.

* make progress on all 3 in evaluate_nags.

* RfcBotCommand::{AskQuestion -> StartPoll}.

* gracefully handle poll comment typos.

* fix bug.
tmandry added a commit to tmandry/rfcbot-rs that referenced this issue Jan 11, 2024
I'd really like to see RFCs in active final comment period that I haven't reviewed yet. Especially since now is my last chance to review them!

The current filter was originally added to address rust-lang#212; I think this filter would have addressed that concern as well.
Mark-Simulacrum pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 11, 2024
I'd really like to see RFCs in active final comment period that I haven't reviewed yet. Especially since now is my last chance to review them!

The current filter was originally added to address #212; I think this filter would have addressed that concern as well.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants