Rollup of 4 pull requests #131237
Merged
Rollup of 4 pull requests #131237
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Dedicating a week to work on rustc-dev-guide.
Implement RFC3695 Allow boolean literals as cfg predicates This PR implements rust-lang/rfcs#3695: allow boolean literals as cfg predicates, i.e. `cfg(true)` and `cfg(false)`. r? `@nnethercote` *(or anyone with parser knowledge)* cc `@clubby789`
Use wide pointers consistenly across the compiler This PR replace every use of "fat pointer" for the more recent "wide pointer" terminology. Since some time T-lang as preferred the "wide pointer" terminology, as can be seen on [the last RFCs](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Arust-lang%2Frfcs+%22wide+pointer%22&type=code), on some [lints](https://doc.rust-lang.org/rustc/lints/listing/warn-by-default.html#ambiguous-wide-pointer-comparisons), but also in [the reference](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/reference/expressions/operator-expr.html?highlight=wide%20pointer#pointer-to-pointer-cast). Currently we have a [mix of both](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Arust-lang%2Frust+%22wide+pointer%22&type=code) (including in error messages), which isn't great, but with this PR no more. r? `@jieyouxu` (feel free to re-roll)
…ddle Enable `--no-sandbox` option by default for rustdoc GUI tests It's apparently common enough for people to have issues with the `sandbox` mode in chromium, so better disable it by default. r? `@notriddle`
Week off of reviews to focus on docs Dedicating a week to work on rustc-dev-guide. Should be back on Oct. 11/12.
rustbot
added
A-meta
|
@bors r+ p=4 rollup=never |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:
previous master: 267cf8d3b2 In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
This was referenced Oct 4, 2024
|
Finished benchmarking commit (c39f318): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary -2.5%, secondary 0.6%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 771.923s -> 771.465s (-0.06%) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
--no-sandboxoption by default for rustdoc GUI tests #131230 (Enable--no-sandboxoption by default for rustdoc GUI tests)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup