Skip to content

Conversation

@iredelmeier
Copy link
Contributor

This fixes a regression introduced by #13290, in which failing to set checkOnSave/target (or checkOnSave/targets) would lead to an invalid config.

[Fixes #13660]

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 21, 2022
This fixes a regression introduced by rust-lang#13290, in which failing to set
`checkOnSave/target` (or `checkOnSave/targets`) would lead to an invalid
config.
@iredelmeier iredelmeier force-pushed the fix-null-checkonsave-target branch from 00ece98 to b116fe9 Compare November 21, 2022 21:40
@jonas-schievink
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks! @bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 24, 2022

📌 Commit b116fe9 has been approved by jonas-schievink

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 24, 2022

⌛ Testing commit b116fe9 with merge e9f6087...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 24, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: jonas-schievink
Pushing e9f6087 to master...

@bors bors merged commit e9f6087 into rust-lang:master Nov 24, 2022
@poliorcetics
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry 😞 thanks for catching it though !

arcnmx added a commit to arcnmx/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2022
The prior update included checkOnSave multiple targets:
rust-lang/rust-analyzer#13290
but missed the fix for the regression it caused:
rust-lang/rust-analyzer#13661

Merge commit '6d61be8e65ac0fd45eaf178e1f7a1ec6b582de1f'
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Minor regression with null checkOnSave/target value

5 participants