Tracking issue for RFC 3695: Allow boolean literals as cfg predicates #131204
Labels
B-RFC-approved
Blocker: Approved by a merged RFC but not yet implemented.
C-tracking-issue
Category: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFC
T-lang
Relevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
This is a tracking issue for the RFC "Allow boolean literals as cfg predicates" (rust-lang/rfcs/#3695).
The feature gate for the issue is
#![feature(cfg_boolean_literals)]
.About tracking issues
Tracking issues are used to record the overall progress of implementation.
They are also used as hubs connecting to other relevant issues, e.g., bugs or open design questions.
A tracking issue is however not meant for large scale discussion, questions, or bug reports about a feature.
Instead, open a dedicated issue for the specific matter and add the relevant feature gate label.
Discussion comments will get marked as off-topic or deleted.
Repeated discussions on the tracking issue may lead to the tracking issue getting locked.
Steps
cfg
predicates rfcs#3695Unresolved Questions
None.
Related
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: