-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement RFC3695 Allow boolean literals as cfg predicates #131034
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Sep 29, 2024
Urgau
commented
Sep 29, 2024
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Some changes occurred in src/librustdoc/clean/types.rs cc @camelid |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Urgau
force-pushed
the
cfg-true-false
branch
from
September 30, 2024 07:29
bcc6f65
to
85e872a
Compare
jieyouxu
reviewed
Sep 30, 2024
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Urgau
force-pushed
the
cfg-true-false
branch
2 times, most recently
from
September 30, 2024 18:34
c17dd7b
to
10dbf46
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Urgau
force-pushed
the
cfg-true-false
branch
from
September 30, 2024 20:00
10dbf46
to
3db7704
Compare
nnethercote
reviewed
Oct 1, 2024
nnethercote
reviewed
Oct 1, 2024
compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/error_reporting/traits/on_unimplemented.rs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
nnethercote
reviewed
Oct 1, 2024
nnethercote
reviewed
Oct 1, 2024
nnethercote
reviewed
Oct 1, 2024
src/doc/unstable-book/src/language-features/cfg-boolean-literals.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
nnethercote
reviewed
Oct 1, 2024
Basically looks good, a few comments above. |
Thanks! @bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Oct 1, 2024
Let's wait until the RFC is actually merged, so that I can put the right tracking issue number. I will r=you when it's done. @bors r- |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Oct 1, 2024
This was referenced Oct 3, 2024
Added the tracking issue. CI passes. Let's go. |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
labels
Oct 4, 2024
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 4, 2024
Implement RFC3695 Allow boolean literals as cfg predicates This PR implements rust-lang/rfcs#3695: allow boolean literals as cfg predicates, i.e. `cfg(true)` and `cfg(false)`. r? `@nnethercote` *(or anyone with parser knowledge)* cc `@clubby789`
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Oct 4, 2024
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Oct 4, 2024
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 4, 2024
…llaumeGomez Rollup of 4 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#131034 (Implement RFC3695 Allow boolean literals as cfg predicates) - rust-lang#131202 (Use wide pointers consistenly across the compiler) - rust-lang#131230 (Enable `--no-sandbox` option by default for rustdoc GUI tests) - rust-lang#131232 (Week off of reviews to focus on docs) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 4, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#131034 - Urgau:cfg-true-false, r=nnethercote Implement RFC3695 Allow boolean literals as cfg predicates This PR implements rust-lang/rfcs#3695: allow boolean literals as cfg predicates, i.e. `cfg(true)` and `cfg(false)`. r? `@nnethercote` *(or anyone with parser knowledge)* cc `@clubby789`
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
CI-spurious-fail-msvc
CI spurious failure: target env msvc
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR implements rust-lang/rfcs#3695: allow boolean literals as cfg predicates, i.e.
cfg(true)
andcfg(false)
.r? @nnethercote (or anyone with parser knowledge)
cc @clubby789